Got my CA125: went UP from 71.5 to 78.3, even though I'm getting taxol weekly. :(
Comments
-
Connie: about the lymph nodes & surgical removalunknown said:This comment has been removed by the Moderator
I was Google-ing different things and can't remember excatly where I read this. But I read an interesting article about removing cancerous lymph nodes that was about metastic breast cancer but still seems to directly relate to me (and others of us with mets to lymph nodes). The article was arguing AGAINST the removal of the cancerous lymph nodes in the armpit (where my largest one is). It explained that the cancer cells that get caught in the lymph node are 'sticky' cancer cells, and that these 'sticky' cancer cells are unlikely to move on OUT of the lymph node even though they may multiple in that node. But it went on to say that just because you have sticky cancer cells doesn't mean ALL of your cancer cells are sticky like that, quite the contrary. Meanwhile other less sticky cells get past the lymph system and have already probably moved on to other parts of your body in microscopic form, waiting to make mischief for you elsewhere. So the article said that removing the cancerous lymph node just gives you a false sense of having struck a significant blow against the cancer; you haven't really. And the surgery can cause its own side affects and lose time when you could have been getting systemic chemo attacking those microscopic cells.
Seems a good argument for your IP chemo though!0 -
This comment has been removed by the Moderatorlindaprocopio said:Connie: about the lymph nodes & surgical removal
I was Google-ing different things and can't remember excatly where I read this. But I read an interesting article about removing cancerous lymph nodes that was about metastic breast cancer but still seems to directly relate to me (and others of us with mets to lymph nodes). The article was arguing AGAINST the removal of the cancerous lymph nodes in the armpit (where my largest one is). It explained that the cancer cells that get caught in the lymph node are 'sticky' cancer cells, and that these 'sticky' cancer cells are unlikely to move on OUT of the lymph node even though they may multiple in that node. But it went on to say that just because you have sticky cancer cells doesn't mean ALL of your cancer cells are sticky like that, quite the contrary. Meanwhile other less sticky cells get past the lymph system and have already probably moved on to other parts of your body in microscopic form, waiting to make mischief for you elsewhere. So the article said that removing the cancerous lymph node just gives you a false sense of having struck a significant blow against the cancer; you haven't really. And the surgery can cause its own side affects and lose time when you could have been getting systemic chemo attacking those microscopic cells.
Seems a good argument for your IP chemo though!0 -
Lindalindaprocopio said:My OFFICIAL CT/PET results
At my appointment today, my chemo-onc said that it looks like the taxol chemo I was getting has stopped working. My CA125 went up again, from 78 to 83 in the past week. I was hoping my August CT/PET scan would be clear, and would signal a chemo break for me, but that is not going to happen now.
The official GOOD NEWS is that last Thursday's CT/PET showed that my cancer is still contained in the same couple of lymph nodes that it was on my last CT/PET scan 3 months ago, with no spread anywhere!! The bad news is that the lymph node under my arm is bigger (now over 2 cm) and lit up MUCH brighter on the PET scan, with an SUV of 17, which is significant (!!!) metabolic activity. And the para-aortic node that lit up last time, although still tiny (4 mm) is none-the-less larger and lit up again.
The 3 oncologists on my local cancer team are still not recommending surgery, but my husband and I want to get an outside opinion before we totally let go of that idea. My chemo-oncologist suggested the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia (about a 3 hour drive from here) and a Dr. Mark Morgan (Google him), a gynecologist-oncologist and surgeon that specializes in complicated cancers like mine. He gave us his phone number and the procedure to get my CT/PET scans and pathology reports to Fox Chase, and suggested that I start that process right away. Meanwhile I have a standing appointment with my local gynecologic oncologist Friday and will get his opinion of my scan and his recommendations to factor in.
My chemo-oncologist felt I could safely take a couple of weeks to get opinions and make a decision on any surgery before we talk about chemo options. He and I already talked about it as soon as my CA125 started rising, with Doxil the focus of the conversation. But today he threw out the idea of Carboplatin, which I took before in late 2008/early 2009 and was effective for me. He said he'd be interested in what chemo drug this Dr. Morgan from Fox Chase would recommend.
In explaining why he is recommending against surgery, my chemo-oncologist did say that typically a cancer like mine that has metastasized to the lymph nodes is already traveling freely via my blood stream and probably already microscopically seeded elsewhere. So cutting out visible cancer won't be curative and could cause complications. But I just want to make sure I leave no stone unturned, so I want the 2nd opinion (which my chemo-onc seemed to be encouraging). Surprisingly Fox Chase is in my insurance primary coverage service area, so I'll be covered if I have surgery or any treatments there. I hate to make this harder getting another opinion, but that way everyone in my family saying "Get it cut out" can be at peace with the next treatment protocol. I'll keep you posted!
Sending hugs and prayers girlfriend....things need to get easier for you some time soon...
Laurie0 -
Hang in there Ms.Linda~TiggersDoBounce said:Linda
Sending hugs and prayers girlfriend....things need to get easier for you some time soon...
Laurie
You've really got this path of action figured out... I wish you nothing but the best and know you're a trooper who will and can endure all....
((( hugs )))
xoxoxox
Jan0 -
on reading linda's posts: i hate cancer!!!!lindaprocopio said:Connie: about the lymph nodes & surgical removal
I was Google-ing different things and can't remember excatly where I read this. But I read an interesting article about removing cancerous lymph nodes that was about metastic breast cancer but still seems to directly relate to me (and others of us with mets to lymph nodes). The article was arguing AGAINST the removal of the cancerous lymph nodes in the armpit (where my largest one is). It explained that the cancer cells that get caught in the lymph node are 'sticky' cancer cells, and that these 'sticky' cancer cells are unlikely to move on OUT of the lymph node even though they may multiple in that node. But it went on to say that just because you have sticky cancer cells doesn't mean ALL of your cancer cells are sticky like that, quite the contrary. Meanwhile other less sticky cells get past the lymph system and have already probably moved on to other parts of your body in microscopic form, waiting to make mischief for you elsewhere. So the article said that removing the cancerous lymph node just gives you a false sense of having struck a significant blow against the cancer; you haven't really. And the surgery can cause its own side affects and lose time when you could have been getting systemic chemo attacking those microscopic cells.
Seems a good argument for your IP chemo though!
linda,
i'm almost at a loss for words in response to all you've been going through (and certainly others here as well). i hate your cancer, i hate mine, and i hate all of ours. i know some sisters have said that cancer has brought them increased appreciation for life, and i'm happy for those for whom that's happened. i personally can't think of one benefit cancer has brought me, even though i've had wonderful doctors, nurses, hospitals, and found the best possible sisters here. i hate all the worry and anxiety about every new pain, all the treatments which can save/prolong our lives, but do their own damage to our precious bodies, all the tests and scans, not without their own dangers, not being able to plan more than 3 or 6 months in advance, having to make possibly life and death decisions with complicated, incomplete information, hearing about dear ones sick and or falling by the wayside. it never ends.....
i, too, have a slightly enlarged para aortic node, which i am leaving strictly alone. i've heard something similar about not removing those nodes, though not exactly what you've reported, but close. i just want to add my voice to the chorus of others here who so appreciate you, linda, and are thinking of you and wishing only good results for you (and some good luck right about now). i'm with you when you say you don't want to leave any stone unturned; then you can hopefully have some peace knowing you've amassed as much information as there is to get before you make any decisions. whatever you decide to do, however, know that i, and i'm sure i speak for so many here, are 100% behind you. i know you'll keep us posted.
hugs and sisterhood,
maggie0 -
Lindajazzy1 said:Hang in there Ms.Linda~
You've really got this path of action figured out... I wish you nothing but the best and know you're a trooper who will and can endure all....
