CT Scan Results - Hopeful News
Well, the good news is that after 3 months of chemo, my right hilar nodes have reduced in size from 1.3 x 1.2 cm to 8 x 8 mm and my subcarinal lymph nodes have "slightly improved". The 3 mm nodular density now appears more faint and "fuzzy", although somewhat larger at 5mm. I requested that my radiation oncologist look at the scan and he said that yes, it is most likely radiation necrosis due to the one stereotatic radiation treatment that I had before I got my second opinion. A physician friend has been measuring the subcutaneous mass on my back and it has reduced in size from 2 x 1.5 cm to 9 x 7 mm. The radiologist reading the scans however, said that there was "no change" in the subcutaneous lesion. Both my oncologist and I know differently. When I asked my oncologist to clarify this discrepancy with the radiologist, he said that we know that the tumor has reduced in size and left it at that. I'm not sure if I'm going to pursue it or not. At this point, I'm going to focus on the big picture - the chemo is working!
Since I had all of the differing opinions going into chemo, I now feel much more hopeful that this chemo will take me even closer to NED.
I hope that my experience will help others with lung mets that are trying to make those difficult decisions.
Take good care,
Susan
Comments
-
Hi, Susan
SO glad you
Hi, Susan
SO glad you discontinued the radiation to your lungs - that's scary stuff.
They wanted to do that to me and I told them N-O. I had radiation on the lower half of my body and knew the collateral damage that I suffered there, so I told them we're not going to do radiation to my lung - I worried about the radiation hitting near the heart and frying those arteries out and causing mitral valve leaks and such, plus the scar tissue build up, I just said no thank you - and then I got a 2nd opinion.
I talk to a thorasic surgeon next week to go over VATS or a thoractomy to get 2 spots off the pleura of my lung...they think that it is operable.
Your case certainly sounds promising, and am so glad to hear that there is no radiation in your future...that made me feel good...best of luck and I would like to hear from you on how things go for you.
Take care
-Craig0 -
Thank you CraigSundanceh said:Hi, Susan
SO glad you
Hi, Susan
SO glad you discontinued the radiation to your lungs - that's scary stuff.
They wanted to do that to me and I told them N-O. I had radiation on the lower half of my body and knew the collateral damage that I suffered there, so I told them we're not going to do radiation to my lung - I worried about the radiation hitting near the heart and frying those arteries out and causing mitral valve leaks and such, plus the scar tissue build up, I just said no thank you - and then I got a 2nd opinion.
I talk to a thorasic surgeon next week to go over VATS or a thoractomy to get 2 spots off the pleura of my lung...they think that it is operable.
Your case certainly sounds promising, and am so glad to hear that there is no radiation in your future...that made me feel good...best of luck and I would like to hear from you on how things go for you.
Take care
-Craig
Craig,
Thank you for your words of encouragement. I agree with you about radiation. I've had two rounds of it to my rectal area when I was stage III and it is scarey stuff.
Hopefully, another 6 treatments of Folfiri and Avastin will take care of the hilar lymph node and the subcarinal lymph node for good. I'm having a harder time with each treatment. I hate putting these chemicals in my body. I have changed my diet considerably and plan to start juicing. I just don't have the taste for it when I'm on chemo.
Good luck with your decision about VATS vs a thoracotomy.
Best to you,
Susan0 -
Susancalifsue said:Thank you Craig
Craig,
Thank you for your words of encouragement. I agree with you about radiation. I've had two rounds of it to my rectal area when I was stage III and it is scarey stuff.
Hopefully, another 6 treatments of Folfiri and Avastin will take care of the hilar lymph node and the subcarinal lymph node for good. I'm having a harder time with each treatment. I hate putting these chemicals in my body. I have changed my diet considerably and plan to start juicing. I just don't have the taste for it when I'm on chemo.
Good luck with your decision about VATS vs a thoracotomy.
Best to you,
Susan
I don`t know why they told you that the chemo wouldn`t work on your liver mets. I had 4 liver mets and my 3 month scan showed that my liver mets were gone and that was from straight chemo. I still have some residual stuff going on but no tumors. Who knows what will happen in the long term but it is working for now. I hope you situation continues to get better and you have many more years of health and well being.
Eric ( : . )0 -
Hey Susan!eric38 said:Susan
I don`t know why they told you that the chemo wouldn`t work on your liver mets. I had 4 liver mets and my 3 month scan showed that my liver mets were gone and that was from straight chemo. I still have some residual stuff going on but no tumors. Who knows what will happen in the long term but it is working for now. I hope you situation continues to get better and you have many more years of health and well being.
Eric ( : . )
Eric is right, I have chemo also that has been shrinking my liver mets as well, I don't know why they would say that to you either! I think I'd be looking for another opinion!
Hugsss!
~Donna0 -
lung not liverShayenne said:Hey Susan!
Eric is right, I have chemo also that has been shrinking my liver mets as well, I don't know why they would say that to you either! I think I'd be looking for another opinion!
Hugsss!
~Donna
It was lung mets that were to be irradiated, not liver mets.
It's great that the chemo is working. My take on the radiation is that the best thing about not doing it now is that you might have it in reserve for later, in case chemo is not sufficient. Whether or not you buy this, you might mention to your radiation oncologist the possibility of further radiation treatments in the future, if for no other reason, to stay on his good side.
--Greg0 -
My Bust!PGLGreg said:lung not liver
It was lung mets that were to be irradiated, not liver mets.
It's great that the chemo is working. My take on the radiation is that the best thing about not doing it now is that you might have it in reserve for later, in case chemo is not sufficient. Whether or not you buy this, you might mention to your radiation oncologist the possibility of further radiation treatments in the future, if for no other reason, to stay on his good side.
--Greg
Should have read that more carefully, sorry for the confusion!
Hugsss!
~Donna0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 122K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 673 Leukemia
- 794 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 238 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.2K Ovarian Cancer
- 63 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 543 Sarcoma
- 736 Skin Cancer
- 657 Stomach Cancer
- 192 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.9K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards