Naproxen .... interesting.
Margie Clapper, PhD, Co-Leader of the Cancer Prevention and Control Program at Fox Chase, will present the data in a late-breaking abstract session at the AACR 102nd Annual Meeting 2011 on Wednesday, April 6.
“There is a major effect on the very small lesions, about a 90% reduction in the mutant mice treated with naproxen compared with control animals,” says Clapper. “That tells us this drug may be very appropriate for intervening early in people, far in advance of the development of large tumors. We might be able to have a significant impact on the very early and small lesions, thus reducing the morbidity associated with the disease.”
Scientists have shown previously that both naproxen and NO-naproxen kill colon cancer cells in culture, with NO-naproxen appearing to be more powerful than naproxen. In the current study, the team fed mice genetically predisposed to spontaneously develop colon tumors either regular food or food supplemented with high- or low-dose naproxen or high- or low-dose NO-naproxen. After 45 days, they found that mice fed low-dose naproxen had 70.3% fewer small tumors than the control animals and mice fed low-dose NO-naproxen had 64.0% fewer tumors than control animals. Moreover, a 89.3% reduction in very small tumors, known as microadenomas, was observed when mice were fed high-dose naproxen
Comments
-
Thanks Smokey.
I had to read
Thanks Smokey.
I had to read this a couple of times where it says "NO-naproxen appearing to be more powerful than naproxen". But then the percentages indicate naproxen more effective.
I'm sure I'm looking at it wrong......tired. Anyway, hoping, hoping, something good in the pipeline somewhere.
Always interesting.0 -
The "NO" isn't the wordjanie1 said:Thanks Smokey.
I had to read
Thanks Smokey.
I had to read this a couple of times where it says "NO-naproxen appearing to be more powerful than naproxen". But then the percentages indicate naproxen more effective.
I'm sure I'm looking at it wrong......tired. Anyway, hoping, hoping, something good in the pipeline somewhere.
Always interesting.
The "NO" isn't the word no...it stands for this (sorry if it was confusing) .........Researchers show that nitric oxide-donating naproxen can boost colorectal cancer prevention
April 21, 2010
Past randomized clinical trials have shown that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including naproxen, can reduce the risk of colon cancer and precancerous polyps in humans. Now, researchers at Fox Chase Cancer Center have found that an investigational form of naproxen, called nitric oxide-donating naproxen (NO-naproxen), can block one of the earliest molecular changes that lead to colorectal cancer development while also reducing gastrointestinal toxicity, a relatively common side effect associated with NSAIDs0 -
Hi Smokeysmokeyjoe said:The "NO" isn't the word
The "NO" isn't the word no...it stands for this (sorry if it was confusing) .........Researchers show that nitric oxide-donating naproxen can boost colorectal cancer prevention
April 21, 2010
Past randomized clinical trials have shown that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including naproxen, can reduce the risk of colon cancer and precancerous polyps in humans. Now, researchers at Fox Chase Cancer Center have found that an investigational form of naproxen, called nitric oxide-donating naproxen (NO-naproxen), can block one of the earliest molecular changes that lead to colorectal cancer development while also reducing gastrointestinal toxicity, a relatively common side effect associated with NSAIDs
Another coincidence for the accidental tourist of ca,I was on naprosyn for nearly twenty uears prior to my ca dx. It obviously did not stop the ca and it did not stop the polyps but my surgeon and onc were both surprised considering the aggression and lymph involvement that there were no mets. Ron.0 -
That's exactly what Iron50 said:Hi Smokey
Another coincidence for the accidental tourist of ca,I was on naprosyn for nearly twenty uears prior to my ca dx. It obviously did not stop the ca and it did not stop the polyps but my surgeon and onc were both surprised considering the aggression and lymph involvement that there were no mets. Ron.
That's exactly what I wondered if it would work on stopping mets..eliminating mets...stopping those cells that are floating about in our body!!!0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.9K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 793 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 540 Sarcoma
- 731 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards