We MUST be 'more than 1%' by now!!!!!!
With my sister, and other women I know in the 45-55 age range 'aquiring' this rare rectal cancer, even with no family history....well, I'm on a mission!!!!!
I WILL once again pick up my placard...and hit somebody with it if they don't listen!!!!
OK, thanks for listening...lol
Hugs, Kathi
Comments
-
Hey, Kathi -
Go for it. I'm at the top end of the 1% as I was "just" 55 when diagnosed. (Is it possible to be "just" 55?)
Betsy0 -
Age 46 at diagnosis of stage 3 rectal cancer (4 years to the day today).
Healthy weight, worked out 5 days per week for 2o something years, very little beef in last 20 years or so (1/month would be an over estimation). Good vegie intake for 10 years or so. Only family relative with colon ca an uncle on my mom's side.
Only risk factor was alcohol intake 1-2, 5-6 days per week.
Gotta be more than 1 %.
Mary0 -
Clearly shows that statistics are quite unreliable...by the time they are published they are old and outdated. Just like survival rates, thank goodness.
I had a similar experience at an oncology conference last year. I sat in a room of fellow colorectal cancer patients, all of whom had at least 15 years seniority on me (I was dx at 42), and I asked if it is a good time to consider lowering the age for baseline colonoscopies. The doctor gave me a patronizing look and told me that people dx under age 50 is less than 10%. Kathi, you are beyond unique with the type of cancer you had.
If you are going to lobby for reducing the age from 50 to 40, or younger, for baseline colonoscopies...I'll hold 'em down until they listen or until you are forced to wield your placard!0 -
Kathi,
I was diagnosed at the age of 51, but the doctor said I probably had the beginnings of cancer at the age of 40 and that my children should be checked (colonoscopy) by the age of 30.
What can we do to get this across to the insurance companies and the doctors that many times by the age of 50 is too late?? I'm on that band wagon with you......let's talk.
Kerry0 -
diagnosed with rectal cancer at age 46. I was told that my children should have a colonoscopy at age 30 which means my oldest needs one next year. Her physician has already told her he won't refer her because she is too young. Of course, her insurance requires a referal so she will have to change doctors. Most of them still don't seem to have a clue!
Jamie0 -
Hi Kathi.
The medical world is going to have to change it's guidelines.
I was 42 when I was diagnosed with stage 3 rectal CA.
My medical history:
healthy, NEVER smoked, NEVER drank, NO drugs, NOT overweight,was probably in the best shape of my life.
Weird thing is that I had just had a colonoscopy 1 year prior to this exam and everything was clean as a whistle. ( my father did have colon cancer - think it was stage 1 when he was 62?)
I went in for what I thought were hemorrhoids. SURPRISE! Either he missed it the first time, which I doubt, or it was very fast growing.
Anyway, my daughters are going to have to be checked early. I would like to see them go in as early as 20 -25.
Maybe we can have everyone chime in on this thread then everyone take it to their colorectal doctors and gp's. ( as well as the oncologists )
Barb0 -
stage 3 and 42 years old. My dr told me he should've seen me when I was 40. Grandmother had it at 70. If I didn't have any bleeding it could've been worse. So I'm in the 1%.tkd3g said:Hi Kathi.
The medical world is going to have to change it's guidelines.
I was 42 when I was diagnosed with stage 3 rectal CA.
My medical history:
healthy, NEVER smoked, NEVER drank, NO drugs, NOT overweight,was probably in the best shape of my life.
Weird thing is that I had just had a colonoscopy 1 year prior to this exam and everything was clean as a whistle. ( my father did have colon cancer - think it was stage 1 when he was 62?)
I went in for what I thought were hemorrhoids. SURPRISE! Either he missed it the first time, which I doubt, or it was very fast growing.
Anyway, my daughters are going to have to be checked early. I would like to see them go in as early as 20 -25.
Maybe we can have everyone chime in on this thread then everyone take it to their colorectal doctors and gp's. ( as well as the oncologists )
Barb
Michelle0 -
I was diagnosed at 48 with colon cancer. By the time they took it out the tumour was the size of a "small football" so it had probably been there for ages. I had no risk factors whatsoever: no family history, not overweight, didn't smoke, hadn't eaten red meat for years, took lots of exercise ...
Catherine0 -
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 122K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 673 Leukemia
- 794 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 238 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.2K Ovarian Cancer
- 63 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 542 Sarcoma
- 736 Skin Cancer
- 656 Stomach Cancer
- 192 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.9K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards