Post-nephrectomy annual follow ups?
I'm in a slightly odd situation, doctor-wise. My wife works in an MRI center, and we found the mass on my kidney, as I was being a guinea pig for them to tweak their MRI protocols. The radiologist at her MRI center told me to get it checked out. My brother-in-law is a radiologist, and he said it was likely kidney cancer-- make an appointment with a urologist.
Urologist ordered a CT scan. Confirmed likely kidney cancer, and scheduled surgery. Surgery went well. One followup to urologist to remove the staples, and he advised me to have an annual CT for the next 5 years. Since then, the urologist moved out of state to join another practice, so he is pretty much out of the picture.
This all happened totally outside of my regular doctor. I rarely went to the doctor, anyway.
Last year, the first anniversary of my surgery, I needed an order to get the CT scan, so I went to my doctor for that. CT was clean, nothing of note or interest.
Now as I approach my second anniversary, I'm wondering about the wisdom of subjecting myself to that heavy dose of radiation (CT). Which is the bigger risk-- not finding something, or the radiation itself causing damage/cancer?
At this point, no one will remind me, or schedule a CT, unless I initiate it.
What has everyone else's post-nephrectomy annual (for 5 years) follow up regimen been?
Comments
-
Follow ups...
Hi Rich,
Much depends on the pathology report, size, type, stage, grade, etc. when determining the need and frequency for follow up vs the risk. That said, you would be hard pressed to find anyone with a better pathology than mine from nearly 3yrs ago. I had ct at 6mos, 1yr, 2yr, and will have my 3yr this fall after my doc told me last year that he didn't feel I needed another, but I felt I needed it for peace of mind. There is a member here who had clean scans until the 5th and bingo it came back, then she was clear until year 10 and it came back again. My advice, find a good doctor, go over your case in detail with him/her, and make an informed decision that gives you the most peace of mind, and remember, RCC is a sneaky devil.
Best wishes,
Gary0 -
CT follow-up protocols
Rich, 2 stage reply - a few quick thoughts plus a couple of questions the answers to which will prepare the way for more knowledgeable members here to give you fuller answers.
Being your own advocate and taking charge of your destiny is vital. You've already recognised that, which is why you're here.
The dose of radiation you get from the latest generation of CT scanners is not as heavy as you may be fearing. For a lot of people, the dye used for contrast in the imaging is more of a hazard than the radiation exposure. Many of us here are getting CT with contrast every 6 months, or 3 months (me for instance) and in some cases every 6 weeks or so.
Most of the general guides to KC will give you a good summary. There are many relevant academic articles you could look at, of which this is a not bad one:
http://www.ajronline.org/content/191/4/1220.full
For better advice here, you need to tell us a bit more about yourself. First your path report essentials from your nephrectomy - stage, grade and size of tumour and the RCC sub-type. The other main factors could be your age and your general health and kidney function level.
Some of us here are so antique and/or have such advanced disease that we won't live much longer anyway, so the radiation and contrast risks aren't of much importance. If you're a lot younger, the radiation and contrast risks take more thinking about BUT they are probably well worth it anyway to catch anything nasty that might come along earlier rather than later. Over a 5 year follow-up period you won't be shipping vast quantities of radiation.
So, please give us the information I've mentioned and someone better equipped will be able to give you more authoritaive answers.
PS 2 days ago, someone wrote about her husband:
"He gets a CAT and a bone scan every 12 weeks. He also gets a double study MRI of his spine every 12 weeks since he has mets there. I know when I read the CAT scan reports, they don't seem to mention the bone lesions in as much detail, if at all, as the other two scans he gets."
I guess they're not too much bothered about the risks from the scans! But then his situation is VERY different from yours!0 -
Follow upTexas_wedge said:CT follow-up protocols
Rich, 2 stage reply - a few quick thoughts plus a couple of questions the answers to which will prepare the way for more knowledgeable members here to give you fuller answers.
Being your own advocate and taking charge of your destiny is vital. You've already recognised that, which is why you're here.
The dose of radiation you get from the latest generation of CT scanners is not as heavy as you may be fearing. For a lot of people, the dye used for contrast in the imaging is more of a hazard than the radiation exposure. Many of us here are getting CT with contrast every 6 months, or 3 months (me for instance) and in some cases every 6 weeks or so.
Most of the general guides to KC will give you a good summary. There are many relevant academic articles you could look at, of which this is a not bad one:
http://www.ajronline.org/content/191/4/1220.full
For better advice here, you need to tell us a bit more about yourself. First your path report essentials from your nephrectomy - stage, grade and size of tumour and the RCC sub-type. The other main factors could be your age and your general health and kidney function level.
Some of us here are so antique and/or have such advanced disease that we won't live much longer anyway, so the radiation and contrast risks aren't of much importance. If you're a lot younger, the radiation and contrast risks take more thinking about BUT they are probably well worth it anyway to catch anything nasty that might come along earlier rather than later. Over a 5 year follow-up period you won't be shipping vast quantities of radiation.
So, please give us the information I've mentioned and someone better equipped will be able to give you more authoritaive answers.
PS 2 days ago, someone wrote about her husband:
"He gets a CAT and a bone scan every 12 weeks. He also gets a double study MRI of his spine every 12 weeks since he has mets there. I know when I read the CAT scan reports, they don't seem to mention the bone lesions in as much detail, if at all, as the other two scans he gets."
I guess they're not too much bothered about the risks from the scans! But then his situation is VERY different from yours!
While annual CT for 5 years is within the range of standard you need a doctor to follow up and not a GP. You need a Urologist specialising in Kidney cancer or an Oncologist as they may also follow up with your blood work as well. Perhaps you can get a referral from the Urolgist that left.
Icemantoo0 -
Follow-up protocolsTexas_wedge said:CT follow-up protocols
Rich, 2 stage reply - a few quick thoughts plus a couple of questions the answers to which will prepare the way for more knowledgeable members here to give you fuller answers.
Being your own advocate and taking charge of your destiny is vital. You've already recognised that, which is why you're here.
The dose of radiation you get from the latest generation of CT scanners is not as heavy as you may be fearing. For a lot of people, the dye used for contrast in the imaging is more of a hazard than the radiation exposure. Many of us here are getting CT with contrast every 6 months, or 3 months (me for instance) and in some cases every 6 weeks or so.
Most of the general guides to KC will give you a good summary. There are many relevant academic articles you could look at, of which this is a not bad one:
http://www.ajronline.org/content/191/4/1220.full
For better advice here, you need to tell us a bit more about yourself. First your path report essentials from your nephrectomy - stage, grade and size of tumour and the RCC sub-type. The other main factors could be your age and your general health and kidney function level.
Some of us here are so antique and/or have such advanced disease that we won't live much longer anyway, so the radiation and contrast risks aren't of much importance. If you're a lot younger, the radiation and contrast risks take more thinking about BUT they are probably well worth it anyway to catch anything nasty that might come along earlier rather than later. Over a 5 year follow-up period you won't be shipping vast quantities of radiation.
So, please give us the information I've mentioned and someone better equipped will be able to give you more authoritaive answers.
PS 2 days ago, someone wrote about her husband:
"He gets a CAT and a bone scan every 12 weeks. He also gets a double study MRI of his spine every 12 weeks since he has mets there. I know when I read the CAT scan reports, they don't seem to mention the bone lesions in as much detail, if at all, as the other two scans he gets."
I guess they're not too much bothered about the risks from the scans! But then his situation is VERY different from yours!
Rich,
I'm twelve years out now and still have an annual CT scan, as well as a chest x-ray and comprehensive blood panel. At one point I was worried about the radiation exposure since abdominal CT's give a pretty hefty dose in comparison to other types of x-rays but I've since stopped worrying about it. I figure I've had over 15 CT scans now which raises my cancer risk by an additional 1%... but as my risk for lung cancer or a late recurrence of kidney cancer is much higher than that I will continue to have them. My doc did stop ordering contrast after the five year mark though.
