has anyone heard of this?
staceyp
Member Posts: 26
Hi all,
A friend of my husband's gave us an article about IPT therapy. It stands for Insulin Potentiation Therapy. The article says it has cured people at all stages. Patients are give a dose of insulin and then a tiny dose of chemo. The insulin makes the chemo more effective so you don't need as much. Best of all, you don't get all of those icky side effects. The website is www.secondopinionnewsletter.com.
It makes sense. I know that cancer cells feed on glucose. The article says that the cells think they are being fed because of the insulin, but get hit with the chemo instead.
Please let me know if anyone has heard of this. It sounds just too good to be true.
Thanks guys,
Stacey
A friend of my husband's gave us an article about IPT therapy. It stands for Insulin Potentiation Therapy. The article says it has cured people at all stages. Patients are give a dose of insulin and then a tiny dose of chemo. The insulin makes the chemo more effective so you don't need as much. Best of all, you don't get all of those icky side effects. The website is www.secondopinionnewsletter.com.
It makes sense. I know that cancer cells feed on glucose. The article says that the cells think they are being fed because of the insulin, but get hit with the chemo instead.
Please let me know if anyone has heard of this. It sounds just too good to be true.
Thanks guys,
Stacey
0
Comments
-
Sorry, I didn't look it up on the site because our friend gave us the actual article. But I just visited the site and you can type insulin potentiation therapy in the search on the site and it should bring it up. Let me know what you think. It really is amazing. I'm going to ask my husband's doctor if he would consider trying it on him. You never know.nanuk said:do you have a reference to the article? I went to the site, but couldn't find anything on IPT....
Bud0 -
hi, y'all--
I have not previously heard of this. The Sloan-Kettering website on alternative treatment says that this combination is "questionable" and "unproven." However, that may just be their analysis. It sounds interesting and something that may be worthwhile to check out further.0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 538 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards