The Cancer Survivors Network (CSN) is a peer support community for cancer patients, survivors, caregivers, families, and friends! CSN is a safe place to connect with others who share your interests and experiences.

Thank you for being a part of the Cancer Survivor Network community. Survivors and caregivers like you have played a unique role in fostering an online environment that encourages connection among those needing support, community, and education. On May 28, the Network will be discontinued. More details are available here . If you have any questions, contact CSNSupportTeam@cancer.org. Thanks again for the support you’ve provided each other over the years. We remain committed to supporting you in other ways throughout your cancer journey.

Comparing CT Scans

Tico14
Tico14 CSN Member Posts: 72 Member
edited November 2023 in Lung Cancer #1

I have breathing issues. I had a CT with the VA 10 weeks ago. They found a 5cm opacity, a 9.2mm nodule and several other sub 5mm nodules. I was concerned about the 5 cm opacity. And, assumed the worst, which is why I'm posting in Lung Cancer.

Three weeks later I had another CT with a private pulmonologist. No mention of the 5cm opacity, the 9.2mm nodule much less the other sub 5 mm nodules.

Obviously different scanning units, different locations and different doctors, but is this even possible?

Comments

  • Tico14
    Tico14 CSN Member Posts: 72 Member

    Ended up answering my own question. The 5cm opacity was a typo and an error. A Pulmonologist actually took the time to show me several "slides" of my CT where he suspects the original reader of the CT made the mis-identification. It was a 5.7 MM probable asbestos related nodule! I need a drink.