I could cry a river
the doctors office today saying that I need to schedule a CT scan because my CA-125 is up to 46. I
guess I am platinum resistant. I wonder what lies ahead. I sure was hoping it could have lasted longer til I had to start this crap all over again.
Comments
-
CA-125 is not just an
CA-125 is not just an ovarian cancer marker. It is also an indication of inflammation. I know it is alarming for it to go up (I freaked when mine went up a few points, and at a different lab,) but the CT scan should settle the matter. What was your CA-125 previously? My gyn/onc does not regard it as so significant, but admitted that "everyone wants to know" the number. I hope the scan shows you are NED.0 -
Yes, I had the debulkinganicca said:CA-125 is not just an
CA-125 is not just an ovarian cancer marker. It is also an indication of inflammation. I know it is alarming for it to go up (I freaked when mine went up a few points, and at a different lab,) but the CT scan should settle the matter. What was your CA-125 previously? My gyn/onc does not regard it as so significant, but admitted that "everyone wants to know" the number. I hope the scan shows you are NED.
Yes, I had the debulking surgery in Oct. by Jan my Ca-125 was 7.0 -
Why not get a PET/CT scan?VickiReed said:Yes, I had the debulking
Yes, I had the debulking surgery in Oct. by Jan my Ca-125 was 7.
Whoa, what disappointing news!
If I were in your shoes, I would insist on a PET/CT scan. What if the CT scan is inconclusive?
The PET/CT scan is gonna give you a better picture of what is going on regarding cancer activity.
From what I could figure out, a rise in CA-125 is not 100% indicative of recurrence...calm down if you can and do your best to play the waiting game; there is still the possibility that you are OK.
Try taking a slow, deep breath and repeating:
I am a strong survivor; I AM a strong survivor; I am a STRONG survivor; I am a strong SURVIVOR; yes, I am!0 -
I know you are probably freightened it will be okLaundryQueen said:Why not get a PET/CT scan?
Whoa, what disappointing news!
If I were in your shoes, I would insist on a PET/CT scan. What if the CT scan is inconclusive?
The PET/CT scan is gonna give you a better picture of what is going on regarding cancer activity.
From what I could figure out, a rise in CA-125 is not 100% indicative of recurrence...calm down if you can and do your best to play the waiting game; there is still the possibility that you are OK.
Try taking a slow, deep breath and repeating:
I am a strong survivor; I AM a strong survivor; I am a STRONG survivor; I am a strong SURVIVOR; yes, I am!
I know you are probably freightened. I will pray fo ryou honey. God will get you through this
Hugs lynda0 -
E.....eward said:chemo?
Have you already had chemo? My mom's CA was over 3000 at recurrance a year ago. Recurrance doesn't mean resistance to chemo necessarily.
This is NOT a
E.....
This is NOT a confirmed recurrence, but generally speaking, a recurrence less than six months after completing first line chemo is regarded as "platinum resistance."
Carlene0 -
HANG IN THERE, VICKI
Good advice from everyone here. I agree that there are lots of possible reasons for this rise. I also agree that if the doctor has continued concerns, maybe a PET scan would be in order. Please keep us informed. Don't think the worst. Sending prayers and hugs.
Monika0 -
another blood test
Could you not have another blood test, or maybe a couple to see if it's a genuine rising trend? I understand that a scan won't always show early recurrent tumors unless they are cohesive masses. Also, there's research to show that early treatment of recurrence doesn't affect ultimate outcomes but DOES affect a patient's quality of life. How are you feeling? If you feel good, maybe they'll give you a bit of a break before resuming chemo. How about an HE4 test to compare w/CA125? Just a thought. Of course, I'm no oncologist.0 -
Keep your chin up
It is a horrid feeling when you think the cancer is on the rise..... but 46 is not toobad at this stage. I have a feeling I may be platinum resistant as my numbers went up whilst I was on carbo/taxol BUT there are loads of different chemos out there to try. I have always tried to look on the positive (believe me its been hard since I was diagnosed) and like to think there will be a chemo that suits me somewhere.
Takem care Tina xx0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards