Not well enough for treatment
Comments
-
chemonancy591 said:ca125
Dont forget that inflammation can lead to a high ca125. Are you having any symptoms? I am still fighting my first recurrence and have been on chemo since January 2010. Most recently I've had huge ca125 jummps as well
GOOD LUCK!
Thanks for answering. The only symptoms I have are desperate thirst, mild nausea, constant trips to the toilet and excessive tiredness. I suppose more than anything I'm just scared I'm going to be taken off carbo/taxol because it worked so well for me before.0 -
chemonancy591 said:ca125
Dont forget that inflammation can lead to a high ca125. Are you having any symptoms? I am still fighting my first recurrence and have been on chemo since January 2010. Most recently I've had huge ca125 jummps as well
GOOD LUCK!
Is there any way to delete posts? This one went on twice. Don't know why0 -
Sorry if I don't have the
Sorry if I don't have the details down correctly, but it sounds like you were in remission for a year and are now being treated for your first recurrence, and have been prescribed Carbo/Taxol, the same combo you received as first line treatment. Is that right?
Any infection can cause a spike in your CA125, so I wouldn't worry too much about that. My CA125 at the time of my diagnosis was 4,000 and Leesa G's was 10,000 (she is such an over-achiever). Anyway, the CA125 number is not an indication of how much cancer you have.
Some of the chemo drugs are processed via the kidneys, so your doctor might indeed want to switch you to another one. There are plenty of them out there, so I'm sure they can find something that will zap the cancer, without killing off your vital organs. Sometimes that's a trick, in anc of itself. My doctor told me the idea is to pump enough poison in us to kill the cancer, but not so much that it kills the patient.
Let us know what your doctor says when you go back on Thursday.
Carlene0 -
Kidney count
My kidney count was up (Creatinine - CRE normal should be 0.6 to 1.2 milligrams) early on in treatment. In my case there was a tumor pushing on the ureter (seen on the CT) causing a blockage and the kidney count to elevate. They put in a stent, I lost 6 liters of water immediately, and kidney began functioning. I still have a stent in (goes from the bladder to the kidney) and although the tumor is no longer there, an adhesion has developed and it is safer to just keep the stent in. I have had a lot of chemo and although they always check the CRE, it has remained stable, and not interferred with getting chemo.
My friend's kidney shut down evetually from a blockage on the ureter, but she continued receiving chemo with only one kidney functioning.
I hope that your kidney problem is something that can be resolved, and you can continue our carbo/taxol.
Take care,
kathleen0 -
I didn't get chemokayandok said:Kidney count
My kidney count was up (Creatinine - CRE normal should be 0.6 to 1.2 milligrams) early on in treatment. In my case there was a tumor pushing on the ureter (seen on the CT) causing a blockage and the kidney count to elevate. They put in a stent, I lost 6 liters of water immediately, and kidney began functioning. I still have a stent in (goes from the bladder to the kidney) and although the tumor is no longer there, an adhesion has developed and it is safer to just keep the stent in. I have had a lot of chemo and although they always check the CRE, it has remained stable, and not interferred with getting chemo.
My friend's kidney shut down evetually from a blockage on the ureter, but she continued receiving chemo with only one kidney functioning.
I hope that your kidney problem is something that can be resolved, and you can continue our carbo/taxol.
Take care,
kathleen
I didn't get chemo after all. I had to have a CT scan, bloods tests etc. Apparently my blood work shows that my kidneys are improving and the scan shows several pockets of fluid which are pressing against my organs and what they think is a large cyst which is pressing against my bladder. I'm booked in for my carbo/taxol on Monday morning. Does anyone know whether delaying chemo for a week or so makes any difference to the outcome? I hope not0 -
I think it's fine.sarahb74 said:I didn't get chemo
I didn't get chemo after all. I had to have a CT scan, bloods tests etc. Apparently my blood work shows that my kidneys are improving and the scan shows several pockets of fluid which are pressing against my organs and what they think is a large cyst which is pressing against my bladder. I'm booked in for my carbo/taxol on Monday morning. Does anyone know whether delaying chemo for a week or so makes any difference to the outcome? I hope not
I think delaying a week is not a problem. I asked to delay round 4 of 6 so I could have an extra week to go camping last summer, and was told 1 week was fine.0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards