Lost biopsy
I have been following posts and I hope everyone in treatment is feeling as good as can be expected. Feel like I know a few of you now even though we have not met. Kind thoughts to everyone, Georgia
Comments
-
WOW! What a mess,dear!
WOW! What a mess,dear! There must be some tissue somewhere or a blood test. If you suspect it's cancer(due to Lynch) Three years is three years too many! I have never heard of that many mistakes in one test! Get the test do ASAP,,,there maybe cells floating around the could do a wash and test. Wishing you the best with everthing including kicking tail about this! debrajo0 -
I have Lynch Syndrome.
I have Lynch Syndrome. Everything I have read says a max of 2 years between colonoscopies. If you are over 40, they should be yearly.
I wouldn't wait on another one. I have my first one in May and I'm sure they are no fun. I am so sorry you have had this experience.0 -
GeorgiaShell bug said:I have Lynch Syndrome.
I have Lynch Syndrome. Everything I have read says a max of 2 years between colonoscopies. If you are over 40, they should be yearly.
I wouldn't wait on another one. I have my first one in May and I'm sure they are no fun. I am so sorry you have had this experience.
I'm sorry about this situation. It is nerve racking and pretty hard to believe that they could lose such a thing. Are they looking for your tissue or just giving up?
But my question is - if we are getting good surveillance of our uterine cancer with scans and bloodwork, wouldn't any cancer elsewhere in the body show up in the scans? Or do colonoscopies pick up problems sooner?
I have a family hx of colon cancer so I am concerned. I just had colonoscopy done (neg). I asked both my gyn-onc and gastroenterologist about connection between uterine and colon cancer and they both minimized it. I thought that was odd because of the Lynch Syndrome thing. I don't know if it makes any sense to get genetic testing at this point or just get another colonoscopy in a couple of years.
Sorry again, Georgia. Mary Ann0 -
Thank you Rachelle, Debrajo and Mary Anndaisy366 said:Georgia
I'm sorry about this situation. It is nerve racking and pretty hard to believe that they could lose such a thing. Are they looking for your tissue or just giving up?
But my question is - if we are getting good surveillance of our uterine cancer with scans and bloodwork, wouldn't any cancer elsewhere in the body show up in the scans? Or do colonoscopies pick up problems sooner?
I have a family hx of colon cancer so I am concerned. I just had colonoscopy done (neg). I asked both my gyn-onc and gastroenterologist about connection between uterine and colon cancer and they both minimized it. I thought that was odd because of the Lynch Syndrome thing. I don't know if it makes any sense to get genetic testing at this point or just get another colonoscopy in a couple of years.
Sorry again, Georgia. Mary Ann
I am so grateful to be able to talk about this stuff here. No-one at home would really get it. I haven't been diagnosed with Lynch syndrome, my gastro just raised it as something to investigate due to my new symptoms. This is why I am so disappointed that biopsy was lost. Have done some research yesterday and today and have found studies that recommend Lynch syndrome testing of endometrial cancer biopsy tissue, so this is what I am focussing on now. My gyn/onc appt is four weeks away. She referred me to the gastro so she has some involvement in the outcome. If I did have Lynch syndrome then I think I would go back to gastro for further discussions about colonoscopy sooner than three years.
What happened was that the nurse in endoscopy missed the container when she was transferring specimen. She said she thought it had gone into container when it had not. It would have gone out in waste disposal of materials following my procedure. The endoscopy unit is dimmed so surgeon can view tv monitor while scoping. They have done an incident report on what happened and will make a spotlight available in future for the assistant so they can see what they are doing. This does not help me however.
Mary Ann if you have a family history of colon cancer, they could maybe do tissue testing from your uterine surgery. I think genetic testing takes quite a while, but it can be done in addition to regular colonoscopy. There was some comment about this recently when Rachelle and some of the others were discussing Lynch syndrome networking. I think the scans and monitoring of uterine recurrence is as good as it can be. Tumours have to be a certain size before they can be detected as others have mentioned. Thank you again for comments and support. Loving thoughts to you, Georgia0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards