Why I love Thomas, The Ketogenic Diet hits the headlines, even Mercola at last is promoting it

13»

Comments

  • annalexandria
    annalexandria Member Posts: 2,571 Member

    Ay yup

    trouble at mill...

    well this why I didn't post the original info here, turned into something nasty (yet again) 

    If the study from Harvard/Faber doesn't convince you then fine have your cake and eat it.

    If you are on the fence, research more on sugar/glucose cancer relationship.

    If you are on chemo and your Onc. says 'more calories needed' have them (although I would go for protein shake personally)

    If you believe refined sugar is natural and harmless you are entitled to that belief.

     

    "The study involved 1,011 stage III colon cancer patients who had undergone surgery."

    "They found that participants with the highest dietary levels of glycemic load and carbohydrate intake had an 80 percent increased risk of colon cancer recurrence or death compared with those who had the lowest levels"

    If your wating for your Onc. to confirm the findings above, it will take around 5 years for others to duplicate and publish.

    It's not just one study though there are many more.

     

     

    The funny thing is...

    I don't think a single person on this forum thinks that eating gobs of processed crap is good for you.  From the comments I've read, we all think that having a healthy diet is one of several useful tools in this fight (I believe you used that word, Tony).  I think the argument arises when people say you can "cure" your cancer by not eating sugar (or going on some other diet, ketone or otherwise), or when people discourage newbies from doing what they feel they need to do to get some calories, under incredibly difficult circumstances.  I'm not even sure what the heck we're arguing about, really...sometimes I feel that people just enjoy stirring the pot for the sake of creating conflict.  AA

  • renw
    renw Member Posts: 282 Member

    thanks sander

    for watching the 5 minutes of my precious life i invested to post these is worth, i have helped one friend here.

    ketosis may have some risks, but i got a few troublesome cells.

    i wonder if anyone here will try this diet with me, i would love to share the experiences as we go along on this crazy experiment together that we call life.

    its an invitation and NOT an order or a request even. is an invitation like this allowed here on csn ?

    if i say i want to try ketogenic, the onc will say OK if you must!

    they want be happy but they wont say NO, in their heart they will know you ARE so special, that you want to live more than all their other patients,

    i get VIP treatment from all the doctors because they know i put 1000% effort in this game of survival.

    if anyone asks their onc about ketogenic i would be very curious.

    sander, thanks for taking the time to watch, maybe your example will motivate some others curiousity.

    hugs,

    pete

    keto

    I have been on a ketogenic diet for 2 months now. I did a lot of research into diets and cancer and this one seemed to make the most sense. (I was looking at all the various diets as a biochemist).

    Its the hardest diet I was ever on. It was fine for the first 2 weeks, but eventually eating high fat medium protein and virtually no carbs gets to you.

    I did achieve a significant reduction in glucose levels. During the diet I did achieve stable disease, but no reduction. I was also on folfiri at the time. Basically I don't know whether the stable disease is due to the chemo or the diet. I do have multi drug resistant cancer, so most chemo has not worked well for me. Only way to tell is stop chemo for a month and note growth.

  • renw
    renw Member Posts: 282 Member
    This argument is running in
    This argument is running in parallel on colonchat.net, there its mostly the world vs John. One hand we have John with his personal experience, where sugar did not appear to play part in his remission. John was probably lucky, in that some compound in some herb he was taking had an impact on his specific genotype. TCM so far has not worked for me however. And i believe pete tried it as well with no results.
    Some people have huge response to chemo, for others like me for example, chemo is useless so everyone's cancer is different depending on the mutations.

    John's strong belief in that sugar plays no role in cancer is based on
    1. his personal experience, where he ate sugar as part of his balanced diet and still got NED.
    2. conspiracy theories that the artficial sweetener industry is behind the anti sugar hype
    3. His personal beliefs

    vs. the other side of the camp which claims that sugar/insulin play a major part in cancer growth rates. No one is saying eat no sugar and u will get no cancer or be cured of one. What we are saying is that sugar fuels cancer growth and by reducing or eliminating sugar, cancer growth can be retarded.

    I have asked john to produce some evidence to backup his point of view. He came up with no study that discredited the glucose/sugar and cancer growth link. On the other hand, there are dozens if not hundreds of studies that shows a positive link between glucose/insulin and cancer growth. I am sorry John, but the evidence against glucose is overwhelming. There are also new studies coming out which hint at manipulating the body metabolic systems, as potential cancer treatments. Its all related to glucose availability. Same in the case of Metformin.

    I personally have cut out all sugar and all high gi foods from my diet. I break the diet on chemo days where I pig put on sugary foods for 2 days every 2 weeks. My reasoning here is that folfiri only works during cell division, so I encourage my little mutants to reproduce while 5fu and riinotecan are pulsing though my veins.
  • Dxed
    Dxed Member Posts: 79
    Is it diet or Treatment?

     

     

    I am not sure why the claim is generating such diverse responses. In the video, it is said that “fasting” and this kind of diet was applied to mice and humans, and it was limited to brain cancer (and can treat other cancers). The results were great. He also maintains that he is writing a protocol for a trial at the cancer center at the University of Michigan. That is said, the whole idea is to starve your body to force  it produce ketones (owing to the absence of glucose in the blood stream). One’s body produces ketones to substitute for the needed sugar (glucose). Cancer cells feed on those ketones as they feed on glucose, and die.  The whole claim is to produce those ketones, and they believe that the recommended diet does the trick.

     

    However, everything you take (no matter what your diet is) will be transformed into glucose. Now, it all depends on the level of diet that induces ketone production. Type 1 Diabetics also know how dangerously life-threatening ketones are. Every single one of (type 1) must have visited the ER at least once (twice or more is the norm).

    To me, this treatment is not for a person to try. Of course he can choose this good diet for one’s own well being and general health. But as a treatment of cancer, it has to be under the supervision of a treating doctor. To add the Harvard study on insulin, there seems also a relation between fasting and less insulin secretion and cancer treatment. Reduction of glucose means less insulin secretion, and more ketone production. If they prove the effectiveness of this "fasting" Im sure they can manufacture medical "ketones" and have it at will and proper dose.

     

    Sander

  • manwithnoname
    manwithnoname Member Posts: 402
    Dxed said:

    Is it diet or Treatment?

     

     

    I am not sure why the claim is generating such diverse responses. In the video, it is said that “fasting” and this kind of diet was applied to mice and humans, and it was limited to brain cancer (and can treat other cancers). The results were great. He also maintains that he is writing a protocol for a trial at the cancer center at the University of Michigan. That is said, the whole idea is to starve your body to force  it produce ketones (owing to the absence of glucose in the blood stream). One’s body produces ketones to substitute for the needed sugar (glucose). Cancer cells feed on those ketones as they feed on glucose, and die.  The whole claim is to produce those ketones, and they believe that the recommended diet does the trick.

     

    However, everything you take (no matter what your diet is) will be transformed into glucose. Now, it all depends on the level of diet that induces ketone production. Type 1 Diabetics also know how dangerously life-threatening ketones are. Every single one of (type 1) must have visited the ER at least once (twice or more is the norm).

    To me, this treatment is not for a person to try. Of course he can choose this good diet for one’s own well being and general health. But as a treatment of cancer, it has to be under the supervision of a treating doctor. To add the Harvard study on insulin, there seems also a relation between fasting and less insulin secretion and cancer treatment. Reduction of glucose means less insulin secretion, and more ketone production. If they prove the effectiveness of this "fasting" Im sure they can manufacture medical "ketones" and have it at will and proper dose.

     

    Sander

    well....2DG does that

    "Work on the ketogenic diet as a treatment for epilepsy have investigated the role of glycolysis in the disease. 2-Deoxyglucose has been proposed by Garriga-Canut et al. as a mimic for the ketogenic diet"

  • Kathleen808
    Kathleen808 Member Posts: 2,342 Member
    Hi Pete

    Hi Pete,

    I haven't read the whole post or watched the video yet but just wanted you to know that I am familiar with the ketogenic diet since it is a diet used for some people who have seizures that cannot be controlled any other way.  Our daughter has epilepsy and therefor we have looked into the diet.  Her seizures are controlled with medication but we know that if they ever get out of control the ketogenic diet may be an option for her.

    Stanford University has a link that has a ketogenic diet planner on it.  I have not used it but thought it might be helpful.  http://www.stanford.edu/group/ketodiet/   I am interested to know if somehow a diet that helps some people with uncontrollable siezures can also help in the cancer fight.  Also, I know with the small children who go on this diet, they are monitored very closely as the diet changes the way the body works in some ways (please excuse the unscientific words).

    Be well.

    Aloha,

    Kathleen

  • pete43lost_at_sea
    pete43lost_at_sea Member Posts: 3,900 Member

    Hi Pete

    Hi Pete,

    I haven't read the whole post or watched the video yet but just wanted you to know that I am familiar with the ketogenic diet since it is a diet used for some people who have seizures that cannot be controlled any other way.  Our daughter has epilepsy and therefor we have looked into the diet.  Her seizures are controlled with medication but we know that if they ever get out of control the ketogenic diet may be an option for her.

    Stanford University has a link that has a ketogenic diet planner on it.  I have not used it but thought it might be helpful.  http://www.stanford.edu/group/ketodiet/   I am interested to know if somehow a diet that helps some people with uncontrollable siezures can also help in the cancer fight.  Also, I know with the small children who go on this diet, they are monitored very closely as the diet changes the way the body works in some ways (please excuse the unscientific words).

    Be well.

    Aloha,

    Kathleen

    thanks everyone and kathleen especially

    I wanted to bring the benefits of this diet to the communities attention, I feel it has merit, I am doing it. I was really seeking some support. 

    To the few who watched the video thanks, for those who were constructive and kind thanks, to the others well its the law of kara.

    If you are interested PM me, its to dangerous to reply. I will let this incredibly important post be my last to the community for the time being while I focus on my recurrence and my therapies.

    Maybe some other new explorer will step up and try and share some new ideas. I have not seen many in the last two and half years here. If someone else turns up I wish them a better experience then I have had here, but its all my own fault and I have learnt my lesson.

    My survival instincts are quiet well developed, thats something colorectal cancer. Sorry about using the sheep analogy, sorry for pointing out the failings of conventional oncology. 

    Hugs,

    Pete

    PS I cannot even use the word HUGs, oh well one last time. I hope this ends the sugar discussion. I have read everyones comments, but its to soul destroying and draining for me to answer them.

  • manwithnoname
    manwithnoname Member Posts: 402

    thanks everyone and kathleen especially

    I wanted to bring the benefits of this diet to the communities attention, I feel it has merit, I am doing it. I was really seeking some support. 

    To the few who watched the video thanks, for those who were constructive and kind thanks, to the others well its the law of kara.

    If you are interested PM me, its to dangerous to reply. I will let this incredibly important post be my last to the community for the time being while I focus on my recurrence and my therapies.

    Maybe some other new explorer will step up and try and share some new ideas. I have not seen many in the last two and half years here. If someone else turns up I wish them a better experience then I have had here, but its all my own fault and I have learnt my lesson.

    My survival instincts are quiet well developed, thats something colorectal cancer. Sorry about using the sheep analogy, sorry for pointing out the failings of conventional oncology. 

    Hugs,

    Pete

    PS I cannot even use the word HUGs, oh well one last time. I hope this ends the sugar discussion. I have read everyones comments, but its to soul destroying and draining for me to answer them.

    Ah Pete

    Don't go...sure you ruffled feathers and the 'sheep' thing was bad judgement, but there are people here who have done the same (or worse) and they ain't leaving.

    The sugar discussion is not over because important issues keep coming back up, and it's important at least until we get a definative answer. 

    I left as well and here I am againSealed

  • pete43lost_at_sea
    pete43lost_at_sea Member Posts: 3,900 Member

    Ah Pete

    Don't go...sure you ruffled feathers and the 'sheep' thing was bad judgement, but there are people here who have done the same (or worse) and they ain't leaving.

    The sugar discussion is not over because important issues keep coming back up, and it's important at least until we get a definative answer. 

    I left as well and here I am againSealed

    its just a csn holiday

    I have to learn german for all these conferences.

    I have to knuckle down and meditate and exercise and qigong my **** off as well as have all these wonderful therapies and research.

    something had to give, and the feedback here just made that decision easy.

    when my marker is zero I will be back. meanwhile I will lurk occaisionally, shoot me an email if its something hot.

    Everyday is a battle for survival using gentle holistic therapies.

    hugs,

    Pete

  • luvinlife2
    luvinlife2 Member Posts: 172 Member
    Thanks Pete :)

    I watched the video and did the reading.  My nat onc has been pushing me towards this for some time now.  He is convinced that my cancer cells are particularily insulin sensitive.  I've been on metformin for about a year now.  I must get very serious about this but I have difficulty when I cook for a husband and 3 kids who eat very healthy but have sweet tooths as well.  My problem is the carbs not so much the processed sugar.

    Thank you Kathleen for the link Smile  I think that it's real help for any of us who will be getting down and serious about the diet.  I'm not sure I can but will speak about it further with my nat onc.

    The only beef I have with the video is that I hate it when Dr.'s refer to patients as being expired.  It's so clincial and cold.  We're not parking meters or library cards...we're human beings with souls and feelings.  Why do they say that?  As you can tell, it really bugs me.

  • pete43lost_at_sea
    pete43lost_at_sea Member Posts: 3,900 Member

    Thanks Pete :)

    I watched the video and did the reading.  My nat onc has been pushing me towards this for some time now.  He is convinced that my cancer cells are particularily insulin sensitive.  I've been on metformin for about a year now.  I must get very serious about this but I have difficulty when I cook for a husband and 3 kids who eat very healthy but have sweet tooths as well.  My problem is the carbs not so much the processed sugar.

    Thank you Kathleen for the link Smile  I think that it's real help for any of us who will be getting down and serious about the diet.  I'm not sure I can but will speak about it further with my nat onc.

    The only beef I have with the video is that I hate it when Dr.'s refer to patients as being expired.  It's so clincial and cold.  We're not parking meters or library cards...we're human beings with souls and feelings.  Why do they say that?  As you can tell, it really bugs me.

    oh my god, another kind reply

    I will go away on my csn holiday with a smile. goodluck with ketosis. I will race you there. I pray it works for all those brave enough to try it.

    hugs,

    Pete

  • rlridings
    rlridings Member Posts: 42
    ketosis

    Pete - lost at sea - I am in all the way with the ketosis concept - just started and hope it is going well with you

  • renw
    renw Member Posts: 282 Member
    I wonder if anyone bothered

    I wonder if anyone bothered to buy and read the book that Pete referenced in his original post: Cancer as a Metabolic Disease?

    I did, and after having read the book, I believe that this makes it the single most important post on this forum. The book is not that well written, its repetitive and a little on the technical side, but the theories and the body of evidence it references is overwhealming. After you read it, you will never think of cancer the same way.

    Get the book, read it, then read it again and after that gift it to your oncologist as just maybe it may get him to think a little out of the chemo box.

    Pete said that this book may just save your life. I don't think he's wrong.