Castrate Resistant PCa (CRPC)
Comments
-
Extended HRPC in intratumoral therapies
Interesting article but I am not so sure if the patients in the study were castrate resistant. Last January Ira (http://csn.cancer.org/node/265961) also provided a link related to a similar theme with regards to cell’s AR (androgen receptors) via genetics in PCa (Custom-Fit Treatments for Prostate Cancer). The link informs about the work of researchers at Memorial Sloan-Kettering who identified the reason behind the benefits of combo therapies (HT+RT). The researcher (a radiation oncologist) say this “….androgen's role in prostate cancer goes beyond providing fuel for the tumor's growth; the male sex hormone also activates androgen receptors that turn on genes which repair damaged DNA….” This could be due to the power our cells (or genes) have as demonstrated in the Darwin’s principle, the mechanism of natural selection (survival of the fittest). Here is the link;
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303819704579318943273912098
The study of your thread (AR-V7 and Resistance to Enzalutamide and Abiraterone in Prostate Cancer ) involves many famous researchers one of them the head of oncology Dr. Mario Eisenberger in Johns Hopkins.(my commandant till 2006). Their findings in HRPC patients could mean that this AR-V7 (RNA) was already existent in cells before start taking the intratumoral HT drugs (Zytiga or Xtandi) that later was found not to work at a number of patients, as a natural environment of our genes codes. But it could be that cells created such AR variant once threatened with the possibility of dying, as much as it is known that the same cell got the power to start producing its own androgens. All these theories justify Darwin’s evolutionary principle. I believe that our scientists are in the good track to find that silver bullet via DNA. At this time we may use it to get the best in treatments till the day we manage to alter the RNA sequence to live for good or, if such is impossible, then to live to the age we most prefer.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/08/140826091051.htm
Regards,
VG
0 -
AR-V7 Variant in CRPCVascodaGama said:Extended HRPC in intratumoral therapies
Interesting article but I am not so sure if the patients in the study were castrate resistant. Last January Ira (http://csn.cancer.org/node/265961) also provided a link related to a similar theme with regards to cell’s AR (androgen receptors) via genetics in PCa (Custom-Fit Treatments for Prostate Cancer). The link informs about the work of researchers at Memorial Sloan-Kettering who identified the reason behind the benefits of combo therapies (HT+RT). The researcher (a radiation oncologist) say this “….androgen's role in prostate cancer goes beyond providing fuel for the tumor's growth; the male sex hormone also activates androgen receptors that turn on genes which repair damaged DNA….” This could be due to the power our cells (or genes) have as demonstrated in the Darwin’s principle, the mechanism of natural selection (survival of the fittest). Here is the link;
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303819704579318943273912098
The study of your thread (AR-V7 and Resistance to Enzalutamide and Abiraterone in Prostate Cancer ) involves many famous researchers one of them the head of oncology Dr. Mario Eisenberger in Johns Hopkins.(my commandant till 2006). Their findings in HRPC patients could mean that this AR-V7 (RNA) was already existent in cells before start taking the intratumoral HT drugs (Zytiga or Xtandi) that later was found not to work at a number of patients, as a natural environment of our genes codes. But it could be that cells created such AR variant once threatened with the possibility of dying, as much as it is known that the same cell got the power to start producing its own androgens. All these theories justify Darwin’s evolutionary principle. I believe that our scientists are in the good track to find that silver bullet via DNA. At this time we may use it to get the best in treatments till the day we manage to alter the RNA sequence to live for good or, if such is impossible, then to live to the age we most prefer.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/08/140826091051.htm
Regards,
VG
This is an exciting time with regard to PCa research & clinical study findings, especially the recently published identification of AR-V7 as a variant of the androgen receptor in CRPC. It will be interesting to see if larger scale clinical trials further validate the AR-V7 study findings as well as other genetic pathways with regard to individualized/unique PCa tumor treatment programs for men with high risk disease & CRPC. As a matter of fact, several presenters at the 3-day PCRI Conference on PCa this weekend mentioned AR-V7 and its potential in high risk PCa tx planning.Here's a July 2014 ASCOpost article (prior to the Sept 3, 2014 publication of the study in the NEJM, linked in my original post above):"AR-V7 Predicts Resistance to Enzalutamide and Abiraterone in Men With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer"By Alice GoodmanJuly 10, 2014, Volume 5, Issue 11Androgen receptor (AR) splice variant 7 (V7) appears to be a new biomarker for response and disease progression in patients treated with enzalutamide (Xtandi) or abiraterone (Zytiga). The presence of AR-V7 in circulating tumor cells predicted resistance to both drugs in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in a study presented at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting in Chicago. The ASCO study comes on the heels of the first public report on AR-V7 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide, which was presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (see the May 15 issue of The ASCO Post, page 14).Both enzalutamide and abiraterone target the androgen receptor. It is not yet clear whether AR-V7 would predict poor response to other therapies used for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that are not directed at AR, such as sipuleucel-T (Provenge) or radium-223 (Xofigo).Potential Biomarker“If these results are supported by larger studies, detection of AR-V7 in circulating tumor cells may be used as a biomarker to predict resistance to enzalutamide, abiraterone, and AR-targeted agents, facilitate treatment selection, and fuel the development of AR N-terminal domain inhibitors,” stated lead author Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, MD, Asssistant Professor of Oncology at Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore.Use of a simple blood test to detect AR-V7 has the potential to streamline therapeutic decision-making and steer patients who test positive for AR-V7 to other therapies that may be more effective. This test also has the potential to facilitate more prudent use of health-care resources.Dr. Antonarakis and colleagues will continue to study AR-V7, but he said the blood test is not yet ready for routine use. “Before we are ready to use AR-V7 status to make treatment decisions, we would first like to obtain CLIA certification for our assay, as well as to validate our results using larger enzalutamide/abiraterone datasets with available clinical samples for analysis. Hopefully, our findings will be replicated very quickly by other multiple groups as well,” he said in an interview with The ASCO Post.“At this time,” he continued, “it would probably be unwise to withhold enzalutamide or abiraterone from patients who test positive for AR-V7. But if such patients are offered these drugs, they should be monitored very closely for signs of progression, and the treating clinician should have a low threshold for switching these patients to alternative treatments, such as chemotherapies or radiotherapies.”Although there are a number of AR splice variants, studies by Dr. Antonarakis and others suggest that AR-V7 is the most important one. The expression of AR-V7 is increased 20-fold in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and it can be detected in clinical samples.Study DetailsThe study he reported at the Annual Meeting included men with castration-resistant prostate cancer who were about to begin treatment with enzalutamide (n = 31) or abiraterone (n = 31). Circulating tumor cell samples were collected at baseline, at the time of response to either drug, and at the time of resistance to either drug. The two-part test used to detect AR-V7 included the Adna Test Prostate Cancer Select kit (to isolate circulating tumor cells) and the Adna Test Prostate Cancer Detect kit (AdnaGen, Langenhagen, Germany). Outcomes were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (> 50% PSA decline), PSA progression-free survival, clinical/radiographic progression-free survival, and overall survival (which is still premature).In the enzalutamide cohort, 38.7% were AR-V7–positive and 61.3% were AR-V7–negative. Overall, about two-third of patients had received previous abiraterone and docetaxel and about one-third had visceral metastasis (the percentages of patients with these characteristics were much higher among AR-V7–positive patients).Best PSA response was 0% in the AR-V7–positive patients compared with 52.6% in the AR-V7–negative group. PSA progression-free survival and clinical/radiographic progression-free survival were significantly better in the AR-V7–negative patients (P < .001 for both endpoints).In the abiraterone cohort, 19.4% were AR-V7–positive and 80.6% were AR-V7–negative. Overall, only 12.9% had received prior enzalutamide, 16.1% had received prior docetaxel, and 25.8% had visceral metastases.Best PSA response was 0% in the AR-V7–positive patients compared with 68% in the AR-V7–negative group. As in the enzalutamide cohort, PSA progression-free survival and clinical/radiographic progression-free survival were significantly better in the AR-V7–negative group (P < .001 for both endpoints).Among 58 evaluable patients, those who were AR-V7–positive at baseline, remained so in subsequent samples; of 42 men who were AR-V7–negative at baseline, 6 (14%) converted to positive status and 36 remained negative. Clinical outcomes of the “converters” were intermediate, better than those who were AR-V7–positive to begin with, but worse than those who remained AR-V7–negative.Dr. Antonarakis pointed out that these results suggest that detection of AR-V7 is associated with both primary and acquired resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone.Further InvestigationWhen asked what other options patients might have who are resistant to these two drugs, he said, “It is possible that the detection of AR-V7 might simply be a poor prognostic factor in the context of multiple therapies. In order to test this hypothesis, our group is currently investigating the role of AR-V7 in the context of docetaxel and cabazitaxel [Jevtana] chemotherapy. It would also be interesting to evaluate the role of AR-V7 in the context of immunotherapies such as sipuleucel-T or radiopharmaceuticals such as radium-223.”He and his co-investigators plan to incorporate their blood-based AR-V7 assay into prospective clinical trials of enzalutamide and abiraterone, as well as into prospective trials of novel agents that may have activity against the AR-V7 splice variant.Disclosure: Dr. Antonarakis is a paid consultant and advisor to Janssen Biotech and Astellas/Medivation. He has received research funding from both companies.[Study also funded by the Prostate Cancer Foundation and others.]~~If this is any indication of things to come in the PCa research pipeline then, hopefully, we will see new & significant breakthroughs in the fight against PCa during our lifetime.0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards