Mouth ulcer WHICH not going away
After my husband’s neck dissection he discover mouth ulcer in is right side of tonsil area where cancer was originate in (END OF July). He was telling his all doctors including oncologist, ENT and they all said it’s just side effect of radiation. My husband has his ENT appointment last week and now ENT want to do biopsy in that area and his radiation oncologist is concern about doing biopsy on radiation area. Does nay one had experience with this about Mouth ulcer and biopsy on radiation area? Anything will be helpful.
Thanks, Hetal
Comments
-
Not much fun, living through this time period
because it lacks a discrete ending. It is entirely possible your husband's ulcer is still just healing from the rads. I had a lot of those, and they took prolly six months to heal completely. And they look pretty ugly while they are there. It isn't wrong to give this some more time, say a few more months to heal prior to biopsy. OTOH, biopsies of this ara are small, on the order of several millimeters, and they do heal ok, just not very fast as you might imagine. One of the risks of early biopsy is that the pathologist gets a tissue sample that simply shows a lot of inflammation, without being definitive. Then the biopsy hasn't helped one way or the other.
This could be done either way, so my opinion on which way isn't voiced, because its only an opinion. Best to you both.
Pat
0 -
Thanks Patlongtermsurvivor said:Not much fun, living through this time period
because it lacks a discrete ending. It is entirely possible your husband's ulcer is still just healing from the rads. I had a lot of those, and they took prolly six months to heal completely. And they look pretty ugly while they are there. It isn't wrong to give this some more time, say a few more months to heal prior to biopsy. OTOH, biopsies of this ara are small, on the order of several millimeters, and they do heal ok, just not very fast as you might imagine. One of the risks of early biopsy is that the pathologist gets a tissue sample that simply shows a lot of inflammation, without being definitive. Then the biopsy hasn't helped one way or the other.
This could be done either way, so my opinion on which way isn't voiced, because its only an opinion. Best to you both.
Pat
Thanks Pat
0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards