Endometrial with clear cell features
Heather
Comments
-
Heather
I certainly can relate to your sister's fear and shock.
Recently I discussed my own fears with my doc - that I was headed for decline. He succeeded in helping by making the following 2 points - not all "like" cancers behave in the same way and we could die in a traffic accident any day (not all that reassuring perhaps).
But his point was that none of us really knows what will happen and that we should strive to live each day to the fullest - doing good works along the way.
One thing that helped me early on was when I made a CONSCIOUS DECISION that I would not BE DEFINED BY CANCER.
I wish your sister well. She is very fortunate to have you for a sister.
God bless, Mary Ann0 -
Clear cell cancerdaisy366 said:Heather
I certainly can relate to your sister's fear and shock.
Recently I discussed my own fears with my doc - that I was headed for decline. He succeeded in helping by making the following 2 points - not all "like" cancers behave in the same way and we could die in a traffic accident any day (not all that reassuring perhaps).
But his point was that none of us really knows what will happen and that we should strive to live each day to the fullest - doing good works along the way.
One thing that helped me early on was when I made a CONSCIOUS DECISION that I would not BE DEFINED BY CANCER.
I wish your sister well. She is very fortunate to have you for a sister.
God bless, Mary Ann
My understanding of clear cell cancer is that there is often a lower response rate to first line chemo than there is with the other kinds of gynecological cancers. Kidney cancer is often the clear cell type. The chemo for that is called temsirolimus (Torisel).
There is a clinical trial going on for solid tumors using temsirolimus & another drug that inhibits cancer by stopping its ability to create new blood vessels. The reason I am telling you this is just to let you know that the researchers are working on new combinations of anti-cancer treatments. Meanwhile, all the oncologist will do is something called "standard of care" which you HOPE is gonna put her into remission.
Because this type of cancer is so rarely found in gyn cancers, there usually isn't any research done on the best treatment for clear cell endometrial or ovarian cancer. So (this is just my opinion), the doc probably wants to go "one step more than usual" just to have a better chance of getting your sister into remission.
Your sister is probably still in shock from her diagnosis. She's gonna have to trust the doctor because he or she is the expert here. If I were you, I wouldn't even tell your sister what I said about clear cell cancer--it isn't gonna help her to think any other way than hopeful. I'm not an oncologist, I'm just guessing why the oncologist wants to be more aggressive with your sister's treatment.
I know an ovarian cancer survivor who was diagnosed with clear cell cancer. After two years of trying just about EVERY possible chemo combination without getting into remission, her doctor prescribed temsirolimus (which the insurance did approve even though it was considered to be an "off label use" since it is not officially approved for ovarian cancer). The last time I checked in with her, the chemo was working.
Sorry for the long post. There is so much to learn about cancer & cancer treatments & staying alive while waiting for better treatments to come along.
Best wishes to you & your sister.0 -
Minimizing side effectscarolenk said:Clear cell cancer
My understanding of clear cell cancer is that there is often a lower response rate to first line chemo than there is with the other kinds of gynecological cancers. Kidney cancer is often the clear cell type. The chemo for that is called temsirolimus (Torisel).
There is a clinical trial going on for solid tumors using temsirolimus & another drug that inhibits cancer by stopping its ability to create new blood vessels. The reason I am telling you this is just to let you know that the researchers are working on new combinations of anti-cancer treatments. Meanwhile, all the oncologist will do is something called "standard of care" which you HOPE is gonna put her into remission.
Because this type of cancer is so rarely found in gyn cancers, there usually isn't any research done on the best treatment for clear cell endometrial or ovarian cancer. So (this is just my opinion), the doc probably wants to go "one step more than usual" just to have a better chance of getting your sister into remission.
Your sister is probably still in shock from her diagnosis. She's gonna have to trust the doctor because he or she is the expert here. If I were you, I wouldn't even tell your sister what I said about clear cell cancer--it isn't gonna help her to think any other way than hopeful. I'm not an oncologist, I'm just guessing why the oncologist wants to be more aggressive with your sister's treatment.
I know an ovarian cancer survivor who was diagnosed with clear cell cancer. After two years of trying just about EVERY possible chemo combination without getting into remission, her doctor prescribed temsirolimus (which the insurance did approve even though it was considered to be an "off label use" since it is not officially approved for ovarian cancer). The last time I checked in with her, the chemo was working.
Sorry for the long post. There is so much to learn about cancer & cancer treatments & staying alive while waiting for better treatments to come along.
Best wishes to you & your sister.
As if I hadn't already said enough: there are some members on this site who know how to minimize the side effects of pelvic radiation.
If you look at some of the older postings, there is a LOT of really good info on natural support therapies that your sister should consider using.
I'm done now.0 -
this site....
If you search this site, especially the older uterine posts, you will find tons of information that could be helpful to your sister. I can't speak to the type of cancer your sister has, but I can say that I just finished 25 rounds of internal radiation and have really had very little noticeable side effects. That doesn't mean my insides aren't mush, but so far, so good. I think they've come a long way in terms of radiation and if you have a skilled oncologist radiologist, the long term effects can be kept to a minimum, but of course everyone is different. Obviously she needs to do what she feels comfortable with and I wish her the best.
Take care,
Cindy0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards