Pet Scan Results
Linda
Comments
-
Very Common
If you've kept up on the many posts concerning this...
It's very common, especially with first PET scans and when perfomed in less than six months to have residual show up...
As for the area you mention, I'd presume that it would not be related to the original cancer he is being treated for...
This is usually looked at as a base PET, all others will be used in comparison to this one.
So actually from what you describe, it sounds pretty good really. The original cancer they treated him for basically are now showing as no evidense of disease.
Out of curiousity, why don't they do a biopsy to the area on his face.
Best,
John0 -
Dont KnowSkiffin16 said:Very Common
If you've kept up on the many posts concerning this...
It's very common, especially with first PET scans and when perfomed in less than six months to have residual show up...
As for the area you mention, I'd presume that it would not be related to the original cancer he is being treated for...
This is usually looked at as a base PET, all others will be used in comparison to this one.
So actually from what you describe, it sounds pretty good really. The original cancer they treated him for basically are now showing as no evidense of disease.
Out of curiousity, why don't they do a biopsy to the area on his face.
Best,
John
We don't know why, like I said ENT and Chemo Doc, thinks this is a false reading, I did not know pets do that. We are holding on to the good news of the rest of the results. I know that they quit rads on his face early saying that they didn't need to do it anymore, so I am thinking its just residual like you said, will keep everyone posted, thanks for the support.
Linda0 -
I am surprised you weren'telwoodsinoakdale said:Dont Know
We don't know why, like I said ENT and Chemo Doc, thinks this is a false reading, I did not know pets do that. We are holding on to the good news of the rest of the results. I know that they quit rads on his face early saying that they didn't need to do it anymore, so I am thinking its just residual like you said, will keep everyone posted, thanks for the support.
Linda
I am surprised you weren't aware of this, as my radiologist oncologist made that very clear to me. (actually he decided in my case that the risk of more pet scans constantly, was greater than any benefit, so I've not had a pet since rads). Also, we have members here constantly posting with false positives.
Hope it's just a false positive in your case.0 -
Get them all the time
For the last 6 years my PET scans always light up and area or two that makes the doctors a little concerned. So they go to scoping my nasal passageway looking but only finding little area of inflammation, so far no tumor or anything to really say that C is back.
Take care
Hondo0 -
I agreeHondo said:Get them all the time
For the last 6 years my PET scans always light up and area or two that makes the doctors a little concerned. So they go to scoping my nasal passageway looking but only finding little area of inflammation, so far no tumor or anything to really say that C is back.
Take care
Hondo
I feel in my heart that the cancer they said was in his face, was never there. Ent & Chemo doc believe the same thing, but the rad doc treated it just to be safe. Now it shows up on pet scan, well it never showed up on cat scan before, so I wonder why they want to do a cat scan now..I am just holding on to the good news of no cancer in tonsil or node or body... this is my happiness.
Thanks for the support, it makes life a little easier
Linda0 -
Congrats!!! Great news..elwoodsinoakdale said:I agree
I feel in my heart that the cancer they said was in his face, was never there. Ent & Chemo doc believe the same thing, but the rad doc treated it just to be safe. Now it shows up on pet scan, well it never showed up on cat scan before, so I wonder why they want to do a cat scan now..I am just holding on to the good news of no cancer in tonsil or node or body... this is my happiness.
Thanks for the support, it makes life a little easier
Linda
Congrats!!! Great news..0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards