Is it possible to be told you don’t have cancer without a biopsy?

Therese_

The gynecologist oncologist that I saw today told me that I do not have cancer. My regular gyno could not get a good sample with an EMB so he had referred me to this GO, thinking he could do a frozen section D&C. But instead, he told me flat out that I do not have cancer and that bleeding is most of the time not cancer. I’m post menopausal. He is aware of the fibroids and just went didn’t into discussing a hysterectomy. Should I be concerned?

NoTimeForCancer

I was only 49 and not pre-menopausal when I was dx. I was on the pill and had bleeding in between and my gyn said, "Let's find out what is going on". When she couldn't do the biopsy in the office she scheduled a D&C. That is where they found a polyp - and the rest is history (both 'typical garden variety' and the aggressive USPC).

I don't know how that gyn onc knows without any evidence -did I miss something?? I realize the bleeding might not be anything, but it could. Typically gyn onc's only deal with you when there is cancer because there are so few of them.

If you want an answer than maybe your gyn can do the D&C?

ilovedaisies

https://csn.cancer.org/discussion/329322/is-it-possible-to-be-told-you-don-t-have-cancer-without-a-biopsy

How very confusing! Did they, initially, do an ultrasound? On me, they did a pap, too. How thick was the lining?

At 16.2 mm (vs. normal to 4 mm) and with supposedly tell-tale vascular bleeding, also, personally, I’d want definitive testing..

Everything I read said tell-tale bleeding should never be ignored. Only, I’m banking on my MRI — diagnostic when a biopsy fails, due to cervical stenosis — to, possibly, help me to know/decide? Here’s where I learned about it: https://cancerimagingjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40644-016-0069-1

OB/GYN’d said the biopsy, hitting just one spot, could miss it, where the D&C, getting everything, wouldn’t. It’s about 90% accurate, as they slice it all up, and look at all of it?

The term ‘frozen’ is new to me, though. Is that because that’s what’s needed/done for the slides? Only, is that done while waiting — for further surgery — or reported later, anticipating a GYN/ONC if needed?

Did he reason how he could say that w/o any factual ‘evidence’?

Therese_

So an ultrasound was done by my regular gynecologist. He said there were lots of small fibroids, my lining is 5.5 mm. He said he didn’t see anything that looked odd to him, but the biopsy should confirm. When he called to say the sample was just blood, he said he was referring me to an oncologist because he thinks I should have a frozen section D&C. But he really wanted the oncologist to be the one to determine what should be done next. He reiterated that he doesn’t think I have cancer.

The oncologist told me that the pathology report from the regular gynecologist was blurry/fuzzy, can I tell him what I know. He said that he doesn’t think I have cancer, and he recommends a hysterectomy. Said his scheduler would be calling in a couple of days. His main concern was stopping the bleeding. He did a quick exam to feel everything. I’m wondering if he will end up sending off for a biopsy and he just didn’t tell me. I told him I am good with having a hysterectomy. I don’t want to have to deal with bleeding anymore. He explained the procedure, but no mention of the biopsy and I didn’t think to ask until I left there.

ilovedaisies

Sounds like he and you have decided on a hysterectomy? And both docs don’t think it’s EC? It’s fibroids? A hysterectomy is a big deal. Decades ago, I had both tubes and one ovary removed, but kept the uterus, as I was in my 30’s. Even now, I’d prefer a D&C if that’s all that was needed, vs. the more major operation.

I know little about dealing with fibroids, while two ultrasounds over decades showed a calcified few. Both a friend and a niece have had them, and the niece, especially, dealt, like you, with bleeding and severe cramps. Have you searched this site for how others have dealt with fibroids? My friend had them dried, and they shrunk to smithereens. If it’d help, I could ask both, ultimately, what they did with them.

Without the thickened lining that’s the typical warning for EC (or hyperplasia), it does sound like you were sent to the GYN/ONC simply for the D&C — where the OB/GYN, as with me failed. But why? That's a bit surprising? Did he say why, considering he didn’t think it was EC? Seems, as with mine, he (the OB/GYN), too, could do the D&C.

Not sure though what the goal is with a D&C for fibroids? With the uterus scraped clean, won’t they grow back? But it’s my understanding fibroids grow outside the uterus, too. So, taking only the uterus might not get them all? Seems there might be more to learn? He’s what a quick search found:

MoeKay

Hi Therese,

Before my endometrial biopsy I had an ultrasound which found a lesion that the radiologist described as a "probable fibroid." My gyn-onc went into the surgery thinking in addition to the endometrial cancer found on the biopsy, he would be dealing with the large (4.1 cm) fibroid during my hysterectomy. Turns out that the lesion was not a fibroid at all, but the major site of my cancer. The ultrasound measured my endometrial stripe as approximately 7.3 mm.

While the gyn-onc you saw may very well be correct, I'm not comfortable with his statement that, "bleeding is most of the time not cancer. " I would want to ask, "what about the rest of the time?" If you're going forward with a hysterectomy by this gyn-onc, it probably doesn't matter, as he will deal with whatever he finds when he performs the surgery. Were you comfortable with and do you have complete confidence in the gyn-onc you saw? I got two gyn-onc opinions before my surgery, even though I really liked the first gyn-onc and he had many years experience. He was also highly-regarded by the community and other medical professionals who knew and worked with him. My second opinion gyn-onc confirmed that he completely agreed with what the first gyn-onc had told me.

Wishing you all the best.

MoeKay

oldbeauty

Therese,

I agree with MoeKay, IF you otherwise liked the gyn/onc, and IF he is going to do the hysterectomy, then OK, he'll get to the problem and perform all the inspections and sampling of sentinel lymph nodes, etc. They'd probably do a frozen section of "parts" as they go, looking for cancer. But it also is perfectly OK to get a second opinion to boost your confidence and perhaps meet someone who you feel more comfortable with. If it is cancer, the gyn/onc that does the surgery will be your treating specialist so it makes sense to choose intentionally going in.

Best wishes, Oldbeauty

Therese_

https://csn.cancer.org/discussion/comment/1722506#Comment_1722506

Yes. I do like the oncologist. I trust him and will let him do the surgery. Thanks for your reply. It sounds like you’re saying he will have anything checked out that he might find.