Jim
Stage I, 5cm, right kidney, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, July 2000.0 -
cool....Digger95 said:Follow-up protocols
Rich,
I'm twelve years out now and still have an annual CT scan, as well as a chest x-ray and comprehensive blood panel. At one point I was worried about the radiation exposure since abdominal CT's give a pretty hefty dose in comparison to other types of x-rays but I've since stopped worrying about it. I figure I've had over 15 CT scans now which raises my cancer risk by an additional 1%... but as my risk for lung cancer or a late recurrence of kidney cancer is much higher than that I will continue to have them. My doc did stop ordering contrast after the five year mark though.
Jim
Stage I, 5cm, right kidney, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, July 2000.
I was also a 'Right' 5.0 CC-RCC - July, 2012. I had a FULL.
Stage 1 & all margins were clear as well....you?0 -
Follow-up protocolsDigger95 said:Follow-up protocols
Rich,
I'm twelve years out now and still have an annual CT scan, as well as a chest x-ray and comprehensive blood panel. At one point I was worried about the radiation exposure since abdominal CT's give a pretty hefty dose in comparison to other types of x-rays but I've since stopped worrying about it. I figure I've had over 15 CT scans now which raises my cancer risk by an additional 1%... but as my risk for lung cancer or a late recurrence of kidney cancer is much higher than that I will continue to have them. My doc did stop ordering contrast after the five year mark though.
Jim
Stage I, 5cm, right kidney, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, July 2000.
Rich,
I forgot to say congratulations on your two year anniversary! Feels pretty good doesn't it?
Jim0 -
Thanks for all the replies.Digger95 said:Follow-up protocols
Rich,
I forgot to say congratulations on your two year anniversary! Feels pretty good doesn't it?
Jim
Thanks for all the replies. Lots of good information to consider! Thanks also for the anniversary well wishes!
I should remember the details of the pathology report better than I do. I'll have to dig the report up. I might have that info in a post around here. I benefited from this site in the days before and after my surgery.
What I remember is Renal Cell Carcinoma. Stage I. Took my entire left kidney and adrenal gland. Saw no evidence of spreading beyond the kidney. Don't remember the tumor size. Surgery was hand-assisted laproscopic. Don't recall the subtyping info from the path report, without looking it up.
Even before the urologist moved away, it seemed like he was done with me once I'd recovered from surgery. He had a great reputation, largely because he did many, many nephrectomies. But this also meant that he was something of an assembly line operation. And once you were past his part of the line, so long.
When I asked my GP to order a CT scan for my first anniversary, it was kind of weird.
He was more concerned with my borderline hypertension (140/90). Kind of a whole other story, but I think hypertension is over-diagnosed, over-treated, and over-medicated. Well since then, I have dropped 24 lbs, and I'm just under the line for overweight (5'-6" and 155 lbs). I wasn't terribly overweight by today's standards, but dropping the weight brought my bp down to around 120/80. I also run 5k once or twice a week, and do some weight training. So, long story short, I brought the hypertension down with diet and exercise. I've limited salt intake forever. I really even don't like salty food. But this is all 'take care of the kidney' stuff rather than watching for additional cancer.
As I read the responses, sounds like a CT per year is pretty average for someone in a lower risk (no spreading) scenario. I had not heard that new CT machines gave a lower dose of radiation. That is good to know. I have an image in my mind of a CT scan being a very large dose of radiation.
Thanks, and best wishes to you all!0 -
Forgot to add, I am 56, andRichGtr said:Thanks for all the replies.
Thanks for all the replies. Lots of good information to consider! Thanks also for the anniversary well wishes!
I should remember the details of the pathology report better than I do. I'll have to dig the report up. I might have that info in a post around here. I benefited from this site in the days before and after my surgery.
What I remember is Renal Cell Carcinoma. Stage I. Took my entire left kidney and adrenal gland. Saw no evidence of spreading beyond the kidney. Don't remember the tumor size. Surgery was hand-assisted laproscopic. Don't recall the subtyping info from the path report, without looking it up.
Even before the urologist moved away, it seemed like he was done with me once I'd recovered from surgery. He had a great reputation, largely because he did many, many nephrectomies. But this also meant that he was something of an assembly line operation. And once you were past his part of the line, so long.
When I asked my GP to order a CT scan for my first anniversary, it was kind of weird.
He was more concerned with my borderline hypertension (140/90). Kind of a whole other story, but I think hypertension is over-diagnosed, over-treated, and over-medicated. Well since then, I have dropped 24 lbs, and I'm just under the line for overweight (5'-6" and 155 lbs). I wasn't terribly overweight by today's standards, but dropping the weight brought my bp down to around 120/80. I also run 5k once or twice a week, and do some weight training. So, long story short, I brought the hypertension down with diet and exercise. I've limited salt intake forever. I really even don't like salty food. But this is all 'take care of the kidney' stuff rather than watching for additional cancer.
As I read the responses, sounds like a CT per year is pretty average for someone in a lower risk (no spreading) scenario. I had not heard that new CT machines gave a lower dose of radiation. That is good to know. I have an image in my mind of a CT scan being a very large dose of radiation.
Thanks, and best wishes to you all!
Forgot to add, I am 56, and in very good health. Probably best condition in decades.
Eat healty and exercise.
I work a sedentary office job, and the combination of 'lack of activity' and poor diet had been taking their toll. But I turned the corner on that, and got my blood pressure under control (without meds) in the bargain.0 -
Great article! Thanks.Texas_wedge said:CT follow-up protocols
Rich, 2 stage reply - a few quick thoughts plus a couple of questions the answers to which will prepare the way for more knowledgeable members here to give you fuller answers.
Being your own advocate and taking charge of your destiny is vital. You've already recognised that, which is why you're here.
The dose of radiation you get from the latest generation of CT scanners is not as heavy as you may be fearing. For a lot of people, the dye used for contrast in the imaging is more of a hazard than the radiation exposure. Many of us here are getting CT with contrast every 6 months, or 3 months (me for instance) and in some cases every 6 weeks or so.
Most of the general guides to KC will give you a good summary. There are many relevant academic articles you could look at, of which this is a not bad one:
http://www.ajronline.org/content/191/4/1220.full
For better advice here, you need to tell us a bit more about yourself. First your path report essentials from your nephrectomy - stage, grade and size of tumour and the RCC sub-type. The other main factors could be your age and your general health and kidney function level.
Some of us here are so antique and/or have such advanced disease that we won't live much longer anyway, so the radiation and contrast risks aren't of much importance. If you're a lot younger, the radiation and contrast risks take more thinking about BUT they are probably well worth it anyway to catch anything nasty that might come along earlier rather than later. Over a 5 year follow-up period you won't be shipping vast quantities of radiation.
So, please give us the information I've mentioned and someone better equipped will be able to give you more authoritaive answers.
PS 2 days ago, someone wrote about her husband:
"He gets a CAT and a bone scan every 12 weeks. He also gets a double study MRI of his spine every 12 weeks since he has mets there. I know when I read the CAT scan reports, they don't seem to mention the bone lesions in as much detail, if at all, as the other two scans he gets."
I guess they're not too much bothered about the risks from the scans! But then his situation is VERY different from yours!
Great article! Thanks.0 -
Does everyone have CTs, orRichGtr said:Great article! Thanks.
Great article! Thanks.
Does everyone have CTs, or possibly some other imaging, such as MRI? My wife works in an MRI center, and suggests MRI, as opposed to CT, because of the radiation. You know the saying, "When you have nothing but a hammer, everything looks like a nail."
My initial 'find' was via MRI. But I recall, the Urologist wanted the CT scan to base his diagnosis on.0 -
MRI problemsRichGtr said:Does everyone have CTs, or
Does everyone have CTs, or possibly some other imaging, such as MRI? My wife works in an MRI center, and suggests MRI, as opposed to CT, because of the radiation. You know the saying, "When you have nothing but a hammer, everything looks like a nail."
My initial 'find' was via MRI. But I recall, the Urologist wanted the CT scan to base his diagnosis on.
I think the CT with dye is the first choice for follow up. Then use of ultrasound w/wo chest xray if there had been any mets to an organ higher in the abdomen.
The "problem" with is that you cannot have one if you have metal inside your body. And generally, with any type of nephrectomy there are surgical clips left for sealing blood vessels. Looks like a closed staple out of your desk stapler. Add to that any other metal plates, heart pacemakers, or ortho items. The metal gets hot and reacts to the magnet.
Personally, I'm on alternating CT and US/Xray at 3-6 month intervals.
Donna0 -
CTs orRichGtr said:Does everyone have CTs, or
Does everyone have CTs, or possibly some other imaging, such as MRI? My wife works in an MRI center, and suggests MRI, as opposed to CT, because of the radiation. You know the saying, "When you have nothing but a hammer, everything looks like a nail."
My initial 'find' was via MRI. But I recall, the Urologist wanted the CT scan to base his diagnosis on.
Rich,
I was diagnoised with a CT but my first (6 month) post-op scans ordered by the urologist were MRIs of the abdomin and pelvis and a chest x-ray. I just met with an oncologist on Monday, however, and he wants CTs of the chest, abdomin, and pelvis this time around (one year). He did not think the radiation was anything that the body could not recover from. Likewise, my creatinine level of 1.3 seems ok for CT contrast as well. I am happy that they will be using a more sensitive tool to look for any mets in my lungs. My wallet will be happier with the CT's too.
John0 -
AFAIK I have no metal clips.donna_lee said:MRI problems
I think the CT with dye is the first choice for follow up. Then use of ultrasound w/wo chest xray if there had been any mets to an organ higher in the abdomen.
The "problem" with is that you cannot have one if you have metal inside your body. And generally, with any type of nephrectomy there are surgical clips left for sealing blood vessels. Looks like a closed staple out of your desk stapler. Add to that any other metal plates, heart pacemakers, or ortho items. The metal gets hot and reacts to the magnet.
Personally, I'm on alternating CT and US/Xray at 3-6 month intervals.
Donna
AFAIK I have no metal clips. Never told to not have MRIs, due to metal. This was my only surgery, so no chances other chances for internal metal.
I recall that during my initial diagnosis, the Urologist wanted the CT, with contrast, even though we (incidentally) had MRI of it. Possibly because that was what he was used to working with. Or, perhaps CT is better in that application.0 -
Thanks John! So, you've hadourfriendjohn said:CTs or
Rich,
I was diagnoised with a CT but my first (6 month) post-op scans ordered by the urologist were MRIs of the abdomin and pelvis and a chest x-ray. I just met with an oncologist on Monday, however, and he wants CTs of the chest, abdomin, and pelvis this time around (one year). He did not think the radiation was anything that the body could not recover from. Likewise, my creatinine level of 1.3 seems ok for CT contrast as well. I am happy that they will be using a more sensitive tool to look for any mets in my lungs. My wallet will be happier with the CT's too.
John
Thanks John! So, you've had both CT and MRI ordered. I know MRIs are usually considered a more costly exam. I'm probably due to have my creatinine level checked again.
Best wishes and clean followups to you! Today is my 2nd anniversary.0 -
Congratulations on 2 yearsRichGtr said:Thanks John! So, you've had
Thanks John! So, you've had both CT and MRI ordered. I know MRIs are usually considered a more costly exam. I'm probably due to have my creatinine level checked again.
Best wishes and clean followups to you! Today is my 2nd anniversary.
That's great Rich. My one year anniversary is September 7th. At Kaiser, MRI's are about twice the cost of CT's ($2200 v $1100 for abdominal and pelvis). You are lucky to "have a friend in the MRI business". I hope your scans continue to be cancer free.
John0 -
My doctor's follow-up plan (for now)ourfriendjohn said:Congratulations on 2 years
That's great Rich. My one year anniversary is September 7th. At Kaiser, MRI's are about twice the cost of CT's ($2200 v $1100 for abdominal and pelvis). You are lucky to "have a friend in the MRI business". I hope your scans continue to be cancer free.
John
I had Stage 1, Grade 3 clear cell RCC. Open partial nephrectomy in January 2012 at age 43.
6-month post op: Abdominal Ultrasound + chest x-ray (NED)
1-year post op planned: Abdominal and Chest CT
After 1 year, Doc expects future scans to be mostly ultrasound + chest x-ray.0 -
flank painDigger95 said:Follow-up protocols
Rich,
I'm twelve years out now and still have an annual CT scan, as well as a chest x-ray and comprehensive blood panel. At one point I was worried about the radiation exposure since abdominal CT's give a pretty hefty dose in comparison to other types of x-rays but I've since stopped worrying about it. I figure I've had over 15 CT scans now which raises my cancer risk by an additional 1%... but as my risk for lung cancer or a late recurrence of kidney cancer is much higher than that I will continue to have them. My doc did stop ordering contrast after the five year mark though.
Jim
Stage I, 5cm, right kidney, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, July 2000.
Hi Jim,
I also am 12 years out from a left kidney laproscopic nephrectomy (RCC). surgery was christmas of 2000. I have had periodic pain where the kidney was since the surgery, mainly after very vigorous activity, but it has been increasing over the past couple of months and it does not take much activity to set it off. Kinda a dull ache that I can not get away from in any position, sitting, standing or lying down.
Of coarse I am concerned that the sneaky rcc is trying to return and I have a scan on the books for the 18th of this month. It will be my first scan in 5 yrs as my doctor said I have nothing to worry about. Well I am worried and I am wondering if you ever experience pain in your flank area after physical activity.
I also was stage 1-2 with a 4 cm encapsulated tumor, clear margins. 43 years old (now).
I have always been fairly thin, but recently lost about 15 lbs by cutting out the junk in my diet.
I am hoping this somehow is the source of my increase in pain. My febal little non-doctor mind is thinking that the surgical clips are digging into some nerves/interior flesh and causing this soreness at the end of the day.
Please let me know your thought when you have time and congrats on being a long term survivor,,, lets keep on keepin on !!!!
Thanks0 -
flank painjason n said:flank pain
Hi Jim,
I also am 12 years out from a left kidney laproscopic nephrectomy (RCC). surgery was christmas of 2000. I have had periodic pain where the kidney was since the surgery, mainly after very vigorous activity, but it has been increasing over the past couple of months and it does not take much activity to set it off. Kinda a dull ache that I can not get away from in any position, sitting, standing or lying down.
Of coarse I am concerned that the sneaky rcc is trying to return and I have a scan on the books for the 18th of this month. It will be my first scan in 5 yrs as my doctor said I have nothing to worry about. Well I am worried and I am wondering if you ever experience pain in your flank area after physical activity.
I also was stage 1-2 with a 4 cm encapsulated tumor, clear margins. 43 years old (now).
I have always been fairly thin, but recently lost about 15 lbs by cutting out the junk in my diet.
I am hoping this somehow is the source of my increase in pain. My febal little non-doctor mind is thinking that the surgical clips are digging into some nerves/interior flesh and causing this soreness at the end of the day.
Please let me know your thought when you have time and congrats on being a long term survivor,,, lets keep on keepin on !!!!
Thanks
Jason,
I apologize for not seeing your message sooner but I haven't been on the forum for a few days. I see that you started a separate thread with your question and hope that you get the advice and reassurance that you need.
Jim0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.9K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 794 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 63 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 540 Sarcoma
- 734 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.9K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards