Has the Gov't. Truly Banned Avastin because it is too Expensive?
Comments
-
they better not
I also heard this but only for breast ca. and this is horrible news for any ca pt..we have to stick together and write our insurance carriers and government..they are calling these death panels and it is preey scary.....val0 -
Not sure
It is very expensive and I think I read that there will never be a generic version, but don't remember the reason. I have not heard that the govt was banning it, but the FDA is no longer rec. it for breast cancer. It supposedly slowed disease progression IN Breast cancer patients but ultimately didn't extend life by any appreciable amount. I think it's still approved for other cancers...0 -
I don't want to start aCindy Bear said:Not sure
It is very expensive and I think I read that there will never be a generic version, but don't remember the reason. I have not heard that the govt was banning it, but the FDA is no longer rec. it for breast cancer. It supposedly slowed disease progression IN Breast cancer patients but ultimately didn't extend life by any appreciable amount. I think it's still approved for other cancers...
I don't want to start a political brush fire, but at least one anti-Obama website falsely claimed: "The FDA is considering 'de-listing' the drug Avastin for use with breast cancer patients -- not because it doesn't work, but because of its cost."
It went on to state:
"With a new government health care regime paradigm being established, cost to insurance companies and government health care services will play a critical role in whether patients will have the option of life extending drugs."
There is absolutely no truth to these statements. They are nothing more than fear-mongering.
What is true is that the FDA is recommending removing the breast cancer indication from the label for Avastin because the drug has not been shown to be safe and effective for that use.
The agency is making this recommendation after reviewing the results of four clinical studies of Avastin in women with breast cancer and determining that the data indicate that the drug does not prolong overall survival in breast cancer patients or provide a sufficient benefit in slowing disease progression to outweigh the significant risk to patients. These risks include severe high blood pressure; bleeding and hemorrhage; the development of perforations (or “holes”) in the body, including in the nose, stomach, and intestines; and heart attack or heart failure.
Avastin has never been FDA approved for Ovarian Cancer.
Carlene0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards