Side Effects

solder608
solder608 Member Posts: 3
edited March 2014 in Breast Cancer #1
I'm a health psychology graduate student researcher looking at cancer treatments. I was curious if anyone could attest to a phenomenon known as a "signal effect" where individuals undergoing cancer treatments view side effects as a signal that the treament is working. basically, has anyone had the experience that side effects made you feel as if the treatment was working before you could get any objective feedback to tell you whether or not there was a reduction or elimination of tumors? any help at all would be greatly appreciated.

Comments

  • hummingbyrd
    hummingbyrd Member Posts: 950 Member
    #2
    I have bone mets and get zometa once a month, before that I was getting aredia. They both are bisphosphonates used to increase bone mass density. Approximately 48 after infusion and again at 7 days post treatment I would get pain in the bone in the area of tumor. This occured with both mets rt arm and lumbar spine. Now that they are relatively healed only occassionally do I get bone pain after treatment. On my last treatment I did have bone pain at ~ T4. I have CT scans scheduled for Jan 13 as my markers have been elevating since Dec 2001. I suppose it will be "interesting" to see if I have a bone met in my T-spine. I'll post again after scans. hummingbyrd
  • 24242
    24242 Member Posts: 1,398 Member
    #3
    I think I found when expressing the many side affects I was having, I found Doctors didn't want to hear about it they wanted to stay on treatment plan #1 and worry about things like side affects after it was all done. Once treatments were done and I wasn't showing any signs of improving and let me tell you it took another 7 months before I was taken seriously and not just thought to be some depressed cancer patient experiencing anxiety and given every anti depressent in the world and still had side affects. Finally diagnosed with diseases imagine and treated so was able to get on with this thing called living. Can't imagine what you suggest even happening. I think people just think side affects are part of the treatment not so much that it is a sign of it working.
    From my experience.
    Tara
  • hummingbyrd
    hummingbyrd Member Posts: 950 Member
    #4
    hummingbyrd said:

    I have bone mets and get zometa once a month, before that I was getting aredia. They both are bisphosphonates used to increase bone mass density. Approximately 48 after infusion and again at 7 days post treatment I would get pain in the bone in the area of tumor. This occured with both mets rt arm and lumbar spine. Now that they are relatively healed only occassionally do I get bone pain after treatment. On my last treatment I did have bone pain at ~ T4. I have CT scans scheduled for Jan 13 as my markers have been elevating since Dec 2001. I suppose it will be "interesting" to see if I have a bone met in my T-spine. I'll post again after scans. hummingbyrd

    Got to looking at my reply and wasn't sure I was clear about answer.
    Yes, I felt as if the bisphosphonates were working and that was why I had bone pain at the site of the tumors. To me it was a sign, or signal, that the bone was repairing itself. On follow up x-rays moth eaten appearance in right arm was nice and white, like a golfball. On MRI tumor in L-spine had shrunk, so I think it was pain related to bone being repaired...fortunately, I don't have any significant pain with my mets. Two edged sword! hummb
  • rizzo15
    rizzo15 Member Posts: 153 Member
    #5
    I don't know if this is what you mean, but before I started chemo for breast cancer, I had stabbing pains like lightning that radiated from the tumor toward my chest and arm. After each of the first two chemo sessions, the pain reversed direction. It was like the stabbing pains were terminating towards the tumor. My oncologist tells me there was a 1 cm reduction in tumor size (length and width) after each chemo session. That's as far as we've gotten.

Discussion Boards