The Cancer Survivors Network (CSN) is a peer support community for cancer patients, survivors, caregivers, families, and friends! CSN is a safe place to connect with others who share your interests and experiences.
Post Pet Scan Results
Comments
-
You are right, that makessweetblood22 said:primary as hot spot
well, idk anything about pet scans, really, but wouldn't is make sense or even be "better" if the hot spot were the primary tumor site, because that would have been the greatest radiated spot, and then the hot spot would more likely be because of damage, no? as opposed to it being some new random spot to worry about. course what makes sense in my head, doesn't always fly. i have only had the one pet scan before my surgery and way before rads started.
You are right, that makes perfect sense. I am hoping that it is radiation damage. I am wondering why the doctor would recommend another biopsy as opposed to waiting it out. -
NOOOOOO!!!! What, are youratface said:My values
For comparison's sake my original PET SUV for the the cervical lymph node was 9.8 and my primary site at the BOT was 4.8. Biopsy is really the only definitive way of knowing. FNA biopsies leave much to be desired but it is your first step. It may be inconclusive as well so prepare yourself for an actual surgical biopsy next. Wishing you the best outcome!
NOOOOOO!!!! What, are you trying to burst my happy bubble today.. LOL!! I know the FNA is not the most popular way to go. I have full confidence in my husbands ENT surgeon and I have to beleive he knows what he is doing. Thanks for the heads up. -
arndogarndog64 said:NOOOOOO!!!! What, are you
NOOOOOO!!!! What, are you trying to burst my happy bubble today.. LOL!! I know the FNA is not the most popular way to go. I have full confidence in my husbands ENT surgeon and I have to beleive he knows what he is doing. Thanks for the heads up.
Will be thinking about you guys next week. Sending positive thoughts your way for a clear biopsy!
Greg -
If it makes you feel any better...arndog64 said:NOOOOOO!!!! What, are you
NOOOOOO!!!! What, are you trying to burst my happy bubble today.. LOL!! I know the FNA is not the most popular way to go. I have full confidence in my husbands ENT surgeon and I have to beleive he knows what he is doing. Thanks for the heads up.
Our situation mirrored yours exactly. ENT was half conveinced that there was residual cancer at the original tumour site. A month down the road - biopsies, scans and a whole lot of nailbiting..NED! Don't put too much emphasis on those Sports Utility Vehicles. They fooled us too!
W.
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 Cancer Survivors Network Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 122.6K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 456 Bladder Cancer
- 312 Bone Cancers
- 1.7K Brain Cancer
- 28.6K Breast Cancer
- 408 Childhood Cancers
- 28K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13.1K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 681 Leukemia
- 803 Liver Cancer
- 4.2K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 242 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.2K Ovarian Cancer
- 70 Pancreatic Cancer
- 493 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.6K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 544 Sarcoma
- 743 Skin Cancer
- 659 Stomach Cancer
- 192 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.9K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.4K Lifestyle Discussion Boards