Breast cancer myths, debunked

HeartofSoul
HeartofSoul Member Posts: 729 Member
edited March 2014 in Breast Cancer #1
Breast cancer myths, debunked
So many rumors and controversies surround breast cancer—what really causes it, what really prevents it—that it can be hard to know whom to believe.

If you think that you're not at risk because there's no breast cancer in your family, you might be mistaken. The truth is that scientists still don't know what causes breast cancer—only that certain factors, such as obesity or drinking too much alcohol—may increase risk.

That's why Prevention has teamed up with a new organization called the Love/Avon Army of Women, whose mission is to help scientists better understand what causes breast cancer so we can prevent it once and for all.


Myth: Breast cancer is largely genetic
Fact: Just 5 to 10% of cases are due to faulty breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Even in women who have a family history, many cases are due not to specific gene mutations, according to the American Cancer Society, but, rather, to a combination of shared lifestyle factors and genetic susceptibilities. The truth is that scientists still have no idea what causes breast cancer. But one of the best ways to find out is to compare women who've never had it with those who have or who face an increased risk.

Myth: Small-chested women have a lower breast cancer risk
Fact: Your bra size doesn't play a role in whether or not you get breast cancer.

All breast cancers develop in the cells that line the ducts or lobules—the parts that make milk and carry it to the nipple—and all women have the same number of these, regardless of breast size. What makes breasts bigger or smaller is generally the amount of fat and stroma (fibrous tissue), which research shows have little impact on cancer odds. Bottom line: All women 40 and older need regular mammograms.

Myth: Breast cancer always appears as a lump
Fact: Approximately 10% of those diagnosed with breast cancer have no lumps, pain, or other indications of a problem in their breasts.

And among lumps that are detected, 80 to 85% are benign. They're often cysts or noncancerous tumors called fibroadenomas. That said, any lump or breast symptom (especially from the list below) that does not go away should be checked by a doctor.

• A change in how the breast or nipple feels or looks
• A lump or thickening in or near the breast or in the underarm area
• Breast pain or nipple tenderness
• A change in the size or shape of the breast
• A nipple or skin that turns inward into the breast
• Feeling warm to the touch
• Scaly, red, or swollen skin of the breast, areola, or nipple, perhaps with ridges or pitting that resembles an orange peel
• Nipple discharge

Myth: Mammograms prevent or reduce your risk
Fact: Regular mammograms will not prevent or reduce your risk of breast cancer.

They just detect breast cancer that already exists—reducing deaths among breast cancer patients by about 16%. However, most breast cancers have been present for 6 to 8 years by the time they appear on mammograms, and screening misses up to 20% of all tumors. That's why it's important that all women have an annual breast exam performed by a health care provider and pay close attention to their own bodies to spot potential changes as early as possible. Getting a high-quality mammogram and having a clinical breast exam on a regular basis are the most effective ways to detect breast cancer in its earliest stages, but we still need more information about how women can prevent it in the first place.


Myth: Mammograms cause breast cancer
Fact: The risk of harm from radiation is minuscule compared to the huge benefits of early detection.

The ACS recommends that women 40 and older have a mammogram every year. Radiation doses are regulated by the FDA and are fairly low—equivalent to the amount the average person receives from naturally occurring sources over 3 months. Also, women today receive 50 times less radiation from mammograms than they did 20 years ago, with the risk of long-term health effects being almost zero, according to the FDA. As each case of breast cancer is different, every woman should talk with her doctor about her personal risk factors for breast cancer. Those at high risk may need to start getting mammograms before age 40 or couple them with more sensitive screening methods, like MRI.

Myth: Birth control pills cause breast cancer
Fact: Doctors say the evidence isn't strong enough for them to recommend that women stop taking birth control pills to avoid breast cancer.

Some studies from the mid '90s showed that birth control users had a slightly increased risk, but researchers caution that pill formulations have changed since then (most contain much lower doses of the hormones linked to breast cancer risk).

This research also found that the risk returned to normal 10 years after women stopped taking the pills. Some research suggests that risk may depend on ethnicity or age (African-Americans and those who take pills after age 45 have a slightly increased risk), while other studies found no association between pills and cancer whatsoever. "This suggests that birth control–related breast cancer risk may not be the same for all women," says Susan Love, MD, a breast cancer surgeon and founder of the Army of Women, "which is why we need the Army of Women to help figure out whether subgroups have different risks."


Myth: Young women don't get breast cancer
Fact: While it's true the disease is more common in postmenopausal women, breast cancer can affect people of any age.

In fact, women under 50 account for 25% of all breast cancer cases, and they tend to have higher mortality rates. This may be partly explained by the fact that younger women tend to have denser breasts, which makes it harder to spot lumps during mammograms. Because of this, it's a good idea to perform monthly self breast exams starting at age 20, have a clinical exam by a doctor every 3 years, and start mammographic screening at age 40. If you have a family history of breast cancer, ask your doctor about also getting a breast MRI: Younger women who get breast cancer are more likely to have a mutation in the BRCA 1 or 2 genes than older women are, and one study found that MRI picked up 77% of cancers in these women, compared with 36% by mammography. If your doctor says you have dense breasts, request a digital mammogram, which found 15% more cancers than standard mammograms in women under 50 and 11% more in women with dense breasts in a 2005 study.


Myth: I had a normal mammogram, so I don't need to worry about breast cancer
Fact: Mammograms offer our best means of early detection—current guidelines still recommend them annually for women 40 and older—but they're not perfect.

Research shows they can miss up to 20% of breast cancers in women who don't have any symptoms. mammography reduces a woman's risk of dying from breast cancer by only 16%, according to the Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation. And just because one exam comes back normal doesn't mean breast cancer won't develop later—which is why current guidelines call for mammograms annually. To be safe, do self breast exams, paying particular attention to any changes in how your breasts look or feel. Women under 40 should have a clinical exam done every 3 years. Women 40 and older should get one yearly, along with a mammogram. Ask your doctor about the latest screening technology: Digital mammograms detected 15% more cancers in women under age 50 and 11% more in women with dense breasts, according to one study, and digital MRIs picked up 77% of cancers in women with a genetic mutation, compared with 36% detected by mammography. An MRI should be used in conjunction with, not instead of, a mammogram, according to the ACS.

Myth: Breast cancer is preventable
Fact: Although you can certainly address certain risk factors like obesity and inactivity, there's not enough information about what causes breast cancer for women to prevent it completely.

"There is a difference between things that are associated with a higher risk of breast cancer, such as obesity after menopause and alcohol, and what actually causes cancer," says Love. "It is likely that these are not the cause but either promote it or are in some way linked with it." A drug called Tamoxifen may reduce the risk of breast cancer in certain high-risk women—although more research is needed for treatments that apply to the general population—and double mastectomies can reduce the risk of breast cancer by more than 90% in women with a very high risk. To prevent breast cancer once and for all, more research is needed—especially studies that examine differences between women who get it and those who don't.

Comments

  • Rague
    Rague Member Posts: 3,653 Member
    Not all TYPES of BC fall into the 'generalizations'.
    All types breast cancer are not created equal! There is no 'one size fits all'. Granted - there are some similarities with some but not all follow the usual 'rules'.
  • Dawne.Hope
    Dawne.Hope Member Posts: 823
    I saw these 'myths' on the
    I saw these 'myths' on the MSN homepage this morning and it makes me ANGRY!

    I attended a young survivor's bc conference sponsed by the Siteman Center in St. Louis and there was a genetic scientist there who said that most cancer IS caused by genetics, but the truth is there hasn't been enough research to find them out. Most of the money has been spent on trying to treat the disease than finding out the why. More and more YOUNG women are getting bc while yes, pesticides, hormones in our food ... all of that has to a part to play but when an 18 year old woman gets breast cancer there is a whole lot more than environmental factors involved.