((( hugs )))
xoxoxox
Jan
I am sending you love, light and prayers for healing. Your positive energy and the love you have freely given to all on this discussion board have been a wonderful influence for me as I have been going down this path.0 -
Is directed radiation oflindaprocopio said:Connie: about the lymph nodes & surgical removal
I was Google-ing different things and can't remember excatly where I read this. But I read an interesting article about removing cancerous lymph nodes that was about metastic breast cancer but still seems to directly relate to me (and others of us with mets to lymph nodes). The article was arguing AGAINST the removal of the cancerous lymph nodes in the armpit (where my largest one is). It explained that the cancer cells that get caught in the lymph node are 'sticky' cancer cells, and that these 'sticky' cancer cells are unlikely to move on OUT of the lymph node even though they may multiple in that node. But it went on to say that just because you have sticky cancer cells doesn't mean ALL of your cancer cells are sticky like that, quite the contrary. Meanwhile other less sticky cells get past the lymph system and have already probably moved on to other parts of your body in microscopic form, waiting to make mischief for you elsewhere. So the article said that removing the cancerous lymph node just gives you a false sense of having struck a significant blow against the cancer; you haven't really. And the surgery can cause its own side affects and lose time when you could have been getting systemic chemo attacking those microscopic cells.
Seems a good argument for your IP chemo though!
Is directed radiation of those 2 nodes an option?0 -
No appt. yet at Fox Chase, but VERY informative appt locally.unknown said:This comment has been removed by the Moderator
I picked up the CD that my local hospital made of all my 2010 CT/PETs and that needle biopsy to take with me to Fox Chase, but they haven't called me yet with an appointment. I will call them Monday if I don't hear from them today. Meanwhile I had an appointment for my 3-month regular internal with my gyne-onc this morning, and I'm still shaken by our frank conversation. The GOOD NEWS is that all look good from my internal/rectal physical exam. But the rest of the conversation was information (almost TMI!) and disturbing.
We talked about my assumption that if we leave the underarm lymph node in, it may grow larger and start causing me pain, but that by then my platelet and nuetrofils will be too compromised by the chemo for them to safely do surgery. My gyne-onc said that is a possibility of course and that if that node grows uncontrolled it could press on a nerve and possible cause me to lose some use of that arm. (!!!!???!!!) We talked about the extended overall survival of having salvage surgery that would remove all measurable evidence of the cancer, which I had read in a recent study increases the statistical overall survival from 13 months to 30 months. For me that would also involve removing that para-aortic lymph node that keeps lighting up on every other PET scan. He said that my involved para-aortic node is right by an artery (which I assume is what para-aortic means, right???) and very close to my spine and 1 kidney and that this would be extensive dangerous surgery. I knew that, but he went on to say, "but if we can't get that node under control and it keeps growing it could press on your spine and cause some paralysis (!!!???!!!) ; or if it gets into that aorta I don't even want to paint you that scenario." (!!!???!!!) He said that the Geisinger tumor board was advising against the dual surgery for me because I probably would still have microscopic cancer cells elsewhere and still have cancer, and would probably need 5 to 6 weeks to heal from surgery before I was able to get back into chemo. He said that he had recommended radiation of both areas for me, but that my radiation-onc was against that. And he said if Fox Chase recommended surgery for me, and I wanted to go for it, he would advocate for me at Geisinger for them to do the surgery, because my case is so unusual and I am so strong.
I asked about the taxol and why it stopped working for me after 23 rounds total. He said when they prescribe a chemo that attacks through the front door, after time the cancer learns to shut that front door; and then they have to attack through a back door or a window (by trying a new chemo). He said sometimes the cancer learns to shut ALL the doors and windows at once, and no chemo will work, but that we currently have no reason to believe that is true for me. And he said that after several other chemos we may even be able to go BACK to taxol as the cancer will no longer be able to keep the front door shut (t push that analogy).
Seems like a 'damned if you do; damned if you don't scenario. I'm anxious to see what Fox Chase has to say and have no idea whether I want surgery now or what to do. But I am glad to be getting a clear picture of my options. Still, Id never thought about some of the grim things that could happen if chemo or radiation or surgery can't get those lymph nodes under control, and it is scary for sure.0 -
This comment has been removed by the Moderatorlindaprocopio said:No appt. yet at Fox Chase, but VERY informative appt locally.
I picked up the CD that my local hospital made of all my 2010 CT/PETs and that needle biopsy to take with me to Fox Chase, but they haven't called me yet with an appointment. I will call them Monday if I don't hear from them today. Meanwhile I had an appointment for my 3-month regular internal with my gyne-onc this morning, and I'm still shaken by our frank conversation. The GOOD NEWS is that all look good from my internal/rectal physical exam. But the rest of the conversation was information (almost TMI!) and disturbing.
We talked about my assumption that if we leave the underarm lymph node in, it may grow larger and start causing me pain, but that by then my platelet and nuetrofils will be too compromised by the chemo for them to safely do surgery. My gyne-onc said that is a possibility of course and that if that node grows uncontrolled it could press on a nerve and possible cause me to lose some use of that arm. (!!!!???!!!) We talked about the extended overall survival of having salvage surgery that would remove all measurable evidence of the cancer, which I had read in a recent study increases the statistical overall survival from 13 months to 30 months. For me that would also involve removing that para-aortic lymph node that keeps lighting up on every other PET scan. He said that my involved para-aortic node is right by an artery (which I assume is what para-aortic means, right???) and very close to my spine and 1 kidney and that this would be extensive dangerous surgery. I knew that, but he went on to say, "but if we can't get that node under control and it keeps growing it could press on your spine and cause some paralysis (!!!???!!!) ; or if it gets into that aorta I don't even want to paint you that scenario." (!!!???!!!) He said that the Geisinger tumor board was advising against the dual surgery for me because I probably would still have microscopic cancer cells elsewhere and still have cancer, and would probably need 5 to 6 weeks to heal from surgery before I was able to get back into chemo. He said that he had recommended radiation of both areas for me, but that my radiation-onc was against that. And he said if Fox Chase recommended surgery for me, and I wanted to go for it, he would advocate for me at Geisinger for them to do the surgery, because my case is so unusual and I am so strong.
I asked about the taxol and why it stopped working for me after 23 rounds total. He said when they prescribe a chemo that attacks through the front door, after time the cancer learns to shut that front door; and then they have to attack through a back door or a window (by trying a new chemo). He said sometimes the cancer learns to shut ALL the doors and windows at once, and no chemo will work, but that we currently have no reason to believe that is true for me. And he said that after several other chemos we may even be able to go BACK to taxol as the cancer will no longer be able to keep the front door shut (t push that analogy).
Seems like a 'damned if you do; damned if you don't scenario. I'm anxious to see what Fox Chase has to say and have no idea whether I want surgery now or what to do. But I am glad to be getting a clear picture of my options. Still, Id never thought about some of the grim things that could happen if chemo or radiation or surgery can't get those lymph nodes under control, and it is scary for sure.0 -
Still in the Gamelindaprocopio said:No appt. yet at Fox Chase, but VERY informative appt locally.
I picked up the CD that my local hospital made of all my 2010 CT/PETs and that needle biopsy to take with me to Fox Chase, but they haven't called me yet with an appointment. I will call them Monday if I don't hear from them today. Meanwhile I had an appointment for my 3-month regular internal with my gyne-onc this morning, and I'm still shaken by our frank conversation. The GOOD NEWS is that all look good from my internal/rectal physical exam. But the rest of the conversation was information (almost TMI!) and disturbing.
We talked about my assumption that if we leave the underarm lymph node in, it may grow larger and start causing me pain, but that by then my platelet and nuetrofils will be too compromised by the chemo for them to safely do surgery. My gyne-onc said that is a possibility of course and that if that node grows uncontrolled it could press on a nerve and possible cause me to lose some use of that arm. (!!!!???!!!) We talked about the extended overall survival of having salvage surgery that would remove all measurable evidence of the cancer, which I had read in a recent study increases the statistical overall survival from 13 months to 30 months. For me that would also involve removing that para-aortic lymph node that keeps lighting up on every other PET scan. He said that my involved para-aortic node is right by an artery (which I assume is what para-aortic means, right???) and very close to my spine and 1 kidney and that this would be extensive dangerous surgery. I knew that, but he went on to say, "but if we can't get that node under control and it keeps growing it could press on your spine and cause some paralysis (!!!???!!!) ; or if it gets into that aorta I don't even want to paint you that scenario." (!!!???!!!) He said that the Geisinger tumor board was advising against the dual surgery for me because I probably would still have microscopic cancer cells elsewhere and still have cancer, and would probably need 5 to 6 weeks to heal from surgery before I was able to get back into chemo. He said that he had recommended radiation of both areas for me, but that my radiation-onc was against that. And he said if Fox Chase recommended surgery for me, and I wanted to go for it, he would advocate for me at Geisinger for them to do the surgery, because my case is so unusual and I am so strong.
I asked about the taxol and why it stopped working for me after 23 rounds total. He said when they prescribe a chemo that attacks through the front door, after time the cancer learns to shut that front door; and then they have to attack through a back door or a window (by trying a new chemo). He said sometimes the cancer learns to shut ALL the doors and windows at once, and no chemo will work, but that we currently have no reason to believe that is true for me. And he said that after several other chemos we may even be able to go BACK to taxol as the cancer will no longer be able to keep the front door shut (t push that analogy).
Seems like a 'damned if you do; damned if you don't scenario. I'm anxious to see what Fox Chase has to say and have no idea whether I want surgery now or what to do. But I am glad to be getting a clear picture of my options. Still, Id never thought about some of the grim things that could happen if chemo or radiation or surgery can't get those lymph nodes under control, and it is scary for sure.
OK - look at it this way......there are still options out there......so basically it's still a wait and see type prognosis. I know if it were me, I'd be just like you: cut it out and cut it out now! So you wait and see what comes next and next will start with your appointment at Fox Chase. And you know what.......you may also want to check with MD Anderson here in Texas! Now that you've gotten copies of your labs/scans/reports - keep a set for yourself!
Keep strong!
Terri0 -
Another tidbit I forgot that the oncology nurse said.howdybooth said:Still in the Game
OK - look at it this way......there are still options out there......so basically it's still a wait and see type prognosis. I know if it were me, I'd be just like you: cut it out and cut it out now! So you wait and see what comes next and next will start with your appointment at Fox Chase. And you know what.......you may also want to check with MD Anderson here in Texas! Now that you've gotten copies of your labs/scans/reports - keep a set for yourself!
Keep strong!
Terri
Because my gyne-ons is also the head of Women's Health & a very big shot at the hospital, he first has an oncology nurse or P.A. come in and talk through everything with the patient. Because I was getting my PET scan last week, we skipped chemo, and we are skipping chemo until after my 2nd opinion on the surgery. I told the 'assistant' that I was concerned to be NOT getting chemo these past couple of weeks and perhaps a couple more weeks until I get to Fox Chase, because the lymph node under my arm was growing and lit up on the PET scan an incredible 17 (& I know anything lighting up brighter than 3.5 SUV is considered probably malignant). She said a very high uptake like that meant that the cancer there is dividing very rapidly & that's why it sucks up the glucose solution given for the PET, because it needs the sugar to support the rapid celll division. But what was interesting is that she said "That's probably why they all want you to do chemo instead of surgery: WHEN CELLS ARE DIVIDING VERY RAPIDLY, CHEMO WORKS AT ITS BEST." And I can see the sense of that, as some chemos kill just as the cells divide, and other chemos interrupt the cell division process, etc. Anyhow, I take this to mean if you have a high SUV # on your PET, chemo may be a really effective option. Just an interesting side note I forgot to toss out.
Now that I have calmed down a little, I have to say that all this worry that the nodes could grow and pres on nerves or the spine and cause partial paralysis,.... Honestly I've never seen ANY posts on this Board or the ovarian board about that happening to anyone. Have you? I'm not going to let that keep me awake at night! M<aybe he just wants me to see the worst case scenario so that I do SOMETHING (surgery or chemo or radiation). & of course, I will. I just don't know which yet. I'm okay. I wanted 'eyes wide open'; but sometimes the 1st glimpse is pretty awful! HA!0 -
linda, tell your doctor to calm down!lindaprocopio said:Another tidbit I forgot that the oncology nurse said.
Because my gyne-ons is also the head of Women's Health & a very big shot at the hospital, he first has an oncology nurse or P.A. come in and talk through everything with the patient. Because I was getting my PET scan last week, we skipped chemo, and we are skipping chemo until after my 2nd opinion on the surgery. I told the 'assistant' that I was concerned to be NOT getting chemo these past couple of weeks and perhaps a couple more weeks until I get to Fox Chase, because the lymph node under my arm was growing and lit up on the PET scan an incredible 17 (& I know anything lighting up brighter than 3.5 SUV is considered probably malignant). She said a very high uptake like that meant that the cancer there is dividing very rapidly & that's why it sucks up the glucose solution given for the PET, because it needs the sugar to support the rapid celll division. But what was interesting is that she said "That's probably why they all want you to do chemo instead of surgery: WHEN CELLS ARE DIVIDING VERY RAPIDLY, CHEMO WORKS AT ITS BEST." And I can see the sense of that, as some chemos kill just as the cells divide, and other chemos interrupt the cell division process, etc. Anyhow, I take this to mean if you have a high SUV # on your PET, chemo may be a really effective option. Just an interesting side note I forgot to toss out.
Now that I have calmed down a little, I have to say that all this worry that the nodes could grow and pres on nerves or the spine and cause partial paralysis,.... Honestly I've never seen ANY posts on this Board or the ovarian board about that happening to anyone. Have you? I'm not going to let that keep me awake at night! M
it seems to me that your doctor was telling you every possible thing that could ever happen; much like when we sign a release for an anesthetic, and they go over every possible contingency. please, please, DO NOT worry about the pressing on the nerves/partial paralysis, i've never heard of it here either. i frankly do not know why your doctor felt the need to go over all that with you; i honestly think it was to relieve his own anxiety and pass it on to you (in psychology that phenomenon is called projective identification--where one person unloads his anxiety onto another and the other picks it up.) now is definitely the time to give it back to the doctor. i understand the rationale for not doing surgery; though am very interested in what the second opinion has to say. i do wonder about radiation, though don't know much about that. i can also see that possibly a new chemo would do the trick. sure wish we knew what the "right" decision is; but all you can do is amass all the information available, and use your own best judgement. in any case, we are behind you all the way.
hugs and sisterhood,
maggie0 -
Geez Lindalindaprocopio said:Another tidbit I forgot that the oncology nurse said.
Because my gyne-ons is also the head of Women's Health & a very big shot at the hospital, he first has an oncology nurse or P.A. come in and talk through everything with the patient. Because I was getting my PET scan last week, we skipped chemo, and we are skipping chemo until after my 2nd opinion on the surgery. I told the 'assistant' that I was concerned to be NOT getting chemo these past couple of weeks and perhaps a couple more weeks until I get to Fox Chase, because the lymph node under my arm was growing and lit up on the PET scan an incredible 17 (& I know anything lighting up brighter than 3.5 SUV is considered probably malignant). She said a very high uptake like that meant that the cancer there is dividing very rapidly & that's why it sucks up the glucose solution given for the PET, because it needs the sugar to support the rapid celll division. But what was interesting is that she said "That's probably why they all want you to do chemo instead of surgery: WHEN CELLS ARE DIVIDING VERY RAPIDLY, CHEMO WORKS AT ITS BEST." And I can see the sense of that, as some chemos kill just as the cells divide, and other chemos interrupt the cell division process, etc. Anyhow, I take this to mean if you have a high SUV # on your PET, chemo may be a really effective option. Just an interesting side note I forgot to toss out.
Now that I have calmed down a little, I have to say that all this worry that the nodes could grow and pres on nerves or the spine and cause partial paralysis,.... Honestly I've never seen ANY posts on this Board or the ovarian board about that happening to anyone. Have you? I'm not going to let that keep me awake at night! M
That was quite an appointment you had...the good, the bad and the ugly :0
Sending peaceful vibrations your way....hope your appt with Fox Chase comes soon!!!
Hang in and go be one with the Garden!!
Laurie0 -
Linda check this out!!!!!!lindaprocopio said:No appt. yet at Fox Chase, but VERY informative appt locally.
I picked up the CD that my local hospital made of all my 2010 CT/PETs and that needle biopsy to take with me to Fox Chase, but they haven't called me yet with an appointment. I will call them Monday if I don't hear from them today. Meanwhile I had an appointment for my 3-month regular internal with my gyne-onc this morning, and I'm still shaken by our frank conversation. The GOOD NEWS is that all look good from my internal/rectal physical exam. But the rest of the conversation was information (almost TMI!) and disturbing.
We talked about my assumption that if we leave the underarm lymph node in, it may grow larger and start causing me pain, but that by then my platelet and nuetrofils will be too compromised by the chemo for them to safely do surgery. My gyne-onc said that is a possibility of course and that if that node grows uncontrolled it could press on a nerve and possible cause me to lose some use of that arm. (!!!!???!!!) We talked about the extended overall survival of having salvage surgery that would remove all measurable evidence of the cancer, which I had read in a recent study increases the statistical overall survival from 13 months to 30 months. For me that would also involve removing that para-aortic lymph node that keeps lighting up on every other PET scan. He said that my involved para-aortic node is right by an artery (which I assume is what para-aortic means, right???) and very close to my spine and 1 kidney and that this would be extensive dangerous surgery. I knew that, but he went on to say, "but if we can't get that node under control and it keeps growing it could press on your spine and cause some paralysis (!!!???!!!) ; or if it gets into that aorta I don't even want to paint you that scenario." (!!!???!!!) He said that the Geisinger tumor board was advising against the dual surgery for me because I probably would still have microscopic cancer cells elsewhere and still have cancer, and would probably need 5 to 6 weeks to heal from surgery before I was able to get back into chemo. He said that he had recommended radiation of both areas for me, but that my radiation-onc was against that. And he said if Fox Chase recommended surgery for me, and I wanted to go for it, he would advocate for me at Geisinger for them to do the surgery, because my case is so unusual and I am so strong.
I asked about the taxol and why it stopped working for me after 23 rounds total. He said when they prescribe a chemo that attacks through the front door, after time the cancer learns to shut that front door; and then they have to attack through a back door or a window (by trying a new chemo). He said sometimes the cancer learns to shut ALL the doors and windows at once, and no chemo will work, but that we currently have no reason to believe that is true for me. And he said that after several other chemos we may even be able to go BACK to taxol as the cancer will no longer be able to keep the front door shut (t push that analogy).
Seems like a 'damned if you do; damned if you don't scenario. I'm anxious to see what Fox Chase has to say and have no idea whether I want surgery now or what to do. But I am glad to be getting a clear picture of my options. Still, Id never thought about some of the grim things that could happen if chemo or radiation or surgery can't get those lymph nodes under control, and it is scary for sure.
My friend was diagnosed with leukemia and was given nine months to live. Doctors told her that they couldn't do anything for her, she should go home and make her plans. Guess what? that was 16 years ago. So there, they don't know everything. She did natural herbs. You are a fighter and you will be able to get those lymph nodes control. Let's wait and see what Fox Chase's plans are. You are in good hands and this too shall pass. Love and good health to you. June0 -
you received an overwhelming ‘false no hope'lindaprocopio said:Another tidbit I forgot that the oncology nurse said.
Because my gyne-ons is also the head of Women's Health & a very big shot at the hospital, he first has an oncology nurse or P.A. come in and talk through everything with the patient. Because I was getting my PET scan last week, we skipped chemo, and we are skipping chemo until after my 2nd opinion on the surgery. I told the 'assistant' that I was concerned to be NOT getting chemo these past couple of weeks and perhaps a couple more weeks until I get to Fox Chase, because the lymph node under my arm was growing and lit up on the PET scan an incredible 17 (& I know anything lighting up brighter than 3.5 SUV is considered probably malignant). She said a very high uptake like that meant that the cancer there is dividing very rapidly & that's why it sucks up the glucose solution given for the PET, because it needs the sugar to support the rapid celll division. But what was interesting is that she said "That's probably why they all want you to do chemo instead of surgery: WHEN CELLS ARE DIVIDING VERY RAPIDLY, CHEMO WORKS AT ITS BEST." And I can see the sense of that, as some chemos kill just as the cells divide, and other chemos interrupt the cell division process, etc. Anyhow, I take this to mean if you have a high SUV # on your PET, chemo may be a really effective option. Just an interesting side note I forgot to toss out.
Now that I have calmed down a little, I have to say that all this worry that the nodes could grow and pres on nerves or the spine and cause partial paralysis,.... Honestly I've never seen ANY posts on this Board or the ovarian board about that happening to anyone. Have you? I'm not going to let that keep me awake at night! M
There is a famous physician and author named Bernie Segal who has a remarkable quote about faith and hope; he says, “It is better to give false hope than it is to give false ‘no hope.’” It sounds to me that you received an overwhelming dose of what very well may be ‘false no hope'.
"Positive thought creates an environment that is conducive for healing. In modern lingo it is called the psychosomatic relationship." Focus on that relationship between your mind and your body and plug in positive-hopeful messages.
Maybe you would like to read some of his books:
http://www.berniesiegelmd.com/bernie_siegel.htm0 -
Goodness graciouslindaprocopio said:Another tidbit I forgot that the oncology nurse said.
Because my gyne-ons is also the head of Women's Health & a very big shot at the hospital, he first has an oncology nurse or P.A. come in and talk through everything with the patient. Because I was getting my PET scan last week, we skipped chemo, and we are skipping chemo until after my 2nd opinion on the surgery. I told the 'assistant' that I was concerned to be NOT getting chemo these past couple of weeks and perhaps a couple more weeks until I get to Fox Chase, because the lymph node under my arm was growing and lit up on the PET scan an incredible 17 (& I know anything lighting up brighter than 3.5 SUV is considered probably malignant). She said a very high uptake like that meant that the cancer there is dividing very rapidly & that's why it sucks up the glucose solution given for the PET, because it needs the sugar to support the rapid celll division. But what was interesting is that she said "That's probably why they all want you to do chemo instead of surgery: WHEN CELLS ARE DIVIDING VERY RAPIDLY, CHEMO WORKS AT ITS BEST." And I can see the sense of that, as some chemos kill just as the cells divide, and other chemos interrupt the cell division process, etc. Anyhow, I take this to mean if you have a high SUV # on your PET, chemo may be a really effective option. Just an interesting side note I forgot to toss out.
Now that I have calmed down a little, I have to say that all this worry that the nodes could grow and pres on nerves or the spine and cause partial paralysis,.... Honestly I've never seen ANY posts on this Board or the ovarian board about that happening to anyone. Have you? I'm not going to let that keep me awake at night! M
I'm so sorry you're dealing with all this. And that you got so bombarded by your doctor. Hopefully you will get an appt. at Fox Chase soon.
You're in my thoughts and prayers.0 -
Too much info??maggie_wilson said:linda, tell your doctor to calm down!
it seems to me that your doctor was telling you every possible thing that could ever happen; much like when we sign a release for an anesthetic, and they go over every possible contingency. please, please, DO NOT worry about the pressing on the nerves/partial paralysis, i've never heard of it here either. i frankly do not know why your doctor felt the need to go over all that with you; i honestly think it was to relieve his own anxiety and pass it on to you (in psychology that phenomenon is called projective identification--where one person unloads his anxiety onto another and the other picks it up.) now is definitely the time to give it back to the doctor. i understand the rationale for not doing surgery; though am very interested in what the second opinion has to say. i do wonder about radiation, though don't know much about that. i can also see that possibly a new chemo would do the trick. sure wish we knew what the "right" decision is; but all you can do is amass all the information available, and use your own best judgement. in any case, we are behind you all the way.
hugs and sisterhood,
maggie
I agree with Maggie and Bea-mil....am thinking the Dr. overloaded you! It is not unlike some of those inserts with medications....They list every POSSIBLE (although many times remote) possible side effects. We can all get run over by a car tomorrow, have a heart attack or whatever. I am thinking too that he passed some of his anxiety on!
You are a sharp person....wade through the info, and discard that which seems "far-fetched". You will make the right decision!!
Hugs...Karen0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.9K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 794 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 63 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 540 Sarcoma
- 734 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards