Possible Bad News
Comments
-
Nothing confirmed yet...
Oh Jimbo,
I know all too well that you and your wife are sitting on pins and needles. But pour all your energies into a positive direction as will Eric and I and as I am sure all of your family here. We will send prayers your way for positive information on the scan tomorrow and that the 'hot spots' are benign activity. Keep us posted and we will be here with you!
Love to you!
-Michelle0 -
Rain cloud
Jim,
Kevin and I always refer to thing like that as a raincloud - there may be a rain cloud, but we can't worry about the rain that has not fallen yet. . . . I pray that your rain cloud passes by and does not rain.
Many prayers for good news.
Whitney0 -
Easier said than done
Jimbo, I know it's easier said than done, but try not to worry too much until you find out more. You wouldn't believe the gloom and doom that I was given, and as it turned out, it simply was not an accurate report. Hopefully, it will be the same for you.
You will remain in my thoughts and prayers. Hang in there!
Sending you lots of good wishes and hugs,
Melinda0 -
Hoping it is a false positive
Jimbo,
My oncologist is not a believer in PET scans unless they are used to confirm an issue identified in a CT scan. He says he sees so many false positives that cause anxiety only to be found to be an infection, or scar tissue, or something else. I know it is hard to not to get ahead of your oncologist's analysis but try to remember it is not an issue until he says it is.
I will be hoping and praying for a false positive.
Best Regards,
Paul Adams
McCormick, South Carolina
DX 10/22/2009 T2N1M0 Stage IIB
12/03/2009 Ivor Lewis
2/8 through 6/14/2010 Adjuvant Chemo Cisplatin, Epirubicin, 5 FU
Two year survivor0 -
I'm sorry you and your
I'm sorry you and your family have to wait to findout more, I'm glad you were able to move the appointment up to tomorrow. I will pray they have good news for you.0 -
I've done a lot of reading
I've done a lot of reading on here and Dr. Google and I see that there is a lot of concern with false positives and PETs. Along the lines of what Paul said, I saw Dr. Gibson at UPMC right after the path came back from my nodes. If I recall correctly, he mentioned that he prefered CTs unless something came back of interest on it then he would do a PET. I brought this on myself by getting the results early rather than waiting for my oncologist to read it. My GP is an amazing friend and doctor but he even defered to the oncologist. We just read over the radiologist report with me. Radiologist include every detail they see in an imaging study no matter how insignificant.
I feel so guilty for being concerned when so many of us here are going through so much more. I appreciate everyone on here for your love, concerns and prayer. I feel so close to so many of you. It really hurts when I read of your bad news and I get so darn happy when I see your good news.
I'm going to try not to worry too much tonight. Thanks everyone!0 -
Breathe Breathe Breathe YOU WILL KNOW MORE TOMORROW...JimboC said:I've done a lot of reading
I've done a lot of reading on here and Dr. Google and I see that there is a lot of concern with false positives and PETs. Along the lines of what Paul said, I saw Dr. Gibson at UPMC right after the path came back from my nodes. If I recall correctly, he mentioned that he prefered CTs unless something came back of interest on it then he would do a PET. I brought this on myself by getting the results early rather than waiting for my oncologist to read it. My GP is an amazing friend and doctor but he even defered to the oncologist. We just read over the radiologist report with me. Radiologist include every detail they see in an imaging study no matter how insignificant.
I feel so guilty for being concerned when so many of us here are going through so much more. I appreciate everyone on here for your love, concerns and prayer. I feel so close to so many of you. It really hurts when I read of your bad news and I get so darn happy when I see your good news.
I'm going to try not to worry too much tonight. Thanks everyone!
Jimbo,
Yes PET's are notoriously fuzzy and only glow. They do NOT have the details of a CT so don't freak. Breathe. I know that it take over a MILLION cancer cells to make a tiny white spot the size of your PINKY nail on the scan, and at that, it's fuzzy and grainy.
WAIT and find out.
We are ALL praying for you and pulling for all false positives and good news.
We love you. Hang in there. We all wait to hear more....
God bless you both,
Eric
PS-that's NOT me in my profile pic. I just love the idea....It ain't the smoking as CHEMOSMOKER says. lol0 -
Here's what we know at this point....
My oncologist is most concerned about the one lymph node near the esophagus that showed up hot. He was going to call Dr. Luketich and see what how he wanted to proceed. My oncologist said absent a tissue sample, no issue exists so he felt we would probably need an EUS with a biopsy. If it is cancerious, given it's location, it's still localized and thus treatable either by surgery or radiation. So, not bad news. I'll be heading to Pittsburgh next week to see what it all means. I'm going prepared to spend a bit of time and hopefully get this resolved.
Thanks everyone!0 -
Wonderful that what youJimboC said:Here's what we know at this point....
My oncologist is most concerned about the one lymph node near the esophagus that showed up hot. He was going to call Dr. Luketich and see what how he wanted to proceed. My oncologist said absent a tissue sample, no issue exists so he felt we would probably need an EUS with a biopsy. If it is cancerious, given it's location, it's still localized and thus treatable either by surgery or radiation. So, not bad news. I'll be heading to Pittsburgh next week to see what it all means. I'm going prepared to spend a bit of time and hopefully get this resolved.
Thanks everyone!
Wonderful that what you thought was bad news is not afterall and an operation or radium will resolve it. So different to what I was told in England. Really pleased for you. Good luck.
Ann (2)0 -
Not totally bad newsJimboC said:Here's what we know at this point....
My oncologist is most concerned about the one lymph node near the esophagus that showed up hot. He was going to call Dr. Luketich and see what how he wanted to proceed. My oncologist said absent a tissue sample, no issue exists so he felt we would probably need an EUS with a biopsy. If it is cancerious, given it's location, it's still localized and thus treatable either by surgery or radiation. So, not bad news. I'll be heading to Pittsburgh next week to see what it all means. I'm going prepared to spend a bit of time and hopefully get this resolved.
Thanks everyone!
Jimbo,
Well, not the "nothing to worry about" answer we were hoping for, but it sounds like even if it does develop into something that needs to be addressed they have a plan.
I guess we will just have to keep our fingers crossed a bit longer until you get some feedback from the team at UPMC.
I will be praying that things go well in Pittsburgh.
Best Regards,
Paul Adams
McCormick, South Carolina
DX 10/22/2009 T2N1M0 Stage IIB
12/03/2009 Ivor Lewis
2/8 through 6/14/2010 Adjuvant Chemo Cisplatin, Epirubicin, 5 FU
Two year survivor
Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we are here we might as well dance!0 -
Paul said it allJimboC said:Here's what we know at this point....
My oncologist is most concerned about the one lymph node near the esophagus that showed up hot. He was going to call Dr. Luketich and see what how he wanted to proceed. My oncologist said absent a tissue sample, no issue exists so he felt we would probably need an EUS with a biopsy. If it is cancerious, given it's location, it's still localized and thus treatable either by surgery or radiation. So, not bad news. I'll be heading to Pittsburgh next week to see what it all means. I'm going prepared to spend a bit of time and hopefully get this resolved.
Thanks everyone!
I totally agree with Paul. While not the best news, it's also not the worst. Thank goodness it appears that you will be able to deal with it.
Keeping you in my thoughts and prayers.
Please keep us updated as you can.
Melinda0 -
Paul is rightJimboC said:Here's what we know at this point....
My oncologist is most concerned about the one lymph node near the esophagus that showed up hot. He was going to call Dr. Luketich and see what how he wanted to proceed. My oncologist said absent a tissue sample, no issue exists so he felt we would probably need an EUS with a biopsy. If it is cancerious, given it's location, it's still localized and thus treatable either by surgery or radiation. So, not bad news. I'll be heading to Pittsburgh next week to see what it all means. I'm going prepared to spend a bit of time and hopefully get this resolved.
Thanks everyone!
It's wonderful to have a plan. Sounds like you have a great time behind you, Jimbo! You couldn't ask for more in this situation.
Glad also that you can get in to the Pittsburgh docs so quickly. That's a blessing.
Know that we are here rooting for you. Lots of prayers and hugs to you and your family!
Terry0 -
Now that you know.JimboC said:Here's what we know at this point....
My oncologist is most concerned about the one lymph node near the esophagus that showed up hot. He was going to call Dr. Luketich and see what how he wanted to proceed. My oncologist said absent a tissue sample, no issue exists so he felt we would probably need an EUS with a biopsy. If it is cancerious, given it's location, it's still localized and thus treatable either by surgery or radiation. So, not bad news. I'll be heading to Pittsburgh next week to see what it all means. I'm going prepared to spend a bit of time and hopefully get this resolved.
Thanks everyone!
It sounds like you have a wonderful team of doctors. The hot spot can be treated. You and your doctors are on top of things. You will be in Pittsburgh next week. Now..you guys need a few good nights sleep. Have a WONDERFUL WEEKEND...NO WORRIES....HAVE FUN...!
SAL (:(:(:(:0 -
I'm very glad to be headingJimboC said:I've done a lot of reading
I've done a lot of reading on here and Dr. Google and I see that there is a lot of concern with false positives and PETs. Along the lines of what Paul said, I saw Dr. Gibson at UPMC right after the path came back from my nodes. If I recall correctly, he mentioned that he prefered CTs unless something came back of interest on it then he would do a PET. I brought this on myself by getting the results early rather than waiting for my oncologist to read it. My GP is an amazing friend and doctor but he even defered to the oncologist. We just read over the radiologist report with me. Radiologist include every detail they see in an imaging study no matter how insignificant.
I feel so guilty for being concerned when so many of us here are going through so much more. I appreciate everyone on here for your love, concerns and prayer. I feel so close to so many of you. It really hurts when I read of your bad news and I get so darn happy when I see your good news.
I'm going to try not to worry too much tonight. Thanks everyone!
I'm very glad to be heading to Pittsburgh for this. I am convinced it is one of the best places you can go. As soon as my Oncologist reviewed the PET with me, he said he'd be contacting Dr. Luketich. They are great up there. My ultimate hope is that it isn't cancer so we can just relax but part of me wonders if it is just an early reoccurance.0 -
Keeping you in our thoughts.JimboC said:Here's what we know at this point....
My oncologist is most concerned about the one lymph node near the esophagus that showed up hot. He was going to call Dr. Luketich and see what how he wanted to proceed. My oncologist said absent a tissue sample, no issue exists so he felt we would probably need an EUS with a biopsy. If it is cancerious, given it's location, it's still localized and thus treatable either by surgery or radiation. So, not bad news. I'll be heading to Pittsburgh next week to see what it all means. I'm going prepared to spend a bit of time and hopefully get this resolved.
Thanks everyone!
I really hang on the words that the doctor tells us. If they are positive, we're positive. From what the oncologist said it appears you have to deal with a problem but that it can be taken care of. That sounds like a plan. Good luck and safe trip on your trip to Pittsburgh. BMGky0 -
Jimbo,BMGky said:Keeping you in our thoughts.
I really hang on the words that the doctor tells us. If they are positive, we're positive. From what the oncologist said it appears you have to deal with a problem but that it can be taken care of. That sounds like a plan. Good luck and safe trip on your trip to Pittsburgh. BMGky
I'm keeping you in
Jimbo,
I'm keeping you in thoughts and prayers. Dr. Luketich is a wonderful dr. and I'm sure he will come up with a plan. What day are you headed to Pittsburgh? Where are you staying?
Prayers to you,
Carolyn0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards