Treatment for secondary tumour without doing a biopsy?

LauraCF
LauraCF Member Posts: 27

Has anybody here ever had treatment (surgery/chemo/radiation) for a secondary tumour without first having a biopsy?

I'm concerned that mhy partner's doctor's are making an assumption about his tumour without checking to see what it actually is.  We've encountered unpardonable delays, miscommunication and outright incompetence among admin personnel throughout his cancer treatment so far, and I'm at the point where I do not trust any of these people.

Comments

  • Trubrit
    Trubrit Member Posts: 5,804 Member
    No delays

    Really! There should be no delays, miscommunication or incompetence when dealing with a cancer diagnosis (or any medical condition). 

    Have you tried for a second opinion with another oncologist?  

    TRU

  • PamRav
    PamRav Member Posts: 348 Member
    edited April 2017 #3
    I'm with Trubit

    run don't walk for a second opinion. 

  • abrub
    abrub Member Posts: 2,174 Member
    I had surgery for a secondary tumor without a biopsy.

    My surgeon was so certain that it was a recurrence that 1) he didn't want to waste time and possibly spread cells by doing a biopsy, and 2) he told me point-blank that if the biopsy had come back negative, he wouldn't have believed it.  He would have assumed that they missed the tumor cells.  I had the surgery; it was cancer.

    That said, I have nothing but the utmost confidence in my surgeon, and his reasoning made sense to me.  When in doubt, get that second opinion from another facility.

  • NewHere
    NewHere Member Posts: 1,429 Member
    I Had Surgery For Met To Lung Without Biopsy

    Much like Abrub.  What happened was my CEA went up a good amount based on all my prior CEA levels.  The Oncologist then sent me to get MRI.  All indications were that the thing in my lung was cancer.  They then sent me for PET scan, the uptake looked like cancer.  (MRI and PET each indicated 75% chance of cancer.)  Was referred to the thoracic surgeon.  Same feeling - either a benign tumor, a met of colon cancer or new cancer in lung.  The surgeon was fairly certain it was cancer of some form.  (My original colon surgery had clean margins, but many lymph nodes were cancerous.  3-4 is usually concerning.  I had 11 out of 20)

    I go to MSK (like Abrub) and like Abrub I have a lot of faith in the doctors there.  

    As to the communication issues and the rest you are describing, Tru and Pam said it.  Go find a second opinion.  And another oncologist.  You want to be comfortable with all this as much as possible.  

  • beaumontdave
    beaumontdave Member Posts: 1,289 Member
    On my first reoccurance, they

    On my first reoccurance, they biopsied and didn't get a positive, and the onc said it should be removed anyway, probably based on the rising CEA. If they're certain based on all the other tests, I could see them skipping it, but if they're being sloppy with the treatment, I'd question everything and press them hard.

  • Bellen
    Bellen Member Posts: 281 Member
    edited April 2017 #7
    Biopsy

    Hello Laura - I originally had an ultrasound for a physical - showed multiple spots in my liver (around 15), next had CT indicated high possibility metastatic cancer, had liver biopsy.  It was adenocarcinoma, which Onco said would be primary in the glands (I believe, not positive of term) like the intestinal tract.  A colonoscopy confirmed colon cancer.  Started folfiri (now chemo #14).  

    I had many delays in our Canadian, supposedly "free" health care - but very, very slow for specialist's referrals - we pay quite high taxes in Canada, which I'm sure a lot is allocated to health coverage, so as far as being free - well. It turned out to be very frustrating, exhausting and nervewracking (no liver specialist in our city).  My husband and I had to make numerous phone calls and be such advocates to get biopsy and cancer appt, etc in timely manner, inspite of my own, wonderful GP doing everything right to get me timely care.  My husband finally got an appt with a wonderful Onco, but we have a 2 1/2 hr trip each way - makes for an extremely, busy long day, but worth it because I really respect and think this Onco is so hopeful and knowledgeable - very happy with my care.  

