Accuracy of CT scans in Right Colon Cancer
Here's a scary one: CT scans were inaccurate in almost half of the scans examined: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30870227
Of 150 CT scans reviewed, CT failed to identify primary cancer in 19.3%. Overall accuracy of CT to identify unfavorable pathologic features was 63% with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 63% (95% CI, 54%-71%), 63% (95% CI, 46%-81%), 87% (95% CI, 80%-94%) and 30% (95% CI, 18%-41%). Only cT3/4 (55% vs 45%; p = 0.001) and cN+ (42% vs 58%; p = 0.02) were significantly associated with correct identification of unfavorable features at final pathology. CT scans overstaged and understaged cT in 23.7% and 48.3% and cN in 28.7% and 53.0% of cases. . . Accuracy of CT scan for identification of pT3/4, pN+, or pre-extramural venous invasion positivity was insufficient to allow for proper identification of patients at high risk for local recurrence and/or in whom to consider alternative treatment strategies. Locoregional overstaging and understaging resulted in inappropriate treatment strategies in <48%.
Comments
-
Scan
Being that mine was in the rectum, my radiologist could hardly see it so I'm thinking that if they didn't know where it was, they might not have spotted it. I'm confident that the real good detection for colon or rectal cancer is a scope. That way it is closer up and they can see with a camera everything that needs to be seen.
Kim
0 -
AccuracyAnnabelle41415 said:Scan
Being that mine was in the rectum, my radiologist could hardly see it so I'm thinking that if they didn't know where it was, they might not have spotted it. I'm confident that the real good detection for colon or rectal cancer is a scope. That way it is closer up and they can see with a camera everything that needs to be seen.
Kim
For me, it was a bit weird. Despite both a CT and a colonoscopy, it turns out the tumor was not where they expected it. For me, it meant removing less of the colon, which was a good thing. But it also makes me wonder about the accuracy of a CT scan to evaluate whether or not there is a recurrence.
0 -
Both of my last 2 CT scans
Both of my last 2 CT scans have come back clean. Im scheduled for both a CT and PET in May. My CEA is 2 and blood work looks good. I was told Thursday I'm in remission, but that was based on the CT scans. Makes me wonder if the lady bee an error. Still celebrating and I'll deal with any issues after May.
0 -
ExactlySandiaBuddy said:Accuracy
For me, it was a bit weird. Despite both a CT and a colonoscopy, it turns out the tumor was not where they expected it. For me, it meant removing less of the colon, which was a good thing. But it also makes me wonder about the accuracy of a CT scan to evaluate whether or not there is a recurrence.
I'm not confident in a CT scan to see if there is one in the colon or rectum. Other areas and organs outside of that I'm more confident. Inside the colon is a different story. My surgeon wanted a colonoscopy every two years for 4 years and then 3 years. I'm more comfortable with that testing and never the home test were you just send your sample away.
Kim
0 -
ScansDjspareme said:Both of my last 2 CT scans
Both of my last 2 CT scans have come back clean. Im scheduled for both a CT and PET in May. My CEA is 2 and blood work looks good. I was told Thursday I'm in remission, but that was based on the CT scans. Makes me wonder if the lady bee an error. Still celebrating and I'll deal with any issues after May.
I'm still a believer that CT scans are a good detection for organs, just not so much the inside of colon for polyps and such as those need to be biopsed. You are good to celebrate and you deserve it.
Kim
0 -
Scans
I had a cat scan near my home that said I was NED. A week later my Oncologist had me have one at the hospital where I normally
go an hour away. It said I had 5 lung nodules. That is what it has been. I think it is the person reading and reporting from the scan,
not the scanners themselves.
0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards