The Cancer Survivors Network (CSN) is a peer support community for cancer patients, survivors, caregivers, families, and friends! CSN is a safe place to connect with others who share your interests and experiences.
CT results back. Please give me your opinion...

As Ive explained in the past, the ultra sound said i had a 4cm x 2.5 x 2.5 renal lesion in left upper kidney.
I just picked up the CT Scan and it gives a long list of what isn't there, like lung base lesion, anatomic cardiac lesion etc etc.
But here's the kidney part:
Conclusion: (Mind you-their report screws up by saying Specifically, the renal lesion 3.0 cm (instead of 4cm)
The mass seen on ultrashound likely represents mild to moderate size extrarenal pelvis seen on CT.
Specifically, the renal lesion 3.0 cm in diameter described on the previous ultrashound is not identified by CT. It may be the left extrarenal pelvis. Cholelithiases clearly present on the abdominal ultrasound cannot be identified on the CT examination.
Has anyone had any issues with one test saying one thing and the other test saying completely different?
I don't know which result to believe now-any insight??
I don't have a follow up with my doctor until 2 weeks from today....because he's on vacation.
Comments
-
Sounds like you wont be initiated here:-)
You need to go into details with a radiologist/urologist, but from what I can decipher the lesion in the ultrasound is most likely due to you having an extrarenal pelvis. A relatively rare but in most cases uncomplicated feature.
i think you can safely call off the RCC alert, the chance of a CT scan mis-identifying a tumor as an extrarenal pelvis is far-fetched.
/G
-
"Cholelithiases" means
"Cholelithiases" means Gallstones. They are not always visible on CT
Did you have a Renal CT protocol with contrast? It's a specific type of Ct scan to check for tumors. I know from my own experience that my regular CT showed a mass that "was not clearly cystic". The US didn't show it at all. Only the Renal protocol identified it.
-
Size differences
The CT or other measurements of tumors are to a certain extent 3 dimensional and estimares. The actual size is determined in a biopsy after it is out. Mine was 2.6 cm after the CT and 4.2 cm when measured after surgery. MRI"s give different views. Until the sucker is out and measured its size is an estimated guess.
Icemantoo
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 Cancer Survivors Network Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 122.5K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 455 Bladder Cancer
- 311 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.6K Breast Cancer
- 407 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 681 Leukemia
- 802 Liver Cancer
- 4.2K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 242 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.2K Ovarian Cancer
- 69 Pancreatic Cancer
- 493 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.6K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 544 Sarcoma
- 743 Skin Cancer
- 659 Stomach Cancer
- 192 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.9K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.4K Lifestyle Discussion Boards