USPC - how to approach my specialist with questions regarding treatment?

Options
2

Comments

  • Forherself
    Forherself Member Posts: 974 Member
    Options

    Gosh that is hard to hear. But sounds like you were 1A after staging? Hindsight is 20/20 but you did go to a highly qualified clinic and get the best advice. We say it is a sneaky cancer. But there is now lots they can do to deal with this so I am hoping for the best. I remember reading of women in the past who have dealt with this, but I can't remember names. I will have a search for. you. Hugs

  • Willow oaks
    Willow oaks Member Posts: 39 Member
    Options

    Thank you! Not running across many of those ladies on here so far.

  • Willow oaks
    Willow oaks Member Posts: 39 Member
    Options

    I went to MD Anderson….

  • Willow oaks
    Willow oaks Member Posts: 39 Member
    Options

    West Cancer Clinic in Memphis wasn’t comfortable with wait for systems and ordered the CT scan

  • SpringerSpanielMom
    SpringerSpanielMom Member Posts: 137 Member
    Options

    Willow, I'm so glad you had the chemo first time around; that might be why you're still with us. That first round of chemo is supposed to do mop-up. However, your cancer and mine (MMMT with a serous carcinoma element) are known for being sneaky. I really do not think "saving your chemo" would have helped. I believe you can have multiple rounds of carbo taxol as opposed to say, ifosfamide. I have many oncs all over on my team, and I agree MD Anderson and Alabama, for example, do not do scans routinely. My other oncs--Arkansas, local in Austin, do, and after some agonizing, I am more comfortable doing scans, even with some theoretical longterm radiation risk. Dr. Birrer even called for one halfway through chemo, which I did. Having said that, your local onc did a scan pretty quickly (6 months) after you finished chemo, right? That seems like pretty good care. I had another one post-chemo and was going to get one 6 months from now. Maybe I'll move that up, but 3 months post the post chemo scan seemed excessive...best of luck to you. Hang in there. Lots of women on here have survived recurrences just fine.

  • PontoonHappy
    PontoonHappy Member Posts: 12 Member
    Options

    I'm getting more concerned reading this. I am Stage 1A mixed serous/endometrioid and med onc said the risks of chemotherapy would not outweigh benefits (I am very healthy generally). Tumor was small (<2 cm) and did not invade myometrium. So I will get 3 brachytherapy treatments. Second guessing myself but he showed us the 20220 NCCN guidelines. I will have CT every 3 mos to start with. I also posted this question on this discussion board.

  • SpringerSpanielMom
    SpringerSpanielMom Member Posts: 137 Member
    Options

    Nancy, how old are you? I'm just turned 57 this week. I was reasonably healthy going in (mildly obese, pre-diabetic, some hypertension). Chemo (carbo taxol) was not fun, but I'm very glad I did it. However, as I mentioned above, while your diagnosis is bad, mine (MMMT) is worse. I have been researching your cancer because it's mine, and I have seen that some oncs don't do more for yours at 1A, whereas for mine, chemo (and radiation) is recommended almost every single time for 1A. Talk to your onc more about what (s)he perceives as the "risks" of the chemo you'd be getting. Find out the names of that chemo and head back here to get more info. If you have the means, get a second opinion from a major university. Often insurance will cover that; they covered my 3rd and 4th opinions too. I know who the experts are for my cancer, but not for yours. However, MD Anderson (Houston) is never a bad choice. If you get agreement, you get peace of mind. If you get some disagreement (as I did, though not re chemo), you at least have more information. Best of luck.

  • PontoonHappy
    PontoonHappy Member Posts: 12 Member
    Options

    Thanks for your response. I am 65 and healthy generally. The chemotx wold be carbo/paclitaxol. Risks were really in compromising my immune system since I have a chronic lung condition (stable, no meds) but he didnt think there would be an added benefit over brachytx alone in preventing recurrence. Considering a 2nd opinion from MD Anderson. I am at a major cancer center and the reason I went there was so I could feel confident in treatment options, but I'm still 2nd guessing. Bottom line is recurrence is def possible no matter what I choose, hoping to minmize that risk. Thanks again and sending you best wishes for continued good health.

  • SpringerSpanielMom
    SpringerSpanielMom Member Posts: 137 Member
    Options

    Hi Nancy, I have a several posts to answer, as I've been completely offline, so sick for a few days with pain & nausea & temperature control issues. (Chemo's last gasp.) When it comes to it, we're all guessing, weighing the info we have to make our best choices. Nancy, with your lung condition, you have more to weigh than I did; I did not have worries about my immune system going in. I believe it was my MD Anderson doctor who said that while carbo taxol does take out your immune system, it bounces back faster w/that combo than with some others. Not sure that helps you though. My numbers were fine until the labs just before Chemo # 5. My labs on 3/1 were better--cell counts fine, magnesium back up), but my liver labs are still off. Re scans & follow up treatment above, to recap, I was MMMT-E, Stage 1A. I did chemo--carbo taxol 6 rounds & brachytherapy. On Tuesday my gyn onc recommended doing nothing else, even getting the port out. Exams every 3 months. CT scans every 6 months, but every 3 if I want that, w/ caveat insurance may not cover it. Either way, she'd alternate chest/abdomen/pelvis with just abdomen/pelvis. She said Dr. Birrer at Arkansas agrees. I will be getting some more input because it makes me nervous to do nothing given my cancer recurs a lot even for Stage 1A. She told me to "focus on the positives for now"; I found that unhelpful. "Focusing on positives" is in no way incompatible with looking for therapy to prevent recurrences, as is standard for breast cancer patients. (See tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors.)

  • SpringerSpanielMom
    SpringerSpanielMom Member Posts: 137 Member
    Options

    I've been very sick for a few days with chemo's last gasp (finished 2/2), so I'm catching up starting now. To Willow oaks, I am so sorry--I got mixed up on the years in your post. I see now that your follow-up ct scan was about two years after your diagnosis. I don't know why MDA and some others (Alabama) don't do scans (radiation risk), barring usually just one just past chemo, and others (Dr. Birrer, Arkansas; my local in Austin) but I'm so glad your local gyn onc ordered one now. You'll see plenty on these posts about delays and errors in diagnosis and treatment, both initially and on recurrence. I have agonized over mistakes made early on (my gyn, not my gyn onc, thought my tumor was a "benign fibroid" "100% not cancer" and she "had a neat little machine to chop it up". And thus spread it all over my body. Oh no.) My advice is concentrate on the now, and fight the recurrence. Bless you so much; I too am filled with fear sometimes. If you do have colon involvement, my friend did too. She got a re-section and had zero problems with it. To HMcd60, I am 57. First, you're so lucky (I know, so to speak) that the PAP smear found your cancer, because that's unusual. There is no screening whatsoever for uterine and ovarian cancers. As Afoste3 stated, the P53 mutant expression adds more risk of a recurrence, as I understand it, but does it possibly give you more of a target for immunotherapy or targeted therapy? I think it does. (My P53 was wild = non-mutant.) Positive Estrogen receptor status changes treatment also (mine were negative) and certainly suggests looking at therapies to prevent recurrence. Also, you may be told that as yours is estrogen sensitive, it's even more important that you get to a good BMI (25) and stay there, and look at adding metformin, even if you are not pre-diabetic or diabetic. If you are, more important than ever to get those sugars under control. Sorry about your rocky recovery from surgery and glad it's going better now. These are just some options to explore with, as suggested, a major center. I see that some oncs are doing chemo and/or radiation for your cancer Stage 1A and some are not. Yours is very serious but mine (MMMT carcinosarcoma) is worse, so we are almost always told to do chemo and radiation, though I heard that's changing on the east coast USA. I'm glad you're doing some chemo; I did 6 rounds of carbo taxol every 3 wks starting just over 3 weeks after surgery; 5 rds of brachytherapy between Chemos 3-4 with no delay in Chemo 4. You did have cancer, but Stage 1A is the best. NED is great, and many say to enjoy it, remembering that you might be NED forever--"cured". They say why waste time worrying about recurrence? I myself cannot enjoy my NED status yet; I am focused on recurrence and know that for aggressive cancers like MMMT and yours, USPC, somehow these do come back often, roaring back actually, even for Stage 1A. The question is--which 1As and when? I'm currently looking hard for up to date statistics on recurrence, disease free survival, and overall survival, for my cancer & yours, as yours is a component of mine. Re the third party factual way of dealing with it, that is 100% okay. A lot of us only keep our sanity by focusing on the "facts". You said, "how should i feel - i think i am a bit numb and am dealing with it in a third-party factual way rather than personal something that is happening to me- that is a direct threat to the length of my life. Should I keep on the "third-person" thoughts or try and explore what it means to me?" That was so beautifully expressed--thank you. I don't have an answer, but the part about this research of yours being about "something happening to [you] that is a direct threat to the length of my life"--spot on.

  • SpringerSpanielMom
    SpringerSpanielMom Member Posts: 137 Member
    Options

    Willow oaks, thank you so much, eternally, for sharing your story. It will save so many lives. I just shared it with my husband, a doctor, and he said that was his #1 beef with Dr. Arend, Ala--that she doesn't do scans. Jazaeri at MDA too. I am so glad though your mets were caught before symptoms--God bless you. Re "saving" chemo, I was told unlike say ifosfamide's cumulative effect on the heart or bone marrow, you can get multiple rounds of carbo taxol w/o problems (and variations if you get allergic), so you did not need to "save" it. The only thing they (gyn oncs & med onc) told me to "save" was abdominal radiation (brachytherapy was okay) until we really needed it because that would be limited. I really don't think you should second guess yourself about the first chemo. (Or the lack of scans--why wouldn't you trust MDA at first glance? I call it CancerWorld.)

  • Forherself
    Forherself Member Posts: 974 Member
    Options

    I can answer one question you had. CT scans have a large amount of radiation. That is why some institutions use them cautiously. I had not had scans after my surgery.

  • BluebirdOne
    BluebirdOne Member Posts: 656 Member
    Options

    To scan or not to scan, that is the question! I had my treatment at Mayo and they do not recommend routine scans. I was given a scan immediately after finishing chemo/radiation, and one at 6 months post treatment. This was to establish a baseline and then see if the chemo/radiation worked as some of us have progressed while on chemo. After that that they do not routinely offer scans. The reason they gave is that studies showed that scans do not affect the PFS, or OS and there is a cost benefit to not doing them. Remember this would have been over a large population so as a group that could be true, but we are not a group, we are individuals and personally if I am having serious issues, I want a scan. There have been a number of folks here whose recurrences were caught early with a scan, but I do not remember if the scan was routine or if the scan was done in response to an acute complaint. And we do not know if the scan actually prolonged their life. That being said, I have gotten a scan once a year due to issues with pain, and Mayo ordered them as needed so they do allow scans when they think it is necessary. I also developed an allergy to the contrast dye so I have to take extra precautions before every scan to avoid going into shock, so getting a scan has other downsides for me.

    Denise

  • Lyn70
    Lyn70 Member Posts: 214 Member
    Options

    Scan or not to scan...

    I had a CT after visiting my Primary and discussing my post menopausal bleeding. My Primary said she 'felt something' on my exam. The CT report came back as FIBROIDS. My Primary insisted I see a gyn and after a vaginal ultrasound and biopsy, I had a hysterectomy and pathology dx. IIIA endometrial adenocarcinoma with 98% myometrial invasion and extensive LVSI: High Risk for Metastases

    I am in a Cancer Survivors program and my plan says for High Risk patients 'radiology tests not routinely recommend'. I am not pleased with that. I expect a scan in either June or July of 2022. I developed this cancer with little pain. I have read of too many metastases found on this board by scans without symptoms. I don't feel I am a competent judge of my health but I want to be the best advocate.

  • Willow oaks
    Willow oaks Member Posts: 39 Member
    Options

    Now I’m trying to decide what to do. Thought I might make into a blind trial but it has closed anywhere close to me. Can’t seem to get input from MDA without a 20 hour round trip drive. Don’t know if I need to delay treatment bouncing around too much. Seems so far I’m left with SOC answer of the original Pac/Tax plus Avastin for reoccurrence. Does anyone have experience with the results if that? She says the reason it’s SOC is that it does sometimes or often work to some degree.

  • PontoonHappy
    PontoonHappy Member Posts: 12 Member
    Options

    I so appreciate everyones comments. I too am constantly researching recurrence for Stage 1A with my characteristics. Have recently found some articles supporting VBT only, no chemotherapy. Seems in the past there was a lot of "selection bias" because many institutions went directly to chemotx with serous cells. Those who didn't get it were generally older with other comorbidities so possibly were going to have worse outcomes anyway. This one made sense to me, but of course it says what I want to hear. Anyway, I do have to figure out how to stop obsessing over recurrence becasue it is ruining my days. Maybe it's too soon (this just started for me December 1) but I am going to pursue counseling.

    J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 May; 29(3): e34.

    Prognostic factors for patients with early-stage uterine serous carcinoma without adjuvant therapy.



  • thatblondegirl
    thatblondegirl Member Posts: 385 Member
    Options

    Hey, Nancy

    I’m sorry you’re struggling with all of this. I still can’t be of help as to your kind of cancer, but I did want to try to help with your emotional suffering. It IS still very new for you…just three months.

    For several months after my diagnosis the first word in my head every morning was “cancer.” I hated that! Then for the next 4+ months I was consumed trying not to die from the chemo! 😁 That’s a bit of an exaggeration, but not too much! I was completely distracted! My first thought every morning became, “Don’t throw up!” And then there’s the post-chemo scan anxiety. And for me another 3 mths until the second CT was clean! (They we’re watching a couple of benign seromas.)

    My point…..this is a process, just like in other of life’s tragedies ….getting from one step to the next…doing your research….making decisions…THEN…I think it will recede from the front of your mind and then you’ll be better. It WILL get better!

    ❤️❤️❤️, Alicia

  • SpringerSpanielMom
    SpringerSpanielMom Member Posts: 137 Member
    Options

    I said, "I have been researching your cancer because it's mine"--I should have said "part of mine". Mine is MMMT-E carcinosarcoma; it has three elements: endometroid carcinoma; papillary serous carcinoma; and a homologous sarcoma. Sorry for any confusion.

  • SpringerSpanielMom
    SpringerSpanielMom Member Posts: 137 Member
    Options

    Thanks, Forherself. I will say scans that are clear are enormously comforting. One part of me agrees re the radiation risk, but the cynical part wonders if it has to do more with cost. Remember the huge fights over having mammograms covered? Anyway, it's moot for me, because my local onc will do them every three months if I want that. I might split the difference and start w/ one 4-6 months after my standard post-chemo one, and then if all goes well, space them out further. What about my local onc's idea of alternating chest/abdomen/pelvic w/ just abdomen/pelvic? That would reduce radiation some. Someone here or on Facebook said, "If you get 10 full body ct scans, you'll get leukemia". I do know a couple (husband AND wife) who got chronic leukemia but I don't know that they had any ct scans. Also, none of us, I think, are getting full body ct scans. I do pat-downs at the airport and limit my dental x-rays. Overseas flights give you some radiation too, but if I get the chance to go to Europe again, I'm taking it! :-)