    I do think you need to know the type of cancer through a biopsy, if it is possible to biopsy the tumour.  Best of luck.

  • LauraCF
    LauraCF Member Posts: 27
    edited April 2017 #8
    Being in Canada, second

    Being in Canada, second opinion is impossible since you're drawing from the same pool of cancer specialists/surgeons that probably already discussed your case. 

    Yes, I appreciate that we don't have to mortgage our house to pay for all of this, but a four-month delay where nobody can tell you who is in charge of your case (answer: nobody) and therefore no treatment plan has been put together is not normal even under our admittedly slow medical system.  It's not as though we sat at home doing nothing; we made numerous calls to all and sundry and got a run-around for months. Shameful.  And now as a result of the delay my partner is heavily addicted to narcotics and will have to spend part of his summer getting off them.  

    At any rate, we now have a treatment date for next week, so it's too late for a biopsy. 

     

  • GSP2
    GSP2 Member Posts: 103 Member
    edited April 2017 #9
    Depends on various factors, for example

    Did the cancer metastasize to a predictable location ?

    Is it behaving in a characteristic pattern ?

    Is the treatment palliative or for cure ?

    Always weighing risk vs benefit for diagnosis and treatment.

     

  • LauraCF
    LauraCF Member Posts: 27
    edited April 2017 #10
    The cancer did NOT

    The cancer did NOT metastasize to a predictable location.  Apparently it skipped everything; liver, lungs, even the lymph nodes (which were also clean after the initial post-surgical biopsy two years ago).

    Behaving like the slow growing colorectal tumour it apparently is.

    Treatment is possibly curative; no appreciable data. If he later opts for surgery, there is a small chance of cure, too, but again, very llittle data.

     

  • LindaK.
    LindaK. Member Posts: 506 Member
    Sorry

    I'm sorry for what you are going through.  Unfortunately, there are bad doctors everywhere.  My husband also was mistreated in a horrendous hospital and cancer center just a few miles from our home in the US.  When he had his recurrence, he went to all the doctors; surgeon, gp, oncologist, GI.  He had a 1 year follow up colonoscopy and stupid GI doctor told him to lose weight.  A few weeks later he was in the ED with a 2nd tumor in his small intestines in bad shape.  Had to wait 6 days for his original surgeon to see him (he was part of a 4-surgeon team who all came to see him to get their co-pays) but no one ordered any tests.  He was being treated for constipation and they did 1 x-ray every day.  I kept asking to see the x-rays but idiot resident team kept laughing at me.  He finally "fired" that resident team and I considered calling 911 to get him out of that hospital.  It was a nightmare, 21 days in patient, c-diff, bad treatment all around.  It happens and it really stinks for the patient and the caretaker.  Our daughter worked at that hospital so we took her advice, looking back, I wish we had never gone there from day 1. 

    Can you go to a different hospital where he might get different doctors?  I'm not sure how the system works, but it's worth a try.  Sometimes you have to be the squeaky wheel and throw a fit to get anything accomplished.  I'm embarrassed to say I was "that wife" more than once.

  • LauraCF
    LauraCF Member Posts: 27
    Hi Linda,

    Hi Linda,

    No, unfortunately going to different doctors/hospital is not possible in Canada with respect to cancer treatment.  

  • abrub
    abrub Member Posts: 2,174 Member
    LauraCF said:

    The cancer did NOT

    The cancer did NOT metastasize to a predictable location.  Apparently it skipped everything; liver, lungs, even the lymph nodes (which were also clean after the initial post-surgical biopsy two years ago).

    Behaving like the slow growing colorectal tumour it apparently is.

    Treatment is possibly curative; no appreciable data. If he later opts for surgery, there is a small chance of cure, too, but again, very llittle data.

     

    My met was also unusual.

    My dr said he'd never seen it in the vaginal cuff before, but he was absolutely certain that it was cancerous, and wouldn't trust a pre-op biopsy.  He was right - it was the same cancer they found in my appendix 9 years earlier.