Report projects: big rise in cancer survivors
Report projects: big rise in cancer survivors
“More and more people are surviving cancer, thanks to earlier
detection and better treatment, and a new report out Wednesday
projects the ranks of cancer survivors will grow by nearly a
third over the next 10 years.
That’s the good news. The bad news: these 18 million cancer
survivors are going to cost the health system a lot of money.
“The increase in the number of survivors will be due primarily to
an aging of the population. By 2020, we expect that two-thirds of
cancer survivors are going to be age 65 or older,” says Julia
Rowland of the National Cancer Institute, which conducted the study.”
By Maggie Fox, Senior Writer, NBC News
http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/27/17490379-report-projects-big-rise-in-cancer-survivors?lite
The Scandinavians did a study that indicated that cancer victims aren't actually "living longer", they are just being diagnosed earlier.
Makes one wonder, huh.
Best wishes,
John
Comments
-
Well ... it sounds hopeful to me ... am I missing something?
Is it all the oldsters (like me) that may survive and cost other folks money? -- Cynthia
The most genuine acts of kindness are done without fanfare and when no one is looking.
0 -
If…..They diagnosed me at birth,devotion10 said:Well ... it sounds hopeful to me ... am I missing something?
Is it all the oldsters (like me) that may survive and cost other folks money? -- Cynthia
The most genuine acts of kindness are done without fanfare and when no one is looking.
I’d have lived my entire life surviving cancer, regardless when I died?
Will health insurance premiums go up and life insurance premiums go down?
Will an “at birth” cancer diagnosis nullify any/all insurance coverage forever?
Things to think about while we’re not thinking about cancer?
(Please excuse me, I’m going to go think about something else now….)
Better health wishes to all,
John
0 -
cheaper and better
Medical costs are already collapsing the job markets financially.
However, I am sure that it is technically possible to improve advanced cancer results AND radically decrease the costs. Our experience with biomarkers and generics is quite different than US standard of care. However the US rate of delivered improvements, and various forms of competition, appear strongly inhibited by the regulatory system.
0 -
TIMEtanstaafl said:cheaper and better
Medical costs are already collapsing the job markets financially.
However, I am sure that it is technically possible to improve advanced cancer results AND radically decrease the costs. Our experience with biomarkers and generics is quite different than US standard of care. However the US rate of delivered improvements, and various forms of competition, appear strongly inhibited by the regulatory system.
I don't know if you read TIME magazines cover story on Cancer. I found it interesting and worth sharing
0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 122K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 673 Leukemia
- 794 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 238 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.2K Ovarian Cancer
- 63 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 542 Sarcoma
- 736 Skin Cancer
- 655 Stomach Cancer
- 192 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.9K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards