after prostate cancer has metasized
Mike
Comments
-
My experience appears to be quite different but maybe the following would be informative to others:
I was diagnosed in late 2000 and had a failed cryoblation procedure in April 2001. The cryoblation procedure either failed to destroy all cancerous cells or it was already outside the prostate capsule. After cryoablation, my PSA began exponentially rising, finally reaching 146. Although MRIs and various scans showed no soft tissue metastases, I had bone metastases to the right shoulder, neck, spine, a few ribs, and the pelvis. I was placed on what is called "bicalutimide monotherapy," in other words, this was a Casodex regimen only, without total androgen ablation (Lupron, etc.), or an orchiectomy.
I have been on bicalutimide monotherapy (Casodex only) now going on 17 months as of today, 2-15-05.
When first starting the Casodex-only regimen nearly a year and a half ago, my PSA dropped from 146 to only 11 in 16-days. I have no bone pain or other symptoms, except those from Casodex, which are hardly worth mentioning. In other words, I feel as if I do not have cancer at all.
It is my understanding that Casodex can become refractory (ceases to work) after an average of 3 years, but some have been able to stay on it for up to 5 years before PSA starts to once again rise. While on Casodex, close monitoring of liver toxicity is required as it can have major effects on liver function. In the event this happens, the treatment protocol requires switching from bicalutimide (Casodex) to flutimide...which has a similar affect as Casodex.
Oddly enough, studies described on the major oncology sites indicate there is little to no difference in survival times between more traditional treatment with total androgen ablation (Lupron, etc.), orchiectomy, and bicalutimide adjuvant therapy vs bicalutimide monotherapy, i.e., Casodex only. Although a novel treatment protocol, this approach has always been available, but apparently was not put into practice in the U.S., although it is very common in Europe.
In layperson terms, Casodex works by targeting and placing a "blindfold" on the hormone receptors of prostate cancerous cells so they cannot "see" the presence of testosterone, whether the source of testosterone is the adrenal glands or testes. Ironically, Casodex also cause dramatic increases in testosterone levels to the point it eventually becomes refractory when prostate cancerous cells are eventually able to see through "holes in the blindfold."
All I can say is, it darn sure works for me. My bicalutimide monotherapy (Casodex only) treatment protocol was prescribed by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center-Houston.
I am unsure of what circumstances would qualify or disqualify a patient for bicalutimide monotherapy. However, I can say, my Gleason score indicated a rather aggressive form of cancer, but I was in good health otherwise, had no liver problems, and was at the age of 63 at the time I was put on the regimen.
Good Luck,
"Perry"0 -
Perry,nodawgs said:My experience appears to be quite different but maybe the following would be informative to others:
I was diagnosed in late 2000 and had a failed cryoblation procedure in April 2001. The cryoblation procedure either failed to destroy all cancerous cells or it was already outside the prostate capsule. After cryoablation, my PSA began exponentially rising, finally reaching 146. Although MRIs and various scans showed no soft tissue metastases, I had bone metastases to the right shoulder, neck, spine, a few ribs, and the pelvis. I was placed on what is called "bicalutimide monotherapy," in other words, this was a Casodex regimen only, without total androgen ablation (Lupron, etc.), or an orchiectomy.
I have been on bicalutimide monotherapy (Casodex only) now going on 17 months as of today, 2-15-05.
When first starting the Casodex-only regimen nearly a year and a half ago, my PSA dropped from 146 to only 11 in 16-days. I have no bone pain or other symptoms, except those from Casodex, which are hardly worth mentioning. In other words, I feel as if I do not have cancer at all.
It is my understanding that Casodex can become refractory (ceases to work) after an average of 3 years, but some have been able to stay on it for up to 5 years before PSA starts to once again rise. While on Casodex, close monitoring of liver toxicity is required as it can have major effects on liver function. In the event this happens, the treatment protocol requires switching from bicalutimide (Casodex) to flutimide...which has a similar affect as Casodex.
Oddly enough, studies described on the major oncology sites indicate there is little to no difference in survival times between more traditional treatment with total androgen ablation (Lupron, etc.), orchiectomy, and bicalutimide adjuvant therapy vs bicalutimide monotherapy, i.e., Casodex only. Although a novel treatment protocol, this approach has always been available, but apparently was not put into practice in the U.S., although it is very common in Europe.
In layperson terms, Casodex works by targeting and placing a "blindfold" on the hormone receptors of prostate cancerous cells so they cannot "see" the presence of testosterone, whether the source of testosterone is the adrenal glands or testes. Ironically, Casodex also cause dramatic increases in testosterone levels to the point it eventually becomes refractory when prostate cancerous cells are eventually able to see through "holes in the blindfold."
All I can say is, it darn sure works for me. My bicalutimide monotherapy (Casodex only) treatment protocol was prescribed by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center-Houston.
I am unsure of what circumstances would qualify or disqualify a patient for bicalutimide monotherapy. However, I can say, my Gleason score indicated a rather aggressive form of cancer, but I was in good health otherwise, had no liver problems, and was at the age of 63 at the time I was put on the regimen.
Good Luck,
"Perry"
Thank you for the information regarding your experience with prostate cancer. I was interested to know the extent of your discomfort with spine , back & ribs. I have a nagging unfcomfortable feeling in my lower back, when i try to do chores around the house scraping wallpaper, shoveling snow and so forth I get pain in my rib cage area radiating from back to front and my lower back pain intensifies. Do you experience sililar discomfort in these areas. Every once in a while I just have a bad couple days, thank God for Vicadin.
Michael0 -
I feel nothing, zero, zilch from bone metastases. I initially had a "baseline scan" from which to compare all subsequent scans. Full body bone scans were done every three months. The metastases are there, but the Casodex (bicalutimide) not only puts replication of prostate cancerous cells in suspension, but allows healing of bone tissue, as indicated in numerous scans after the initial baseline scan. Of course, this regimen doesn't last forever, but sooner or later becomes refractory, once again, allowing a dramatic rise in PSA and reactivation of metastatic growth and spread. What I'll do then...I suspect some version of salvage therapy. If the salvage therapy results in a quality of life I don't consider acceptable, I might just skip the whole idea.mbeavers said:Perry,
Thank you for the information regarding your experience with prostate cancer. I was interested to know the extent of your discomfort with spine , back & ribs. I have a nagging unfcomfortable feeling in my lower back, when i try to do chores around the house scraping wallpaper, shoveling snow and so forth I get pain in my rib cage area radiating from back to front and my lower back pain intensifies. Do you experience sililar discomfort in these areas. Every once in a while I just have a bad couple days, thank God for Vicadin.
Michael
Sometimes, I think the lack of truly effective treatment having the potential for a cure is due to research being focused on areas of higher priority and/or where the large pharmaceuticals can establish market shares in areas more profitable. Long story short, a bunch of old dudes on medicare ain't their target.0 -
My experience is similar to that of NoDawgs. I have been on mono Casodex for 14 months and the PSA has remained at 0.1 after rising to 0.3 when I started the drug on May 1, 2004. Other than some breast tenderness and puffiness, I have no physical symptoms from it. However, I believe that my emotions have been more volatile. Maybe that's because I realize what probably lies ahead, after the Casodex no longer does what it's supposed to.nodawgs said:My experience appears to be quite different but maybe the following would be informative to others:
I was diagnosed in late 2000 and had a failed cryoblation procedure in April 2001. The cryoblation procedure either failed to destroy all cancerous cells or it was already outside the prostate capsule. After cryoablation, my PSA began exponentially rising, finally reaching 146. Although MRIs and various scans showed no soft tissue metastases, I had bone metastases to the right shoulder, neck, spine, a few ribs, and the pelvis. I was placed on what is called "bicalutimide monotherapy," in other words, this was a Casodex regimen only, without total androgen ablation (Lupron, etc.), or an orchiectomy.
I have been on bicalutimide monotherapy (Casodex only) now going on 17 months as of today, 2-15-05.
When first starting the Casodex-only regimen nearly a year and a half ago, my PSA dropped from 146 to only 11 in 16-days. I have no bone pain or other symptoms, except those from Casodex, which are hardly worth mentioning. In other words, I feel as if I do not have cancer at all.
It is my understanding that Casodex can become refractory (ceases to work) after an average of 3 years, but some have been able to stay on it for up to 5 years before PSA starts to once again rise. While on Casodex, close monitoring of liver toxicity is required as it can have major effects on liver function. In the event this happens, the treatment protocol requires switching from bicalutimide (Casodex) to flutimide...which has a similar affect as Casodex.
Oddly enough, studies described on the major oncology sites indicate there is little to no difference in survival times between more traditional treatment with total androgen ablation (Lupron, etc.), orchiectomy, and bicalutimide adjuvant therapy vs bicalutimide monotherapy, i.e., Casodex only. Although a novel treatment protocol, this approach has always been available, but apparently was not put into practice in the U.S., although it is very common in Europe.
In layperson terms, Casodex works by targeting and placing a "blindfold" on the hormone receptors of prostate cancerous cells so they cannot "see" the presence of testosterone, whether the source of testosterone is the adrenal glands or testes. Ironically, Casodex also cause dramatic increases in testosterone levels to the point it eventually becomes refractory when prostate cancerous cells are eventually able to see through "holes in the blindfold."
All I can say is, it darn sure works for me. My bicalutimide monotherapy (Casodex only) treatment protocol was prescribed by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center-Houston.
I am unsure of what circumstances would qualify or disqualify a patient for bicalutimide monotherapy. However, I can say, my Gleason score indicated a rather aggressive form of cancer, but I was in good health otherwise, had no liver problems, and was at the age of 63 at the time I was put on the regimen.
Good Luck,
"Perry"0 -
Prostate cancer
My husband has prostate cancer and his Psa level was 72 and his gleason score was a 9, he did 28 radiation treatments and is taking hormon theeapy, he just had his fiest psa level done since his treatment and it went down to3.91 I was wondering if anyone else with these high numbers an maby had the same treatments he had could share thier outcome with me. I know he has to have more psa levels checked to make sure they stay down just would like to know how well these treatment have worked for others Thanks, his concerned oie lady
0 -
Please start a new threadJeanette Cain said:Prostate cancer
My husband has prostate cancer and his Psa level was 72 and his gleason score was a 9, he did 28 radiation treatments and is taking hormon theeapy, he just had his fiest psa level done since his treatment and it went down to3.91 I was wondering if anyone else with these high numbers an maby had the same treatments he had could share thier outcome with me. I know he has to have more psa levels checked to make sure they stay down just would like to know how well these treatment have worked for others Thanks, his concerned oie lady
Hi, Jeanette. This is a very old thread. My husband and I are early in this process but there’s lots of folks here who can advise you. Why don’t you start a new topic? I’ll be looking for your post.
0 -
PS how to postfullmoon50 said:Please start a new thread
Hi, Jeanette. This is a very old thread. My husband and I are early in this process but there’s lots of folks here who can advise you. Why don’t you start a new topic? I’ll be looking for your post.
PS click on Discussion Boards and right above “Recommended for you” is the link to add new forum topic.
0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.9K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 794 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 63 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 540 Sarcoma
- 734 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.9K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards