Cheap drug shields kidneys from CT dye damage: study
I think it is worth to read since we are doing so many ct scans.
"The use of contrast agents has brought enormous medical benefits, especially in angioplastic surgery, but has also heralded a steep rise in kidney failure, by far the most common and serious side effect of powerful scanners. As many as one in ten healthy people undergoing CT scans suffer acute kidney failure — an increase of at least 50% in blood creatinine — typically peaking two to five days after exposure."
"Patients with impaired renal function should not accept a CT scan unless they are first given a pill to protect their kidneys, say researchers writing in the February 19 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Even patients with healthy kidneys could benefit from taking the nephroprotective drug N-acetylcysteine, also known as NAC or acetylcysteine, before undergoing scans involving iodine-based radio-contrast agents, the study finds. N-acetylcysteine is cheap, safe, widely available, and could prevent serious kidney damage often caused by iodine."
If you would like to read more go to: http://www.nationalreviewofmedicine.com/issue/2008/03/5_patients_practice05_3.html
Comments
-
Very Interesting
Bea....a very interesting article. My GYN/ONC don't order "routine" CT scans after the one I had 3 months after completing treatment....UNLESS there are symptoms and/or physical findings.... but if I come to a point when I need one again, I will definitely keep this in mind....especially since I only have one kidney! I didn't realize the risk or that there was something that could be done to reduce the risk!
Thanks!!
Karen0 -
Interesting reading~kkstef said:Very Interesting
Bea....a very interesting article. My GYN/ONC don't order "routine" CT scans after the one I had 3 months after completing treatment....UNLESS there are symptoms and/or physical findings.... but if I come to a point when I need one again, I will definitely keep this in mind....especially since I only have one kidney! I didn't realize the risk or that there was something that could be done to reduce the risk!
Thanks!!
Karen
Good information as I approached my oncologist after my first 2 CT's. Heard so much about the high levels of radiation. He was very receptive as knows I'd do anything alternative and then add on more radiation.... We've agreed to only do scan every 6 months vs. every 3 months. Now as time goes, possibly following Karen's setup -- only do scan if have symptoms and/or physical findings.
Quite interesting to read of how these tests affect our kidneys...never crossed my mind. Boy now I'm on it like glue.
Thanks again!
Jan0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.9K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 794 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 63 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 540 Sarcoma
- 734 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards