CT scan
iluvmms
Member Posts: 134 Member
Hi everyone!
I had a scan on thursday. I had a met to liver that was large. It appears to have shrunk some to 4.5 cm x 5.5 cm and is less prominate?? Not sure waht that means for sure or how much it needs to shrink before surgery resection. That is the goal of my surgeon. It previous measured 5.7 x 6.9, and the scans were a 2 months apart. I have 2 more treatments still. Does anyone know the goal of the size before they can do a resection??
I had a scan on thursday. I had a met to liver that was large. It appears to have shrunk some to 4.5 cm x 5.5 cm and is less prominate?? Not sure waht that means for sure or how much it needs to shrink before surgery resection. That is the goal of my surgeon. It previous measured 5.7 x 6.9, and the scans were a 2 months apart. I have 2 more treatments still. Does anyone know the goal of the size before they can do a resection??
0
Comments
-
maybe has to do with location?
Hi,
I don't know about if there is a "good" size to get down to before having a resection. I would imagine though that it might also have to do with the location of the tumor and its accessibility. If a tumor is too close to a major blood vessel, etc., it could be problematic to do a resection on it. Maybe if that's the case, they're trying to shrink it down and away from a blood vessel. I actually had a major blood vessel cut out and permanently clamped off during my liver resection. When I had my resection, I had three tumors left that were visible on the CT (although they discovered three more during surgery that had never shown up on any CT- weird, but apparently not uncommon according to my surgeon). My largest was 3.5 cm. It started at 4.5 cm, but I don't remember the surgeon ever talking about a desired size for surgery.
Remember, you should also seek out a 2nd opinion on this, if you haven't already done so.
Best wishes-
Lisa0 -
Everyone is different
I think like Lisa said, it could be more of a location issue than size. In my case, I had a larger tumor on my hepatic artery so they could not operate until they shrunk it. After 6 months it was down to a size where they felt they could take it out with safe margins and not risk cutting in to the artery. I've often asked my Oncologist how big/small the tumors are. She really doesn't put too much emphasis on that. We are either shrinking or keeping the tumors that I have stable. That is all I need to know.
Why don't you ask your Oncologist/surgeon what the goal or target is?
They could give you more reliable info that we can but I don't mind telling you my story.
Keep shrinking 'em!
-phil0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 396 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.3K Kidney Cancer
- 670 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 537 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 652 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards