BRAC Analysis Insurance Trouble
Mother ~ DX Metastic Kidney Cancer 41 (died within 4 mo)
Maternal Grandfather ~ DX Parotid Gland Cancer 61 (died within a year)
Maternal Grandmother ~ DX Lung Cancer 69 (early stages, radiation and living, now 76)
Paternal Grandmother ~ DX 49 Breast Cancer (early stages, masectomy only treatment, affected breast only caught early, still living and 80)
Father and Paternal grandfather have Vascular / Heart Disease issues....
Tons of extended family with all different types of Cancer.
Comments
-
BRAC testing
Hello, I was also denied twice by my insurance company for BRAC testing, even thou my mother had breast cancer, and I've had it twice and a mastectomy. They said I didn't meet their requirements because I would need two relatives with breast cancer, and my mother was diagnosed at age 69, if she was diagnosed earlier then I might qualify. I could pay for it myself, which would have cost over $500.00, and I just didn't have the money, with all the medical bills I had. Insurance companys will drive you crazy.0 -
So sorrylinny b said:BRAC testing
Hello, I was also denied twice by my insurance company for BRAC testing, even thou my mother had breast cancer, and I've had it twice and a mastectomy. They said I didn't meet their requirements because I would need two relatives with breast cancer, and my mother was diagnosed at age 69, if she was diagnosed earlier then I might qualify. I could pay for it myself, which would have cost over $500.00, and I just didn't have the money, with all the medical bills I had. Insurance companys will drive you crazy.
You would think that your mom having it alone would qualify someone....personally I think that everyone should be allowed this regardless of their family history or age. Look at all the women with BC who have NO family history, or are diagnosed with BC in their 20's or 30's. There are no rules when it comes to cancer. My mom had Stage 4 Metastatic Kidney cancer at 41! With no kidney cancer symptoms. From what I have read that is something for men and in their 60's if you go by the guidelines.0 -
Typically to consider cancer
Typically to consider cancer to be genetic they look for diagnosis prior to 50. It is really tough to get the insurance to cover the test because of the cost. I had the testing and it came back negative even with 3 generations so it wasn't really any help for my kids.
If you do not have cancer and no one in your family has tested positive, they typically will not do the test. I forget exactly why. The genetic councilor explained it but I was still going through chemo and my brain was a little addled. Since I tested negative they will not test my sister even though she has 2 sisters with BC one at 30 and one at 47. Having the gene would only increase my sisters risk slightly over the strong family history anyway.
Cindy0 -
The genetics counselor I saw
The genetics counselor I saw explained that one company currently holds the patent on the test. I think she said the patent is due to expire in 2012. She thought that once that happens the test will become more widely available, less expensive, and shorter response times.
She also explained that if you test positive, it's no guarantee that you will get cancer. If you test negative it's no guarantee that you won't get cancer. In fact, there are many here with strong family connections to breast cancer who got negative results for BCRA. There are likely other unidentified genetic factors that contribute to the incidence of cancer. (They made me take a class on all this stuff before they would let me do the test.)
So, in my opinion, regular testing like mammos and pap smears are more important in a proactive approach to cancer than genetic testing. And monthly self exams that include a visual exam are critical.
After a diagnosis of bc or ovarian cancer, the BCRA test becomes more valuable...again, my opinion.
Hugs,
Linda0 -
Thanks for the information.Gabe N Abby Mom said:The genetics counselor I saw
The genetics counselor I saw explained that one company currently holds the patent on the test. I think she said the patent is due to expire in 2012. She thought that once that happens the test will become more widely available, less expensive, and shorter response times.
She also explained that if you test positive, it's no guarantee that you will get cancer. If you test negative it's no guarantee that you won't get cancer. In fact, there are many here with strong family connections to breast cancer who got negative results for BCRA. There are likely other unidentified genetic factors that contribute to the incidence of cancer. (They made me take a class on all this stuff before they would let me do the test.)
So, in my opinion, regular testing like mammos and pap smears are more important in a proactive approach to cancer than genetic testing. And monthly self exams that include a visual exam are critical.
After a diagnosis of bc or ovarian cancer, the BCRA test becomes more valuable...again, my opinion.
Hugs,
Linda
Thanks for the information. I am a little in the dark with regards to the BCRA test. I know I was tested and it came back negative. My Onc. said the reason I was tested was because I was under the age of 50 and there had been no family history of breast cancer. I am not sure I get the connection and wasn't in a place at that time to ask questions.
Nether the less my 12 year old daughter was relieved, not that it means she won't get it but I guess me not having the gene is one less thing to be concerned about. Sad what our young daughters have to go through when we as mother's have breast cancer.0 -
If you can tell them that
If you can tell them that you have Ashkenazi Jewish ancestors, they may be able to approve the testing. For my wife, I basically told them that we weren't sure of the heritage, and they may have been Jewish. This was a fact that I found out doing her family tree. That along with an aunt who passed from breast cancer was enough for them to approve the test.
It's nice to hear that your grandmother is a 31 year survivor!!!0 -
United Health CareHubby said:If you can tell them that
If you can tell them that you have Ashkenazi Jewish ancestors, they may be able to approve the testing. For my wife, I basically told them that we weren't sure of the heritage, and they may have been Jewish. This was a fact that I found out doing her family tree. That along with an aunt who passed from breast cancer was enough for them to approve the test.
It's nice to hear that your grandmother is a 31 year survivor!!!
I have United Health Care and they covered my BRAC test. My maternal grandmother and aunt both had BC, my brother had brain cancer (all are healthy now). My aunt was diagnosed before age 50 which I think might have had something to do with it.
Good luck!
Hugs, Debi0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 122K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 673 Leukemia
- 794 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 238 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.2K Ovarian Cancer
- 63 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 542 Sarcoma
- 736 Skin Cancer
- 656 Stomach Cancer
- 192 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.9K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards