Need Positive Thoughts
Comments
-
I am sooo sorry to hear about your Dad. I am VERY HAPPY to hear that you are getting second opinions. It never hurts to get 3rd or 4th with it comes to this beast. I could not believe what your Onc Doc stated that chemo does not get rid of cancer only makes it disappear. Will what about all the 5, 10 & 20+ survivors we have out there?
John Hopkins is a good place for a second opinion. There are many other treatment facilities out there as well. All you have to do is "search".
Keep us posted. Huges and kisses.0 -
Hi,
I'm sending lots of positive vibes for your dad. I seem to remember a post that what they are seeing at the surgical site could be a "false positive" from the scar tissue. I'm sure others will post here about that. I think your first onc is not the one you should go to. Of course the chemo gets rid of the cancer or why would we be taking it? It sounds like your second opinion doc is working towards what is best for your dad. HUGS to you and dad.
Lisa F.0 -
One possible explanation for false lites on a PET scan, especially in the colon, is the way a PET is done. Radioactive glucose is the solution for a PET scan and the radiologist is looking for metabolic uptake. What does the colon do? It metabolizes. So what doctors frequently see is lots of colon activity in PET scans that is not cancer. I think that PET technology is great for lots of things but not colorectal detection. Hope that helps explain what might be going on with your dad.
Johns Hopkins is first rate and you should feel good about the standard of care there.0 -
I don't have any answers for you but I just wanted you to know that I am sending positive vibes your way and praying for the best!houseofclay said:One possible explanation for false lites on a PET scan, especially in the colon, is the way a PET is done. Radioactive glucose is the solution for a PET scan and the radiologist is looking for metabolic uptake. What does the colon do? It metabolizes. So what doctors frequently see is lots of colon activity in PET scans that is not cancer. I think that PET technology is great for lots of things but not colorectal detection. Hope that helps explain what might be going on with your dad.
Johns Hopkins is first rate and you should feel good about the standard of care there.0 -
My great radiologist saw PET activity at the site of the resection (anastomosis), but his reports always said "consistent with post-surgical activity" - never a cause for concern. There is a lot of healing going on there - thus a lot of metabolism - but if the PET "light up" corresponds to the site of healing, it is not even really a "false positive" - it is just what you would expect and not anything of concern.nudgie said:I am sooo sorry to hear about your Dad. I am VERY HAPPY to hear that you are getting second opinions. It never hurts to get 3rd or 4th with it comes to this beast. I could not believe what your Onc Doc stated that chemo does not get rid of cancer only makes it disappear. Will what about all the 5, 10 & 20+ survivors we have out there?
John Hopkins is a good place for a second opinion. There are many other treatment facilities out there as well. All you have to do is "search".
Keep us posted. Huges and kisses.
Take care,
Betsy0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 538 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards