Katie Couric and Colon Cancer
Comments
-
Bryan,
I didn't watch any of Katie Couric's colon cancer series as I start work at 6 a.m. Colon cancer isn't something that happens to only people over 50. I was only 45 when I was diagnosed, with a family history of colon cancer. People need to be made aware that colon cancer can occur at any age, and if you have a family history of it, you need to go for early screening--don't wait until you're 50!!
Melody0 -
I didn't get to see any of the show either as I leave for work at 6:30 a.m., but I most definitely agree with you that colon cancer is not a disease for people over 50. Although my husband Bert was diagnosed in 2003 at stage III and at 51, when they removed the tumor I asked the surgeon in his best, professional opinion, how long had it been growing to be the size it was and to have caused the damage that it did as Bert's tumor grading was borderline 1 to 2, which THANK GOD is not very aggressive. The surgeon's answer was at minimum 5 years!!!! So obviously it started at age 46 if not earlier for Bert and his dad died of the damn disease at age 57...and yes, Bert had been getting screenings, but not the full colonoscopy because HE WASN'T 50 and IT WASN'T RECOMMENDED BY HIS INSURANCE COMPANY. Needless to say, our son, who isn't even 30 yet, will be getting his first colonoscopy shortly.
I also work with someone whose daughter is just hoping to make her 21st birthday...diagnosed with colon cancer at 19!!!!! Family history, you bet...big time.
Monika in L.A. who forever will be on a soap box preaching about when oh when will they finally get it that you don't have to be over 50 to get colon cancer!!!!0 -
I WATCHED THE SAME SERIES. I WAS ONLY 43 WHEN I FOUND OUT I HAD COLON CANCER. IT TOOK THEM THREE YEARS TO FIND IT. tHEN IT WAS TOO LATE TO TAKE CARE OF WITH OUT HAVING TO HAVE A COLOSTOMY THE REST OF MY LIFE. i AM ANGRY THAT THEY FORGET EVERYONE IS DIFFERENT AND THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS TO THE ROLE . I JUST HAD TO OF BEEN ONE OF THE ONES WHO SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES. I HAVE A HARD TIME WITH THIS AND FIND IT HARD FOR PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM GOING THROUGH. I HOPE YOU CAN GET TO HER. I TRIED THE DAY BEFORE MY FIRST SURGERY TO TELL HER BUT I HAD RECIEVED NO REPLY. iT REALLY NEEDS TO GET OUT SO PEOPLE YOUNGER MAY BE ABLE TO READ THE SIGNS AND KNOW THAT YOU DO NOT HAVE TO BE FIFTY OR OLDER TO GET IT.0
-
Ahoy, Bryan -
Great post. Unfortunately I missed Katie's series, too. You are right on target about being "too young". I've shared my story before, but I'll tell it again:
I was 33 when my mom was diagnosed with colon cancer. Armed with my understanding of genetics, the fact of my mother's cancer and the knowledge that her father died from colon cancer; I marched over to the base clinic and asked the doctor to schedule me a colonoscopy. The doctir told me I was too young and that I shouldn't worry about it. I got the same song and dance the next two times I asked, so I dropped it. Lo and behold, 4 years later who has colon cancer with visceral invasion? Based on the size of the masses, how long did the pathologists feel I had been sick? Go figure; about 4-5 years. Guess what the National Cancer Institute found when they did genetic screening on me? I have a genetic mutation that causes colon cancer - maybe I ain't as dumb as the ol' doc thought I wuz.
Doctors telling you you're too young? I have something for you to tell your doctor... but I'll get censored if I write it here.
Thanks, Bryan, for carrying the mail for us young folks (jeez... did I really just describe myself as young? COOL)! Hope you're doing well.
- SpongeBob0 -
Being in recoverery from my surgery the Tuesday before, I was able to watch the entire series.
On Tuesday they had a story about the the ex-football player and how he was diagnosed at 43 and died at 45. I guess this is to be implied that people younger then 50 can get and die from colon cancer too.
As for the colonscopy, I was at first denied a colonoscopy at age 55 and with a family history.
The next year I asked again and this time was approved. It still cost me over $550 out of pocket expense to get the colonoscopy, but it was the best $550 I ever spent.
If I had my colonoscopy the year earlier, I would have most likely been diagnosed and could have even had the adenoma removed during this procedure, with no surgery required. I don't know, I only know what happened and I was one of the lucky ones who had the surgery in time and, at this time, have no positive biopsies.
As you see from my story, you can still be over 50 and have a family history and still get denied. This is such a penny wise, pound foolish decision by the insurance companies.
My adenoma was only 1 cm in size when discovered, but would have been even smaller the year before and probably not been biopsied as pre-cancerous if I had the colonscopy then. My surgery might not have been needed.
You can bet I won't take no for an answer in the future.0 -
Hi Bryan,spongebob said:Ahoy, Bryan -
Great post. Unfortunately I missed Katie's series, too. You are right on target about being "too young". I've shared my story before, but I'll tell it again:
I was 33 when my mom was diagnosed with colon cancer. Armed with my understanding of genetics, the fact of my mother's cancer and the knowledge that her father died from colon cancer; I marched over to the base clinic and asked the doctor to schedule me a colonoscopy. The doctir told me I was too young and that I shouldn't worry about it. I got the same song and dance the next two times I asked, so I dropped it. Lo and behold, 4 years later who has colon cancer with visceral invasion? Based on the size of the masses, how long did the pathologists feel I had been sick? Go figure; about 4-5 years. Guess what the National Cancer Institute found when they did genetic screening on me? I have a genetic mutation that causes colon cancer - maybe I ain't as dumb as the ol' doc thought I wuz.
Doctors telling you you're too young? I have something for you to tell your doctor... but I'll get censored if I write it here.
Thanks, Bryan, for carrying the mail for us young folks (jeez... did I really just describe myself as young? COOL)! Hope you're doing well.
- SpongeBob
I not only missed Katie Couric, but I missed our very own celebrities on the Sharon Osbourne show. I am on a tirade about making colonoscopies a part of a regular examination at least every 5 years, beginning earlier than 50. I was diagnosed at 52 and the surgeon said that I could easily have begun developing the polyp and the disease 10 years prior. Wow! Not only that, I had a sigmoidoscopy the year before I was diagnosed with colon cancer!! Go figure! Why would anyone do a sigmoid that only checks 25% of something when a colonoscopy checks 100%. Insurance companies think they have us by the "you know what".
Celebrities use their influence to vent about politics, etc, I think Katie should use her influence to really make a bigger impact on Colon Cancer Awareness. I talk about it every chance I get - I am not ashamed that I had colon cancer, in fact, if I can make more people aware of the testing available and that it can be a preventable disease, the better I will feel.
I have 2 young (23 and 25) daughters and you can believe they are getting tested asap.
Thanks for the vent. I'm with you. Let me know what to do.
Kerry
p.s. I have also emailed Katie Couric and there has never been an answer. You would think she would have a PR person to take care of that.0 -
Hi Bryan, I was diagnosed last year, a little after my 49th birthday. Almost made it to the 50 yr mark, but how much worse it have been? Considering that even with the good care I got, I have had a recurrecnce less than 6 months later. I am having chemo and radiation and will finish next week then I will have colon resection and permanent colostomy. If only I would had it sooner. I have constant bleeding for 6 months. Had had diarehea for some time and it was blamed on my gall bladder surgery. Also, had bleeding off and on, which they blamed on a hemorhoid. So, who know, I might not be going through this if I had had an earlier colonoscopy. Hope my story helps.
Judy H(grandma047)0 -
Hi Bryancarson, I was dx at age 46 stage 111 after a bout of Breast Cancer at age 44. I was told I could have had my Colon Cancer 10 years pryor. I was getting monthly C.E.A.s for the Breast Cancer but it didn't show nothing going on with any Cancers. Thats why I donot recognize C.E.A. as being helpful for me. I still get them but I don't trust them. l have always thought the starting age for Colonoscopy was wrong.0
-
I was also 29 when I was diagnosed with Stage III colon cancer. I would guess Katie Couric doesn't focus on people younger than 50 because we'll never eradicate the disease in younger people. Insurance companies will pay for colonoscopies if you're over 50, but it's rare if you're under that age. And most people aren't going to pay the money out of their own pocket to have a colonoscopy just as part of their routine check-up. So yes, colon cancer is easily preventable in people over 50, but there will always be young people who end up with it. I would guess Katie Couric is only trying to spread the word for older people because, unfortunately, nothing else is realistic.0
-
Count me too. Female and under fifty (49) when I was diagnosed with stage 4 colon cancer with mets to my duodenum and liver. Ironically, a few months before my diagnosis, I had accompanied an over 50 male friend to his colonoscopy appointment and noticed many other 50+ men in the waiting room. My friend was fine, but a few months later I was diagnosed during a routine exam--my bloodwork showed I was very anemic and my doctor ordered more tests.
I was initially told that my cancer was inoperable and began agressive chemotherapy, which shrank my tumors nearly 70%. Approximately 8 months later, my physicians were willing to try surgery. My colon tumors were in my cecum (near the appendix), so my ascending colon was removed, along with a section of my duodenum. Unfortunately, it would have been too difficult to do any more surgery at that time, so liver resection (4 liver tumors) was not performed. I was told that if the tumors did not grow, that surgery on my liver could be tried again in 6 months. Unfortunately, the liver tumors grew, even after undergoing more chemo. My oncologist gave me very little hope, but I did find a surgeon who thought I would be a good candidate for liver resection and successfully performed the surgery--exactly six months after my first surgery. Since then, I have been undergoing weekly systemic chemo and intra-arterial chemo which is administered through a pump in my liver. So far so good. My last scan looked clear, and I'm almost through with my chemo. Then I'll have another CT scan and hope for the best.
To get back to the point of my reply, colon cancer was not one of the cancers I was ever concerned about, but I have since met several women who were diagnosed well before 50. I feel unlucky to have found out at such a late stage of the cancer, but then I feel lucky that I was diagnosed at all. My only symptom--in retrospect--was weight loss, which I thought was because I was going through a divorce just before my diagnosis.0 -
Hi bryan,Lisa Rose said:Hi Bryan,
Like so many of the others count me in the under 50's group!!! I was diagnosed at 40 years of age.
Lisa
Count me in. I was 39 at dx and my sister was in her 20's. She died at 33. They tell me my tumor may have been in there for up to 10 yrs.
Also, my sister was the first in our family to have intestinal cancer. No family history.
Sorry I missed the show. The TV is usually on Rolie Polie Olie about that time. With 5 kids (homeschooling three) I don't have time to watch TV!
peace, emily0 -
I was 36 when I was diagnosed, and so many people (especially in the medical professional) tell me I am so young for colon cancer. I just don't believe that anymore. I have heard so many stories since my diagnosis of people with colon cancer at a young age (not to mention on this board) that I think that myth needs to just go away! People should be able to get the testing done as early as they deem necessary. And the insurance companies are fools not to allow it. After all, how much more will they spend on advance colon cancer treatment than early colonoscopies! Just my 2 cents!!Lisa Rose said:Hi Bryan,
Like so many of the others count me in the under 50's group!!! I was diagnosed at 40 years of age.
Lisa
Michelle0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.9K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 794 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 63 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 540 Sarcoma
- 734 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards