surgery after radiation anybody else?
Comments
-
surgery after radiation
I have never before heard that 'recovery time' had anything to do with why surgery after radiation would be ill-advised. We must hope that dad's doctors are sufficiently expert that they would consider the effects of his other treatments when scheduling the surgery.
In my own case, I was encouraged to have surgery before radiation for head/neck cancer (lung cancer came later) because the rads would make the tissue in the area to be operated on much more difficult to deal with.
That might apply, but in a lesser sense, in dad's case, since the area being considered is probably a larger mass (a lobe or a lung?).
I would say, personally, that any time they are interested in doing surgery this is a good thing. Optimally, of course, there is no cancer, but once we are certain there is cancer, particularly in the lung or another organ, I would think that we would be ecstatic when they suggest surgery.
There are so many folks on this board (and others) who WOULD BE ecstatic if their doctors offered surgery.
All of which is to say that dad should be very happy that the chemo and rads have had such a dramatically positive effect on his cancer that they are NOW considering a surgical measure in an attempt to eliminate the junk altogether!
Welcome to CSN, by the way: a crummy club due to 'membership requirements', but a joint comprised of a wonderful membership of kind, giving people with a myriad experiences to share, which they often do.
Take care,
Joe0 -
rad then surgerysoccerfreaks said:surgery after radiation
I have never before heard that 'recovery time' had anything to do with why surgery after radiation would be ill-advised. We must hope that dad's doctors are sufficiently expert that they would consider the effects of his other treatments when scheduling the surgery.
In my own case, I was encouraged to have surgery before radiation for head/neck cancer (lung cancer came later) because the rads would make the tissue in the area to be operated on much more difficult to deal with.
That might apply, but in a lesser sense, in dad's case, since the area being considered is probably a larger mass (a lobe or a lung?).
I would say, personally, that any time they are interested in doing surgery this is a good thing. Optimally, of course, there is no cancer, but once we are certain there is cancer, particularly in the lung or another organ, I would think that we would be ecstatic when they suggest surgery.
There are so many folks on this board (and others) who WOULD BE ecstatic if their doctors offered surgery.
All of which is to say that dad should be very happy that the chemo and rads have had such a dramatically positive effect on his cancer that they are NOW considering a surgical measure in an attempt to eliminate the junk altogether!
Welcome to CSN, by the way: a crummy club due to 'membership requirements', but a joint comprised of a wonderful membership of kind, giving people with a myriad experiences to share, which they often do.
Take care,
Joe
I went for a 2nd opinion and my surgeon said if i contuned my radiation he could not do surgery because it makes the lungs hard to work on0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards