Radiaion will not get it all

CanadaSue
CanadaSue Member Posts: 339 Member
edited March 2014 in Colorectal Cancer #1
Hi all,

I have had some to settle down from my last post......

We saw the radiologist last week, he said that Bill has a 2-3 inch tumor near his tailbone.
this has just shown up since hs last surgery in March 2008. Since he has had 3 major surgeries in 2 years, they say that further surgery is not a option. They want to try radiation now, but the doctor told us it will not get all of it. We have another appoinment set up for Fiday where they will do another CT scan and map out where they will be pointing the radiation.

This doctor also said he is not sure how many treatments they will do. I have heard everyone talk about the 5.5, but we were told they could either do 10 treatments or go for the 5.5, but if they do the 5.5 that he would never be able to have radiation again. I am not comfortable with this doctor, but knowing that Bill's oncologist also has a say in all this makes me feel a little better.

Has anyone heard of them opting for one of these treatments? I want to call our regular onocologist, but I know that she doesn't get involved in the radation department.

Any suggestions or comments are greatly appreciated.

Hugs,

Sue

Comments

  • Buzzard
    Buzzard Member Posts: 3,043 Member
    Two Words
    Second Opinion......Its your choice in the route you take for your care , get another opinion, it will not hurt a thing, then if its different then get another, until you are ok with where your next step needs to be...Good Luck and God Bless you both.......
  • Monicaemilia
    Monicaemilia Member Posts: 455 Member
    I would also opt for a second opinion....
    I'm not sure I understand why surgery is not an option. As for radiation, I had 10 treatments done for my bone mets, and I was told that if needed they could do one more treatment. Definitely get a second opinion. Monica
  • KathiM
    KathiM Member Posts: 8,028 Member
    I agree,
    Second opinion. Since, as you mentioned, this decision (5.5) comes with consequences. Not that it's the wrong one, just you need to get more than one specialist to get on board.

    I know, dearheart, all this makes you weary...but it IS necessary. I went to 5(!) second opinions on my breast cancer treatments that followed my rectal cancer. The last 3 I had to self-pay. I finally got my answer, and felt good about it.

    Hugs, Kathi
  • CanadaSue
    CanadaSue Member Posts: 339 Member
    Buzzard said:

    Two Words
    Second Opinion......Its your choice in the route you take for your care , get another opinion, it will not hurt a thing, then if its different then get another, until you are ok with where your next step needs to be...Good Luck and God Bless you both.......

    Thanks, that sounds like
    Thanks, that sounds like good advise!

    Hugs,

    Sue
  • CanadaSue
    CanadaSue Member Posts: 339 Member

    I would also opt for a second opinion....
    I'm not sure I understand why surgery is not an option. As for radiation, I had 10 treatments done for my bone mets, and I was told that if needed they could do one more treatment. Definitely get a second opinion. Monica

    Surgery
    Bill has had 3 major surgeries in 2 years, they have removed everything, except his stomach, kidneys and liver. But I will put a call into the oncologist to find out why. ANd ask a few more questions of her as well.


    Thanks

    Hugs,

    Sue
  • CanadaSue
    CanadaSue Member Posts: 339 Member
    KathiM said:

    I agree,
    Second opinion. Since, as you mentioned, this decision (5.5) comes with consequences. Not that it's the wrong one, just you need to get more than one specialist to get on board.

    I know, dearheart, all this makes you weary...but it IS necessary. I went to 5(!) second opinions on my breast cancer treatments that followed my rectal cancer. The last 3 I had to self-pay. I finally got my answer, and felt good about it.

    Hugs, Kathi

    Thanks Kathie
    Kathie,

    Here in Canada or at least at the Cross Canacer Center in Alberta - it is a group of doctors who make the decisions not just one doctor. They have round table chats on all patients, our doctor told us that Bill is much discussed around that table because of the reoccurences, and everything he has faced so far. The doctor has also been very open with us about everything, but I just do not feel comfortable with the radiologist. I think I will get in touch with the oncologist or her nurse to ask somemore questions.

    As always your replies to my posts are greatly appreciated!

    Hugs,

    Sue
  • Kanort
    Kanort Member Posts: 1,272 Member
    Support!
    Dear Sue,

    I am so sorry for Bill's latest struggles. Please know that you both are in my heart and prayers. I hate you are not comfortable with the radiation doctor. I hope that your visit tomorrow goes well, and you get more questions answered. Sending you and Bill my best.

    Hugs,

    Kay
  • CherylHutch
    CherylHutch Member Posts: 1,375 Member
    CanadaSue said:

    Thanks Kathie
    Kathie,

    Here in Canada or at least at the Cross Canacer Center in Alberta - it is a group of doctors who make the decisions not just one doctor. They have round table chats on all patients, our doctor told us that Bill is much discussed around that table because of the reoccurences, and everything he has faced so far. The doctor has also been very open with us about everything, but I just do not feel comfortable with the radiologist. I think I will get in touch with the oncologist or her nurse to ask somemore questions.

    As always your replies to my posts are greatly appreciated!

    Hugs,

    Sue

    Opinions
    Sue,

    I wasn't sure if it was the same protocol in Alberta as it is in BC or not. But it sounds like it's very similar. My oncologist is my "primary" oncologist which means she will be with me through this whole journey and basically, she's my advocate, as well as my oncologist/chemotherapist. But, like your Center in Alberta, the BC Cancer Agency has "Case Conferences" where any oncologist can take their case(s) to a case conference which consists of other oncologists, radiologists, surgeons, and specialists and they all get copies of the case ahead of time, then they discuss the case and come up with the what they think is the best recommendations for a particular patient.

    For example, when I had gone for a needle biopsy of the adrenal gland and we were waiting for the results, my oncologist had said that if it proved to be positive for cancer, she wasn't sure what our plan would be since it would mean the colon cancer had spread and if it's gone to the adrenal gland (which didn't make sense) then it's quite possible that it has spread to many other areas (we already knew it had spread to the lungs)... but this is not something we can decide now on a "What if..." basis because we'd really have to know what all we were looking at. Of course, I freaked out because to me that meant if it had spread, then I was going to die. That's all I could think of. It was the longest week in my life waiting to hear the results.

    When the day came that I had an appt. to go over the results with her, I brought two friends with me. When Sharlene told me that the test came back positive, I went into shock and I think I momentarily left my body. I no longer was aware that my friends were in the room and I could hear Sharlene but I couldn't see her. She held my hands tightly and kept saying, "Cheryl, come back.. come back... we have a plan. I have to discuss this plan with you."

    So somewhere in the back of my mind, the word "plan" sunk in, so I came back to awareness and whispered, "A plan?"

    Yes, when the biopsy came back positive, she took my case to the Case Conference. They went over all the scans, the biopsy results, then the things to do with age, healthy, etc. Sharlene was my advocate and the group of them came up with the recommendation to go in and surgically remove the adrenal gland and then a surgery to surgically remove the 14mm tumour on the lung (at that time the tiny nodules weren't as much as a concern).

    So, I've had the adrenal surgery and now we are dealing with the lung stuff. Since the tumour is still small and growing agonizingly slow, we have time now to come up with a plan for the small nodules which we aren't sure which ones are cancer, if any of them are. Hence, Sharlene is wanting a third opinion from this radiologist at a different hospital regarding ablating the small ones before doing the lung surgery on the larger one.

    I am really happy with how they do this. I'm hearing with our American friends here, that it appears to get second or third opinions, either you have to find other specialists yourself... and then there's the whole procedure of having your insurance company approve this request. All of this does take time and it's not like every patient is physically in condition to be able to do all this running around and paperwork.

    It sounds like the difference here is the primary oncologist here in Canada IS the patient's advocate as well as their oncologist/chemotherapist. So all the running around that would be done by the patient or caregiver, looking for second and third opinions is done by the patient's primary oncologist. As for insurance, I feel so much for our southern friends as I read the stories of the hassles some of you are experiencing... waiting for approvals, whether you can use the doctors you want to, etc. and then the worry when some of you know your insurance is running out.

    I know a lot of my American friends have assumed that Canada has "socialized" health care, which is not true. There's a big difference between "socialized" health care and "subsidized" health care. We have subsidized, meaning the government does give each province a big whack of money to manage their provincial health care plans and each province has to throw in a whack of money, but each province manages their own insurance plan. As a citizen, every Canadian citizen is entitled to subsidized/affordable insurance. Most employers pay for the monthly premiums as an employee benefit, but for those who are self-employed and have to pay their own, the monthly premiums are $54/single person, $96/family of 2 and $108/family of 3 or more for any net income of over $28,000. If your net income is under $28,000, then the monthly premiums are less on a sliding scale... where very low incomers insurance premiums are covered.

    That could be why there is this misunderstanding that Canada has socialized medicine because the "government" is involved... but their involvement has to do with money and subsidizing the provinces. The actual care... as a patient, you can go to any doctor/specialist you want... there are no lists of "approved for insurance" doctors. If you aren't comfortable with a doctor/specialist that you are seeing, you can change doctors and the new doctor will request your records from the previous doctor. You do not have to notify the insurance company that you've changed doctors... that's all done when the doctors do their billing (you don't need to fill out a kajillion forms)... although, you may have to sign a form here and there that you are aware of a procedure a doctor is billing for.

    So, as far as second and third opinions go... 9 out of 10 times that is standard routine, but as a patient, if you feel you want an opinion from a different doctor that you pick... then you can do that as well.

    So, Sue... I think you and your hubby are probably on the right track and he is getting good care. But if you are feeling at all uneasy, by all means, check with his oncologist and you can make some other enquiries if you feel like that would ease your mind.

    Huggggggs,

    Cheryl
  • msccolon
    msccolon Member Posts: 1,917 Member

    Opinions
    Sue,

    I wasn't sure if it was the same protocol in Alberta as it is in BC or not. But it sounds like it's very similar. My oncologist is my "primary" oncologist which means she will be with me through this whole journey and basically, she's my advocate, as well as my oncologist/chemotherapist. But, like your Center in Alberta, the BC Cancer Agency has "Case Conferences" where any oncologist can take their case(s) to a case conference which consists of other oncologists, radiologists, surgeons, and specialists and they all get copies of the case ahead of time, then they discuss the case and come up with the what they think is the best recommendations for a particular patient.

    For example, when I had gone for a needle biopsy of the adrenal gland and we were waiting for the results, my oncologist had said that if it proved to be positive for cancer, she wasn't sure what our plan would be since it would mean the colon cancer had spread and if it's gone to the adrenal gland (which didn't make sense) then it's quite possible that it has spread to many other areas (we already knew it had spread to the lungs)... but this is not something we can decide now on a "What if..." basis because we'd really have to know what all we were looking at. Of course, I freaked out because to me that meant if it had spread, then I was going to die. That's all I could think of. It was the longest week in my life waiting to hear the results.

    When the day came that I had an appt. to go over the results with her, I brought two friends with me. When Sharlene told me that the test came back positive, I went into shock and I think I momentarily left my body. I no longer was aware that my friends were in the room and I could hear Sharlene but I couldn't see her. She held my hands tightly and kept saying, "Cheryl, come back.. come back... we have a plan. I have to discuss this plan with you."

    So somewhere in the back of my mind, the word "plan" sunk in, so I came back to awareness and whispered, "A plan?"

    Yes, when the biopsy came back positive, she took my case to the Case Conference. They went over all the scans, the biopsy results, then the things to do with age, healthy, etc. Sharlene was my advocate and the group of them came up with the recommendation to go in and surgically remove the adrenal gland and then a surgery to surgically remove the 14mm tumour on the lung (at that time the tiny nodules weren't as much as a concern).

    So, I've had the adrenal surgery and now we are dealing with the lung stuff. Since the tumour is still small and growing agonizingly slow, we have time now to come up with a plan for the small nodules which we aren't sure which ones are cancer, if any of them are. Hence, Sharlene is wanting a third opinion from this radiologist at a different hospital regarding ablating the small ones before doing the lung surgery on the larger one.

    I am really happy with how they do this. I'm hearing with our American friends here, that it appears to get second or third opinions, either you have to find other specialists yourself... and then there's the whole procedure of having your insurance company approve this request. All of this does take time and it's not like every patient is physically in condition to be able to do all this running around and paperwork.

    It sounds like the difference here is the primary oncologist here in Canada IS the patient's advocate as well as their oncologist/chemotherapist. So all the running around that would be done by the patient or caregiver, looking for second and third opinions is done by the patient's primary oncologist. As for insurance, I feel so much for our southern friends as I read the stories of the hassles some of you are experiencing... waiting for approvals, whether you can use the doctors you want to, etc. and then the worry when some of you know your insurance is running out.

    I know a lot of my American friends have assumed that Canada has "socialized" health care, which is not true. There's a big difference between "socialized" health care and "subsidized" health care. We have subsidized, meaning the government does give each province a big whack of money to manage their provincial health care plans and each province has to throw in a whack of money, but each province manages their own insurance plan. As a citizen, every Canadian citizen is entitled to subsidized/affordable insurance. Most employers pay for the monthly premiums as an employee benefit, but for those who are self-employed and have to pay their own, the monthly premiums are $54/single person, $96/family of 2 and $108/family of 3 or more for any net income of over $28,000. If your net income is under $28,000, then the monthly premiums are less on a sliding scale... where very low incomers insurance premiums are covered.

    That could be why there is this misunderstanding that Canada has socialized medicine because the "government" is involved... but their involvement has to do with money and subsidizing the provinces. The actual care... as a patient, you can go to any doctor/specialist you want... there are no lists of "approved for insurance" doctors. If you aren't comfortable with a doctor/specialist that you are seeing, you can change doctors and the new doctor will request your records from the previous doctor. You do not have to notify the insurance company that you've changed doctors... that's all done when the doctors do their billing (you don't need to fill out a kajillion forms)... although, you may have to sign a form here and there that you are aware of a procedure a doctor is billing for.

    So, as far as second and third opinions go... 9 out of 10 times that is standard routine, but as a patient, if you feel you want an opinion from a different doctor that you pick... then you can do that as well.

    So, Sue... I think you and your hubby are probably on the right track and he is getting good care. But if you are feeling at all uneasy, by all means, check with his oncologist and you can make some other enquiries if you feel like that would ease your mind.

    Huggggggs,

    Cheryl

    Case conferences
    They call those tumor boards here in the states! Well, I am sure they have a fancier term for it officially, but we all refer to them as tumor boards and I know I have been brought up numerous times because not only did my onc tell me they were discussing me when I was first diagnosed, when i met the new onc in the office the other day he could have sworn we had met; the name looked familiar to him :). It's nice to be appreciated!
    Mary
  • CanadaSue
    CanadaSue Member Posts: 339 Member

    Opinions
    Sue,

    I wasn't sure if it was the same protocol in Alberta as it is in BC or not. But it sounds like it's very similar. My oncologist is my "primary" oncologist which means she will be with me through this whole journey and basically, she's my advocate, as well as my oncologist/chemotherapist. But, like your Center in Alberta, the BC Cancer Agency has "Case Conferences" where any oncologist can take their case(s) to a case conference which consists of other oncologists, radiologists, surgeons, and specialists and they all get copies of the case ahead of time, then they discuss the case and come up with the what they think is the best recommendations for a particular patient.

    For example, when I had gone for a needle biopsy of the adrenal gland and we were waiting for the results, my oncologist had said that if it proved to be positive for cancer, she wasn't sure what our plan would be since it would mean the colon cancer had spread and if it's gone to the adrenal gland (which didn't make sense) then it's quite possible that it has spread to many other areas (we already knew it had spread to the lungs)... but this is not something we can decide now on a "What if..." basis because we'd really have to know what all we were looking at. Of course, I freaked out because to me that meant if it had spread, then I was going to die. That's all I could think of. It was the longest week in my life waiting to hear the results.

    When the day came that I had an appt. to go over the results with her, I brought two friends with me. When Sharlene told me that the test came back positive, I went into shock and I think I momentarily left my body. I no longer was aware that my friends were in the room and I could hear Sharlene but I couldn't see her. She held my hands tightly and kept saying, "Cheryl, come back.. come back... we have a plan. I have to discuss this plan with you."

    So somewhere in the back of my mind, the word "plan" sunk in, so I came back to awareness and whispered, "A plan?"

    Yes, when the biopsy came back positive, she took my case to the Case Conference. They went over all the scans, the biopsy results, then the things to do with age, healthy, etc. Sharlene was my advocate and the group of them came up with the recommendation to go in and surgically remove the adrenal gland and then a surgery to surgically remove the 14mm tumour on the lung (at that time the tiny nodules weren't as much as a concern).

    So, I've had the adrenal surgery and now we are dealing with the lung stuff. Since the tumour is still small and growing agonizingly slow, we have time now to come up with a plan for the small nodules which we aren't sure which ones are cancer, if any of them are. Hence, Sharlene is wanting a third opinion from this radiologist at a different hospital regarding ablating the small ones before doing the lung surgery on the larger one.

    I am really happy with how they do this. I'm hearing with our American friends here, that it appears to get second or third opinions, either you have to find other specialists yourself... and then there's the whole procedure of having your insurance company approve this request. All of this does take time and it's not like every patient is physically in condition to be able to do all this running around and paperwork.

    It sounds like the difference here is the primary oncologist here in Canada IS the patient's advocate as well as their oncologist/chemotherapist. So all the running around that would be done by the patient or caregiver, looking for second and third opinions is done by the patient's primary oncologist. As for insurance, I feel so much for our southern friends as I read the stories of the hassles some of you are experiencing... waiting for approvals, whether you can use the doctors you want to, etc. and then the worry when some of you know your insurance is running out.

    I know a lot of my American friends have assumed that Canada has "socialized" health care, which is not true. There's a big difference between "socialized" health care and "subsidized" health care. We have subsidized, meaning the government does give each province a big whack of money to manage their provincial health care plans and each province has to throw in a whack of money, but each province manages their own insurance plan. As a citizen, every Canadian citizen is entitled to subsidized/affordable insurance. Most employers pay for the monthly premiums as an employee benefit, but for those who are self-employed and have to pay their own, the monthly premiums are $54/single person, $96/family of 2 and $108/family of 3 or more for any net income of over $28,000. If your net income is under $28,000, then the monthly premiums are less on a sliding scale... where very low incomers insurance premiums are covered.

    That could be why there is this misunderstanding that Canada has socialized medicine because the "government" is involved... but their involvement has to do with money and subsidizing the provinces. The actual care... as a patient, you can go to any doctor/specialist you want... there are no lists of "approved for insurance" doctors. If you aren't comfortable with a doctor/specialist that you are seeing, you can change doctors and the new doctor will request your records from the previous doctor. You do not have to notify the insurance company that you've changed doctors... that's all done when the doctors do their billing (you don't need to fill out a kajillion forms)... although, you may have to sign a form here and there that you are aware of a procedure a doctor is billing for.

    So, as far as second and third opinions go... 9 out of 10 times that is standard routine, but as a patient, if you feel you want an opinion from a different doctor that you pick... then you can do that as well.

    So, Sue... I think you and your hubby are probably on the right track and he is getting good care. But if you are feeling at all uneasy, by all means, check with his oncologist and you can make some other enquiries if you feel like that would ease your mind.

    Huggggggs,

    Cheryl

    It's the same
    Cheryl,

    I guess it would be the same across Canada, come Jan 1/09 Albertans will no longer have to pay health care premiums, the government will be taking it over, both Bill and I have coverage for prescriptions and dental thru work. I am so glad that, we do not have to fight for our health care. I could not imagine going thru this journey and having to fight insurance companies at the same time. I really feel for you all south of the border in that respect.

    I have a call in to Bill's oncologist, so hopfully I will hear from her tomorrow morning.
    Glad to hear your Celebrattion was a sucess, you rock girl!

    Hugs,

    Sue
  • CanadaSue
    CanadaSue Member Posts: 339 Member
    Kanort said:

    Support!
    Dear Sue,

    I am so sorry for Bill's latest struggles. Please know that you both are in my heart and prayers. I hate you are not comfortable with the radiation doctor. I hope that your visit tomorrow goes well, and you get more questions answered. Sending you and Bill my best.

    Hugs,

    Kay

    To an angel
    Kay,

    Thank you for your words of comfort, they really mean a lot.

    I have been more of a lurker on this sight, but I am quickly learning that if you don't ask the questions you are not going to get answers either.

    You are such an inspiration to us all!

    Hugs,

    Sue
  • standbyme
    standbyme Member Posts: 41
    CanadaSue said:

    It's the same
    Cheryl,

    I guess it would be the same across Canada, come Jan 1/09 Albertans will no longer have to pay health care premiums, the government will be taking it over, both Bill and I have coverage for prescriptions and dental thru work. I am so glad that, we do not have to fight for our health care. I could not imagine going thru this journey and having to fight insurance companies at the same time. I really feel for you all south of the border in that respect.

    I have a call in to Bill's oncologist, so hopfully I will hear from her tomorrow morning.
    Glad to hear your Celebrattion was a sucess, you rock girl!

    Hugs,

    Sue

    health care premiums
    We haven't paid health care premiums in Saskatchewan for at least 30 years. We do belong to Blue Cross for drug and dental coverage, but even drugs are covered on a sliding scale depending on income. We are finding this cancer journey hard enough as is....I can't imagine having to handle the details that we have come to take for granted. We have no complaints with our health care system as is.

    Good luck to all.

    Judy
  • hopefulone
    hopefulone Member Posts: 1,043 Member
    Get as many opinions as it takes
    Sue, I echo everyones sentiments. First , sorry that your husband has gone through so much and has to get throught this hurdle now. Definately get a second opinion, and a third, 4th if necessary. One thing I've learned , you MUST be your own advocate in this battle . Good luck to your husband and you. Keeping you in my prayers.
    God BLess
    Diane