Blood test to spot cancer (lung, breast, colon, prostrate); 4 Top centers to start using test this y

HeartofSoul
HeartofSoul Member Posts: 729 Member
edited March 2014 in Colorectal Cancer #1
This news can make a big difference.

http://www.usatoday.com/yourlife/health/medical/cancer/2011-01-03-blood-test-cancer_N.htm

BOSTON (AP) — A blood test so sensitive that it can spot a single cancer cell lurking among a billion healthy ones is moving one step closer to being available at your doctor's office.

Boston scientists who invented the test and health care giant Johnson & Johnson announced Monday that they are joining forces to bring it to market. Four big cancer centers also will start studies using the experimental test this year.

Stray cancer cells in the blood mean that a tumor has spread or is likely to, many doctors believe. A test that can capture such cells has the potential to transform care for many types of cancer, especially breast, prostate, colon and lung.

Initially, doctors want to use the test to try to predict what treatments would be best for each patient's tumor and find out quickly if they are working.

"This is like a liquid biopsy" that avoids painful tissue sampling and may give a better way to monitor patients than periodic imaging scans, said Dr. Daniel Haber, chief of Massachusetts General Hospital's cancer center and one of the test's inventors.
Ultimately, the test may offer a way to screen for cancer besides the mammograms, colonoscopies and other less-than-ideal methods used now.

"There's a lot of potential here, and that's why there's a lot of excitement," said Dr. Mark Kris, lung cancer chief at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York. He had no role in developing the test, but Sloan-Kettering is one of the sites that will study it this year.

Many people have their cancers diagnosed through needle biopsies. These often do not provide enough of a sample to determine what genes or pathways control a tumor's growth. Or the sample may no longer be available by the time the patient gets sent to a specialist to decide what treatment to prescribe.

Doctors typically give a drug or radiation treatment and then do a CT scan two months later to look for tumor shrinkage. Some patients only live long enough to try one or two treatments, so a test that can gauge success sooner, by looking at cancer cells in the blood, could give patients more options.

"If you could find out quickly, 'this drug is working, stay on it,' or 'this drug is not working, try something else,' that would be huge," Haber said.
The only test on the market now to find tumor cells in blood — CellSearch, made by J&J's Veridex unit — just gives a cell count. It doesn't capture whole cells that doctors can analyze to choose treatments.

Interest in trying to collect these cells soared in 2007, after Haber and his colleagues published a study of Mass General's test. It is far more powerful than CellSearch and traps cells intact. It requires only a couple of teaspoons of blood and can be done repeatedly to monitor treatment or determine why a drug has stopped working and what to try next.

"That's what got the scientific community's interest," Kris said. Doctors can give a drug one day and sample blood the next day to see if the circulating tumor cells are gone, he explained.

The test uses a microchip that resembles a lab slide covered in 78,000 tiny posts, like bristles on a hairbrush. The posts are coated with antibodies that bind to tumor cells. When blood is forced across the chip, cells ping off the posts like balls in a pinball machine. The cancer cells stick, and stains make them glow so researchers can count and capture them for study.

The test can find one cancer cell in a billion or more healthy cells, said Mehmet Toner, a Harvard University bioengineer who helped design it. Researchers know this because they spiked blood samples with cancer cells and then searched for them with the chip.

Studies of the chip have been published in the journals Nature, the New England Journal of Medicine and Science Translational Medicine. It is the most promising of several dozen that companies and universities are rushing to develop to capture circulating tumor cells, said Bob McCormack, technology chief for Veridex.

The agreement announced Monday calls for Veridex and J&J's Ortho Biotech Oncology unit to work on improving the microchip, including trying different designs and a cheaper plastic to make it practical for mass production. No price goal has been set, a company official said, but the current CellSearch test costs several hundred dollars.

The companies will start a research center at Mass General and will have rights to license the test from the hospital, which holds the patents.

In a separate effort, Mass General, Sloan-Kettering, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston will start using the test this year. They are one of the "dream teams" sharing a $15 million grant from the Stand Up to Cancer telethon, run by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Already, scientists have been surprised to find that more cancer patients harbor these stray cells than has been believed. In one study, the test was used on men thought to have cancer confined to the prostate, "but we found these cells in two-thirds of patients," Toner said.

This might mean that cancer cells enter the blood soon after a tumor starts, or that more cancers have already spread but are unseen by doctors.
Or it could mean something else entirely, because researchers have much to learn about these cells, said Dr. Minetta Liu, a breast cancer specialist at Georgetown University's Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center. She led a session on them at the recent San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium and has been a paid speaker for Veridex. She hopes the cells will someday aid cancer screening.

"The dream is, a woman comes in for her mammogram and gets a tube of blood drawn," so doctors can look for cancer cells in her blood as well as tumors on the imaging exam, she said.

That's still far off, but Mass General's test already is letting doctors monitor patients without painful biopsies. Like Greg Vrettos, who suffered a collapsed lung from a biopsy in 2004, when he was diagnosed with lung cancer.

"It had spread to both lungs and they couldn't operate," said Vrettos, 63, a nonsmoker and retired electrical engineer from Durham, N.H. Tests from the biopsy showed that he was a good candidate for the drug Iressa, which he has taken ever since. He goes to Boston every three months for CT scans and the blood test.

"They could look at the number of cancer cells and see that it dropped over time. It corresponded with what the scans were showing," Vrettos said of doctors looking at his blood tests.

The test also showed when he had a setback last January and needed to have his treatment adjusted.

"I think it's going to be revolutionary," he said of the test.

Comments

  • This comment has been removed by the Moderator
  • HeartofSoul
    HeartofSoul Member Posts: 729 Member
    unknown said:

    This comment has been removed by the Moderator

    CTC is current test and past
    CTC is current test and past (see below) which has limitations.

    The only test on the market now to find tumor cells in blood — CellSearch, made by J&J's Veridex unit — just gives a cell count. It doesn't capture whole cells that doctors can analyze to choose treatments.


    The new test had a study which was published in 2007 and is more powerful than CellSearch and traps cells intact. (see below)

    Interest in trying to collect these cells soared in 2007, after Haber and his colleagues published a study of Mass General's test. It is far more powerful than CellSearch and traps cells intact. It requires only a couple of teaspoons of blood and can be done repeatedly to monitor treatment or determine why a drug has stopped working and what to try next.
  • Annabelle41415
    Annabelle41415 Member Posts: 6,742 Member

    CTC is current test and past
    CTC is current test and past (see below) which has limitations.

    The only test on the market now to find tumor cells in blood — CellSearch, made by J&J's Veridex unit — just gives a cell count. It doesn't capture whole cells that doctors can analyze to choose treatments.


    The new test had a study which was published in 2007 and is more powerful than CellSearch and traps cells intact. (see below)

    Interest in trying to collect these cells soared in 2007, after Haber and his colleagues published a study of Mass General's test. It is far more powerful than CellSearch and traps cells intact. It requires only a couple of teaspoons of blood and can be done repeatedly to monitor treatment or determine why a drug has stopped working and what to try next.

    CTC
    If this blood test is now available why doesn't any doctor ever perform this? I've never had this blood test even offered to me and my bet is the insurance company won't pay for it either. Just my thought.

    Kim
  • HeartofSoul
    HeartofSoul Member Posts: 729 Member

    CTC
    If this blood test is now available why doesn't any doctor ever perform this? I've never had this blood test even offered to me and my bet is the insurance company won't pay for it either. Just my thought.

    Kim

    The article says only the
    I have not heard of CTC test either but ill ask my Med Oncologist about it and let you know what he said
  • Nana2
    Nana2 Member Posts: 255

    The article says only the
    I have not heard of CTC test either but ill ask my Med Oncologist about it and let you know what he said

    amazing. I was just
    amazing. I was just watching about it on the news as I was reading this.
  • CTC is current test and past
    CTC is current test and past (see below) which has limitations.

    The only test on the market now to find tumor cells in blood — CellSearch, made by J&J's Veridex unit — just gives a cell count. It doesn't capture whole cells that doctors can analyze to choose treatments.


    The new test had a study which was published in 2007 and is more powerful than CellSearch and traps cells intact. (see below)

    Interest in trying to collect these cells soared in 2007, after Haber and his colleagues published a study of Mass General's test. It is far more powerful than CellSearch and traps cells intact. It requires only a couple of teaspoons of blood and can be done repeatedly to monitor treatment or determine why a drug has stopped working and what to try next.

    This comment has been removed by the Moderator
  • HeartofSoul
    HeartofSoul Member Posts: 729 Member
    unknown said:

    This comment has been removed by the Moderator

    thanks for info on CTC test
    thanks for info on CTC test Kathy, glad your in NED
  • thanks for info on CTC test
    thanks for info on CTC test Kathy, glad your in NED

    This comment has been removed by the Moderator
  • chicoturner
    chicoturner Member Posts: 282

    CTC is current test and past
    CTC is current test and past (see below) which has limitations.

    The only test on the market now to find tumor cells in blood — CellSearch, made by J&J's Veridex unit — just gives a cell count. It doesn't capture whole cells that doctors can analyze to choose treatments.


    The new test had a study which was published in 2007 and is more powerful than CellSearch and traps cells intact. (see below)

    Interest in trying to collect these cells soared in 2007, after Haber and his colleagues published a study of Mass General's test. It is far more powerful than CellSearch and traps cells intact. It requires only a couple of teaspoons of blood and can be done repeatedly to monitor treatment or determine why a drug has stopped working and what to try next.

    Hi I read this article this
    Hi I read this article this morning and was quite jazzed! I am on trials now and am anxious to to see new drugs and tests out there. It could be a while, but, wow, we are on the way.
    Thanks for sharing. Jean
  • tootsie1
    tootsie1 Member Posts: 5,044 Member
    Sounds good!
    I was hearing about this today, and it sounds so promising. I really hope it pans out and brings some changes!

    *hugs*
    Gail
  • Kenny H.
    Kenny H. Member Posts: 502 Member
    tootsie1 said:

    Sounds good!
    I was hearing about this today, and it sounds so promising. I really hope it pans out and brings some changes!

    *hugs*
    Gail

    X2, Cant wait for ALL Drs to
    X2, Cant wait for ALL Drs to have access to this. Cant really afford to go to MD Anderson since I havent worked since last May.
  • C Dixon
    C Dixon Member Posts: 201

    thanks for info on CTC test
    thanks for info on CTC test Kathy, glad your in NED

    CTC
    My Onc used the CTC on me and it came back negative but three months later, I had a reccurrence. Now, the reccurrence was in old sites, so the test might still be valid, but my Doc's practice quit using it as they considered it too unreliable.

    Catherine