    I found the 'studies' that debunked the myths in the above article to be rather sketchy. Any scientist will tell you that it takes more than one study to de-bunk a myth and that is what the above article does. I don't trust it and I don't think it is true.

    Scary.
  • Dawne.Hope
    Dawne.Hope Member Posts: 823

    I saw these 'myths' on the
    I saw these 'myths' on the MSN homepage this morning and it makes me ANGRY!

    I attended a young survivor's bc conference sponsed by the Siteman Center in St. Louis and there was a genetic scientist there who said that most cancer IS caused by genetics, but the truth is there hasn't been enough research to find them out. Most of the money has been spent on trying to treat the disease than finding out the why. More and more YOUNG women are getting bc while yes, pesticides, hormones in our food ... all of that has to a part to play but when an 18 year old woman gets breast cancer there is a whole lot more than environmental factors involved.

    I found the 'studies' that debunked the myths in the above article to be rather sketchy. Any scientist will tell you that it takes more than one study to de-bunk a myth and that is what the above article does. I don't trust it and I don't think it is true.

    Scary.

    Dr. Paul Goodfellow
    is a genetic researcher and he's dedicated the second half of his life to finding more genetic links to breast cancer. Thank God for men and women like him who don't believe in 'the research' quoted in the MSN article.

    http://outlook.wustl.edu/summer2007/cancer.htm
  • shy violet
    shy violet Member Posts: 167
    Don't care for those words
    Army of Women?? Is that the politically correct way of saying human research animals...
  • MAJW
    MAJW Member Posts: 2,510 Member
    Dr. Susan Love
    I have read numerous articles, authored by her.....She has stated.....don't bother with MONTHLY self exams....they just upset women when they find something...it leads to stress and unneccessary testing.....and she's stated that women don't need mammograms until age 50...I read these particular quotes of hers in REDBOOK magazine a few months ago.....I was seething!.....the more of things written by her the angrier I get! If I had followed HER advice, I'd probably be dead!
  • cahjah75
    cahjah75 Member Posts: 2,631
    I started
    to read Dr. Susan Love's Breast Book and she does say those things about looking for and finding lumps and unnecessary testing....... I have to say I learned way too late (I'm 61) things I didn't know about my own body. Today as the start of Breast Cancer Awareness Month I am especially grateful to this website where I have met fellow sisters in the journey of bc. The wisdom, compassion and encouragement is amazing!
    Char
  • cookie97
    cookie97 Member Posts: 200
    cahjah75 said:

    I started
    to read Dr. Susan Love's Breast Book and she does say those things about looking for and finding lumps and unnecessary testing....... I have to say I learned way too late (I'm 61) things I didn't know about my own body. Today as the start of Breast Cancer Awareness Month I am especially grateful to this website where I have met fellow sisters in the journey of bc. The wisdom, compassion and encouragement is amazing!
    Char

    Debunking Myths
    There are two women in my life that were dxd with breast cancer; niether one DRANK alcohol one was large breasted the other not! I was told that because I was a small breasted woman when I was in my 40's that I was at a low risk? Guess the male doc's preferred to look at bigger boobs. Couldn't be bothered with me and now I'm stage 4.
    Gotta love the researchers; big breasts only!

    Peace and Love,
    Edie
  • TraciInLA
    TraciInLA Member Posts: 1,994 Member

    Don't care for those words
    Army of Women?? Is that the politically correct way of saying human research animals...

    Proud member of the Army of Women
    I've been a proud member of the Army of Women for over a year now, which simply means that I receive regular email notices of new and ongoing studies related to breast cancer, and am given the option to participate in a study or not. Completely voluntary -- I'm not pressured in any way, and don't feel like a human research animal at all.

    The study I'm currently a part of is a National Cancer Institute beta-test of web-based educational/support materials for women completing treatment for breast cancer. I've found much of the material very helpful myself, so it's a nice bonus to help myself while hopefully also giving input that will help women who come after me.

    Traci
  • cathyp
    cathyp Member Posts: 376 Member
    Fact
    If you were treated with radiation at a young age for Hodgkins Lymphoma or for any other reason, you chances of developing BC are at least 4 times more than the general population.
  • VickiSam
    VickiSam Member Posts: 9,079 Member
    cathyp said:

    Fact
    If you were treated with radiation at a young age for Hodgkins Lymphoma or for any other reason, you chances of developing BC are at least 4 times more than the general population.

    You are you own best advocate ..
    plain and simple .. Know your body, and question anything that does not sit right with you! I felt a lump in my breast, my GYNO did not, his NPR did -- funny? I could of been stage III or IV if I waited a year for another mammo.

    I developed thyroid cancer in my teens -- radiation etc .. so I have learned to know, listen and question. No report, research or doctor will tell me otherwise.


    Vicki Sam
  • shy violet
    shy violet Member Posts: 167
    VickiSam said:

    You are you own best advocate ..
    plain and simple .. Know your body, and question anything that does not sit right with you! I felt a lump in my breast, my GYNO did not, his NPR did -- funny? I could of been stage III or IV if I waited a year for another mammo.

    I developed thyroid cancer in my teens -- radiation etc .. so I have learned to know, listen and question. No report, research or doctor will tell me otherwise.


    Vicki Sam

    Vickisam you are SO
    Vickisam you are SO right...I went to the onc because I found a small lump...they couldn't find it, so I guided her hand directly to it. I was surprised when she said it's just leftover scar type stuff (forgive me it was more technical than that just can't recall her words now) and said with 100% certainty it was not anything to worry about. The cancer team is very up to date and very top notch...she said well lets go ahead and biopsy it, but I'm sure we're good on this...
    No we were not good on this, it was cancer and a second one was subsequently found, and spread. I am not bitter, just certain that you must manage your health and not say ok if you know something is wrong...love, shy
  • SIROD
    SIROD Member Posts: 2,194 Member
    If You Have Breast, You Are At Risk! Even Men.
    One other truth that wasn't included is that men can and do die from breast cancer. It is a small percentage about 1% I think. Doctors don't look for breast cancer in men and when they do learn that they have it, it's to late.

    Another percentage of at risk women are those pregnant or breast feeding. A lot of these women usually have inflammatory breast cancer. They are often thought to have mastitis instead.
  • SIROD
    SIROD Member Posts: 2,194 Member
    MAJW said:

    Dr. Susan Love
    I have read numerous articles, authored by her.....She has stated.....don't bother with MONTHLY self exams....they just upset women when they find something...it leads to stress and unneccessary testing.....and she's stated that women don't need mammograms until age 50...I read these particular quotes of hers in REDBOOK magazine a few months ago.....I was seething!.....the more of things written by her the angrier I get! If I had followed HER advice, I'd probably be dead!

    Do Your Own Research
    Dear MAJW,

    I've been a fan of Dr. Susan Love for over 16 years. I respect her knowledge immensely. Did you know Dr. Love also had breast cancer?

    I am certain if you reread the article in REDBOOK, you would find what your remember isn't correct.

    The reason for mammograms given to older women vs younger women is that their breast tissue is less dense. A mammogram is just one of the many tools. Many breast cancers don't show up on mammograms. It's far from a perfect tool.

    I found the best person to do research is oneself. No one but you is as interested!

    Best,

    SIROD
  • SIROD
    SIROD Member Posts: 2,194 Member

    Don't care for those words
    Army of Women?? Is that the politically correct way of saying human research animals...

    Army of Women
    Dear Shy Violet,

    You need to read up on this Army.

    Research begins with a very small mammal and continues up the chain to us. TRIALS.
  • SIROD
    SIROD Member Posts: 2,194 Member

    I saw these 'myths' on the
    I saw these 'myths' on the MSN homepage this morning and it makes me ANGRY!

    I attended a young survivor's bc conference sponsed by the Siteman Center in St. Louis and there was a genetic scientist there who said that most cancer IS caused by genetics, but the truth is there hasn't been enough research to find them out. Most of the money has been spent on trying to treat the disease than finding out the why. More and more YOUNG women are getting bc while yes, pesticides, hormones in our food ... all of that has to a part to play but when an 18 year old woman gets breast cancer there is a whole lot more than environmental factors involved.

    I found the 'studies' that debunked the myths in the above article to be rather sketchy. Any scientist will tell you that it takes more than one study to de-bunk a myth and that is what the above article does. I don't trust it and I don't think it is true.

    Scary.

    Dear Dawne.Hope,
    Breast

    Dear Dawne.Hope,

    Breast cancer is the oldest recorded cancer in all of history. Women back in 490 B.C. had the disease and it goes on and on, chain like through the centuries.

    Cause! Why worry about a cause, how about finding a way to cure it. One gene at a time. There will never be one cure as breast cancer has to many variations.

    I trust the debunking of the myths, because "Why" when you have the disease is irrelevant!

    SIROD
  • New Flower
    New Flower Member Posts: 4,294
    MAJW said:

    Dr. Susan Love
    I have read numerous articles, authored by her.....She has stated.....don't bother with MONTHLY self exams....they just upset women when they find something...it leads to stress and unneccessary testing.....and she's stated that women don't need mammograms until age 50...I read these particular quotes of hers in REDBOOK magazine a few months ago.....I was seething!.....the more of things written by her the angrier I get! If I had followed HER advice, I'd probably be dead!

    If you find "Why" than you will be able to prevent
    Prevention is very important for both healthy and survivors. Prevention as highly important asI treatment. Unfortunately, medical community and pharmaceutical companies more interested in treatment than prevention of primary and recurrence. Most of the clinical studies were done with postmenopausal women.Majority of clinical scientists and doctors, including Dr. Love, did not pay any attention to premenopausal/young patients under 50. I could not find any suitable answers on her website regarding hormonal therapy for premenopausal women.
    Dr. Love was a very famous breast surgeon, a founder of Revlon Breast center at UCLA. She stopped performing surgeries about 10 years ago and has been completely focusing on breast cancer education, popularization, and clinical studies. Her recent comments have shown disconnect with real patient care.
  • Dawne.Hope
    Dawne.Hope Member Posts: 823
    SIROD said:

    Dear Dawne.Hope,
    Breast

    Dear Dawne.Hope,

    Breast cancer is the oldest recorded cancer in all of history. Women back in 490 B.C. had the disease and it goes on and on, chain like through the centuries.

    Cause! Why worry about a cause, how about finding a way to cure it. One gene at a time. There will never be one cure as breast cancer has to many variations.

    I trust the debunking of the myths, because "Why" when you have the disease is irrelevant!

    SIROD

    Herceptin
    The 'why' finds cures.

    It was genetics that led researches to the drug herceptin. Herceptin is now saving lives. You wouldn't have it had there not been the research for the 'why.'
  • Dawne.Hope
    Dawne.Hope Member Posts: 823

    If you find "Why" than you will be able to prevent
    Prevention is very important for both healthy and survivors. Prevention as highly important asI treatment. Unfortunately, medical community and pharmaceutical companies more interested in treatment than prevention of primary and recurrence. Most of the clinical studies were done with postmenopausal women.Majority of clinical scientists and doctors, including Dr. Love, did not pay any attention to premenopausal/young patients under 50. I could not find any suitable answers on her website regarding hormonal therapy for premenopausal women.
    Dr. Love was a very famous breast surgeon, a founder of Revlon Breast center at UCLA. She stopped performing surgeries about 10 years ago and has been completely focusing on breast cancer education, popularization, and clinical studies. Her recent comments have shown disconnect with real patient care.

    AGREE!
    The whole pre-menopausaul post-menopausaul issue on bc is HUGE!

    And the research is just beginning. An 18 year old with bc is a much different case than a 70 year old with bc ... but if you read the stats, they treat it the same. Shouldn't be that way.