Mdx/ sutent trial
Comments
-
MDXHanno said:Wow sounds like there could
Wow sounds like there could be some mild anticipation there Fantastic that you can finally commence the trial... wishing you a safe and successful venture. Mel
tacycarts, that's exciting news. Good luck!
The big message here is the trial for you. But I see another big message. I had been the only one here who posted about being on MDX. I'm no longer alone. That means the drug is being offered to more people. And we hope it is because MDX is going to prove to be a magic bullet in our fight against renal cancer. I love explaining to people how this drug works. I find it fascinating.0 -
Hopefoxhd said:MDX
tacycarts, that's exciting news. Good luck!
The big message here is the trial for you. But I see another big message. I had been the only one here who posted about being on MDX. I'm no longer alone. That means the drug is being offered to more people. And we hope it is because MDX is going to prove to be a magic bullet in our fight against renal cancer. I love explaining to people how this drug works. I find it fascinating.
This drug has given me hope in this nasty renal cancer battle. For months I have been searching for your positive posts fox, and now johns. I certainly appreciate the hopeful vibe that it puts in my mind and am waiting for your next scan results.0 -
MDX-1106 (now BMS936558)foxhd said:MDX
tacycarts, that's exciting news. Good luck!
The big message here is the trial for you. But I see another big message. I had been the only one here who posted about being on MDX. I'm no longer alone. That means the drug is being offered to more people. And we hope it is because MDX is going to prove to be a magic bullet in our fight against renal cancer. I love explaining to people how this drug works. I find it fascinating.
It's sounded good from the very outset - people on it have been enthusiastic for almost 3 years now. For instance, on KIDNEY-ONC it was getting good initial indications from patients in the Stage 1b trial back in November 2009. By now they doubtless have the posology down to a fine art so that results will be getting ever better and better.
An interim appraisal from ASCO looked good back in 2010
http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/Meetings/Abstracts?&vmview=abst_detail_view&confID=74&abstractID=49563
I recall you've indicated, Fox, that there may be expedited FDA approval because it's showing such superb results. Any more news on that?0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.9K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 794 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 63 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 540 Sarcoma
- 734 Skin Cancer
- 654 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.9K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards