Let me introduce myself

I actually think I posted to one of the subjects before but I never really introduced myself. I am new to breast cancer but not new to cancer. I had endo cancer Stage 2B, grade 3 in 2000. I had a hysterectomy and radiation treatments (external and internal) and have been NED for 9 years. In 2002 I had bladder cancer. It was very small and it was removed during the cystocopy and I have been NED for 6 1/2 years. In 2003, I had a couple of squamous skin cancers removed. And that has been fine also. I do all my follow ups (yearly now) and always have my mammograms done at the same time I go for my endo re-check. In 2005, I had to go back for additional films and then had a biopsy on my right breast. There were microcalcifications that were suspicious. Happily they were just that, no cancer and they put in a clip and I continued with my regular check ups. In early October of 2008, I again did my regular mammos and they called to do additional films on both breasts. I figured more calcifications. After these were done, I got a call from my doctor that they wanted to do biopsies on both breasts and I still thought calcification because what are the odds that I would get cancer in both breasts at the same time and in the same location. He sent me the report from the radiologist and being a research freak when it comes to anything medical, I went online and punched in the information. I saw that the description wasn't calcifications but solid masses, both very small but not cysts. My report said that they recommended ultrasound guided biopsies for both. When I went for the biopsies, they were able to do the right breast but they felt that the left would be better done stereotactically so we scheduled that for the following week. Two days later my doctor called and said that it was a cancer in the right breast, small but IDC. He and I discussed the possibility that the left would be cancer also. But he also said it could be atypical hyperplasia and it was. I then saw a breast coordinator and then my surgeon. I had my surgery (bi-lateral wire guided lumpectomies)the Tuesday before Thanksgiving. They did both breasts because sometimes there is DCIS along with atypical hyperplasia and she wanted to remove the area in question and have further pathology on it. I had a sentinel node biopsy done on the right side as well. They got clean margins on the left breast. On the right breast, she had pathology check the margins while I was under and she had to take more tissue so that avoided the closing up and then having to go back for more surgery. Good for her and better for me. The final diagnosis was left breast .5 cm area of atypical hyperplasia but not cancer, right breast 1 cm IDC, no node involvement, ER+< PR+, HER neu. So our plan was to do radiation (30 + 5 boosts), start armidex for 5 years. When I went to meet with the oncologist, she mentioned the TailorX clinical study and said I was a good candidate. So they sent the sample to them for the oncotype DX and then based on the number I would be put into one of three groups. I am sure most of you know about this but for those that don't the oncotype DX score can help determine if chemo would be benefical in preventing recurrence. The lower the score the better. They know that women with scores of 0-10 would receive very little benefit from adding chemo. And scores over 25 would benefit from chemo. The reason for the study is that they don't really know if chemo is beneficial to those with scores between 11 and 25. Right now woman in that range, really pretty much have to decide with their oncologist whether to do the chemo. As you all know chemo is hard on the body, mind, soul and other health of someone with cancer. So they want to refine the numbers. So the group that has scores between 11 and 25 are being randomized (luck of the draw) into 2 groups. One group will do hormone, radiation only and the other will do chemo, hormone and radiation. They will study them for 10 years and this will help determine recurrences in one group vs the other and that will enable them to better decide scores vs treatment. They will continue to follow the groups for 20 years. I had a score of 21 and was put in the hormone, radiation only group. I would have had a hard time deciding chemo or not if I was not in this study and I probably would have gone with chemo but I feel this study is so important and if I should have a recurrence then I can do chemo and whatever else I need to then. This is so long and I apologize but I wanted to truly let you know what I have experienced for far. Now that you know about my cancer let me tell you about me. I am 60, happily married to a great guy, have 1 beautiful daughter, 1 great son in law, and two wonderful grandchildren (4 year old boy and 6 month old girl). I have a good life and cherish every day. I also feel so blessed to have found this site. I have been reading your posts for several months and you are witty, brave, honest, caring people. I have heard such inspirational thoughts, heard the support that you give each other, heard from caring supportive husbands etc. I will be popping up now that I have made myself known and no I won't ramble like this in the future. Thank you for being here.
Stef