Tumor located in the 'collective area' of the kidney & PNX nodes....
As I've been continuing to educate myself & learning as much as I can from all of you, as well as, reading, etc, I've come across some very limited information regarding tumors that were located in the 'collective area' of the kidney. Mine was partly in this area & the research, although, very limited, says these are much more aggressive. Does this negate my great path report in some way?
Additionally, I've come to find out that my nodes were not taken out & biopsied (sp). PNX was the code. this frightens the heck out of me.
I'm dealing with post-surgical stress anyway now that my new reality & I have to live with the ( every 3 months mystery ) waiting, which I know most you also live with. So to add this to the mix isn't as comforting as what I felt a few weeks ago thinking I was more than likely done with this dreaded disease & had won the lottery.
If anyone knows of a Dr that may have some expertise in either of these areas I could speak with it would be greatly appreciated. My Dr doesn't have the best bed side manner, although he is a good surgeon that seems to have did a good job with my Neph.
Thanks.
Comments
-
Prognosis
adman, are you referring to collecting duct carcinoma? I'd think it unlikely that if that is what you had you would have been classed as stage 1; but you ought to ask your docs about that - maybe send a short email question since that often leads to a speedy response.
Which particular lymph nodes are you thinking about? There's a large number. Leaving aside the first question, your very early stage and grade probably make it so unlikely that you'll have any compromised nodes that there would have been no need to investigate. They wouldn't have even dreamt of biopsy or excision - completely uncalled-for, I would think.
[For whatever comfort it may give you, I'm about to have a fourth CT scan with contrast and the main focus (unless something else turns up!) will be on enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes - roughly in the region my kidney was in. My path report showed NxMx and the experts saw no reason for investigating the nodes, even with 9cm. stage 4, grade 4, necrotic, sarcomatoid etc. I'll let you know what is found in a few weeks time. If I suddenly disappear off the radar, all bets are off and you're on your own - apart, that is, from all the good folks you're getting to know here and on ACOR! However, I'm hopeful I'm not about to move into s4 g4 T4 N2/ M1 where my prognosis would be a trifle more daunting than yours.]0 -
collective duct....Texas_wedge said:Prognosis
adman, are you referring to collecting duct carcinoma? I'd think it unlikely that if that is what you had you would have been classed as stage 1; but you ought to ask your docs about that - maybe send a short email question since that often leads to a speedy response.
Which particular lymph nodes are you thinking about? There's a large number. Leaving aside the first question, your very early stage and grade probably make it so unlikely that you'll have any compromised nodes that there would have been no need to investigate. They wouldn't have even dreamt of biopsy or excision - completely uncalled-for, I would think.
[For whatever comfort it may give you, I'm about to have a fourth CT scan with contrast and the main focus (unless something else turns up!) will be on enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes - roughly in the region my kidney was in. My path report showed NxMx and the experts saw no reason for investigating the nodes, even with 9cm. stage 4, grade 4, necrotic, sarcomatoid etc. I'll let you know what is found in a few weeks time. If I suddenly disappear off the radar, all bets are off and you're on your own - apart, that is, from all the good folks you're getting to know here and on ACOR! However, I'm hopeful I'm not about to move into s4 g4 T4 N2/ M1 where my prognosis would be a trifle more daunting than yours.]
by being located in the 'collective' area, does that automatically make it 'collective duct' carcinoma?
Mine was listed on the path report as 'Clear Cell-Renal Cell Carcinoma', but no Sarcomatoid feature was listed, if that means anything.0 -
Collecting ductadman said:collective duct....
by being located in the 'collective' area, does that automatically make it 'collective duct' carcinoma?
Mine was listed on the path report as 'Clear Cell-Renal Cell Carcinoma', but no Sarcomatoid feature was listed, if that means anything.
Please note spelling, adman! (I haven't heard the expression "collective area" so can't help clarify that. You'll need to ask your docs for more information.)
Can you maybe put up more of your path report here? No sarcomatoid is good news - sarcomatoid change is not what anyone would choose to have.0 -
path report.....Texas_wedge said:Collecting duct
Please note spelling, adman! (I haven't heard the expression "collective area" so can't help clarify that. You'll need to ask your docs for more information.)
Can you maybe put up more of your path report here? No sarcomatoid is good news - sarcomatoid change is not what anyone would choose to have.
Mr. Wedge,
Thank you for your valuable input and insight.
SPECIMEN(S)
(A) KIDNEY, TOTAL NEPHRECTOMY, RIGHT ADRENAL GLAND AND URETER
DIAGNOSIS:
Right Radical Nephrectomy and Ureter -
- Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ( Conventional Cell Carcinoma )
- This is a Fuhrman nuclear Grade 1
- The carcinoma measures 5.0cm in diameter
- No extension beyond the kidney is seen
- The surgical margins of excision including the distal ureteral margin and the vascualr margins are free of malignancy.
- A portion of adreneal gland is also included and it is free of malignancy
- A cystic portion appears to be a resolving area of hematoma
Cancer Case Summary:
Procedure: Radical Nephrectomy
Specimen laterality Right
Tumor Size: 5.0 x 5.0 x 5.0 cm
Tumor focality Unifocal
Macroscopic extent of tumor Tumor limited to kidney
Histologic type Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Sarcomatoid feature Not identified
Histologic grade Fuhrman nuclear grade 1
Microscopic tumor extension Tumor limited to the kidney
MARGINS Gerota's fascial margin: clear
Renal vein margin: clear
Ureteral margin: clear
Renal artery margin: clear
Lymphovascular Invasion: Not identified
Pathologic Staging:
Primary Tumor:
pT1: Tumor 7.0 cm or less in greater dimension, limited to the kidney
Regional Lymph Nodes:
pNX; regional nodes cannot be assessed0 -
path reportadman said:path report.....
Mr. Wedge,
Thank you for your valuable input and insight.
SPECIMEN(S)
(A) KIDNEY, TOTAL NEPHRECTOMY, RIGHT ADRENAL GLAND AND URETER
DIAGNOSIS:
Right Radical Nephrectomy and Ureter -
- Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ( Conventional Cell Carcinoma )
- This is a Fuhrman nuclear Grade 1
- The carcinoma measures 5.0cm in diameter
- No extension beyond the kidney is seen
- The surgical margins of excision including the distal ureteral margin and the vascualr margins are free of malignancy.
- A portion of adreneal gland is also included and it is free of malignancy
- A cystic portion appears to be a resolving area of hematoma
Cancer Case Summary:
Procedure: Radical Nephrectomy
Specimen laterality Right
Tumor Size: 5.0 x 5.0 x 5.0 cm
Tumor focality Unifocal
Macroscopic extent of tumor Tumor limited to kidney
Histologic type Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Sarcomatoid feature Not identified
Histologic grade Fuhrman nuclear grade 1
Microscopic tumor extension Tumor limited to the kidney
MARGINS Gerota's fascial margin: clear
Renal vein margin: clear
Ureteral margin: clear
Renal artery margin: clear
Lymphovascular Invasion: Not identified
Pathologic Staging:
Primary Tumor:
pT1: Tumor 7.0 cm or less in greater dimension, limited to the kidney
Regional Lymph Nodes:
pNX; regional nodes cannot be assessed
M, you're laughing! I can't see any reference to "collective area" or any similar phrase in your path. report. You HAD a conventional clear cell tumour (so not collecting duct carcinoma)and it's all gone. You'll be routinely followed up but in your shoes I'd be packing up my bags and hiking out of here and KIDNEY-ONC, to get on with my life.0 -
thanks....Texas_wedge said:path report
M, you're laughing! I can't see any reference to "collective area" or any similar phrase in your path. report. You HAD a conventional clear cell tumour (so not collecting duct carcinoma)and it's all gone. You'll be routinely followed up but in your shoes I'd be packing up my bags and hiking out of here and KIDNEY-ONC, to get on with my life.
This is a part of my education to best understand what I have and how to best follow up in future. These Dr's don't take the time to explain ****, IMHO, all they tell you in "You're ok, you'll be fine", so if you have question due to ambiguity about information you've heard or read, forget it.
I appreciate your feedback. I realize I'm very lucky but want to be able to say that 15,20, 30 years from now, as well.
Your understanding is appreciated.0 -
thanksadman said:thanks....
This is a part of my education to best understand what I have and how to best follow up in future. These Dr's don't take the time to explain ****, IMHO, all they tell you in "You're ok, you'll be fine", so if you have question due to ambiguity about information you've heard or read, forget it.
I appreciate your feedback. I realize I'm very lucky but want to be able to say that 15,20, 30 years from now, as well.
Your understanding is appreciated.
You're very welcome. I do understand and I hope to be around to hear you say it!0 -
Don't Worry, Be HappyTexas_wedge said:thanks
You're very welcome. I do understand and I hope to be around to hear you say it!
That's the name of the song. You have a great pathology. Have your regular follow up reports and move on.
The nodes you were concerned about in one of your first reports....Generally, if it appears the primary tumor has not grown beyond the Gerota facia (the sack the kidney/adrenal are in) and the removal leaves clean margins, the surgeon does not remove the para-caval lymph nodes. This is a set of nodes, 10 or 11, that are directly under the kidney.
Yes, you have a good path rept.
Donna0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.9K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 794 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 63 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 540 Sarcoma
- 734 Skin Cancer
- 654 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.9K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards