From the US National Library of Medicine
I found this as part of a study done between 1989 and 2008. For those of us who had very small tumors (less than 3 cm), this is extremely hopeful news. Hope this is interesting. Here is a link to the page if you want to read the more in depth article, but below is the quick abstract:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2735023/
RISK OF METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA ACCORDING TO TUMOR SIZE
Abstract
Purpose
Recent evidence suggests significantly discordant findings regarding tumor size and the risk of metastases in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Herein, we present our experience with RCC and evaluate the association between tumor size and risk of metastases in a large cohort of patients.
Methods
Using our prospectively maintained nephrectomy database, we identified 2,691 patients treated surgically for a sporadic renal cortical tumor between 1989 and 2008. Associations between tumor size and synchronous metastases at presentation (M1 RCC) were evaluated with logistic regression models while metastases-free survival following surgery was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for 2,367 patients who did not present with M1 RCC and who were followed postoperatively.
Results
Among the 2,691 patients, 162 presented with metastatic RCC. Only 1 of 781 patients with a tumor <3cm had M1 RCC at presentation and tumor size was significantly associated with metastases at presentation (odds ratio 1.25 for each 1cm increase, p<0.001). Among the 2,367 patients who did not present with metastases, 171 developed metastatic disease during a median follow-up of 2.8 years. In this group, only 1 of the 720 patients with RCC <3cm developed a de novo metastases during follow-up. Metastases-free survival was significantly associated with tumor size (hazard ratio 1.24 for each 1cm increase, p<0.001).
Conclusion
In our experience, tumor size is significantly associated with synchronous metastases and asynchronous metastases following nephrectomy. Our results suggest that risk of metastatic disease for patients with tumors <3cm is negligible.
Comments
-
Screening
A year and one half ago I wrote reflections on my 70th birthday. One of those was that 70 years from now Stage 2,3 and 4 RCC will be eliminated by more advanced screening procedures One of these could be taken from Colon Cancer screening and that is that it should be standard for those of us over 50 to have an abdominal ultrasound which would identify most small Kidney Tumor's in the bud.
Icemantoo
0 -
Google nanitesicemantoo said:Screening
A year and one half ago I wrote reflections on my 70th birthday. One of those was that 70 years from now Stage 2,3 and 4 RCC will be eliminated by more advanced screening procedures One of these could be taken from Colon Cancer screening and that is that it should be standard for those of us over 50 to have an abdominal ultrasound which would identify most small Kidney Tumor's in the bud.
Icemantoo
Below is a link to an article I read about Google developing nanotechnology that would essentially monitor the blood constantly and alert you to chemical changes that occur when cancer forms. Pretty. Amazing. Stuff. Matches almost exactly a sci-fi story I wrote a few years back haha. Just shows that new tech is coming. Soon.
0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards