Has anyone ever heard of this happening?
Comments
-
I am having a mastectomy
I am having a mastectomy with small invasive tumor (my decision also)..I will not have to have radiation or chemo unless my pathology is way worse then they think or nodes are positive which they do not think are they are. That part is pretty standard I know. I am ER+ HER2- also. I cannot address the after drugs though ( tamoxifen etc.) as I'm not there yet. I have read and heard that the after drugs are important. I am sure there are some women out there that can address the drugs as everyone seems so knowledgable.0 -
I had a similar situation
I had a similar situation but my cancer was found during breast reduction surgery. It was small 3 mm and ER & PR+ HER2-. I had a bilateral mastectomy in Dec 09 and no further treatment was necessary. They put me on Arimidex and then Femara but I couldn't handle either of those drugs. I just started taking Tamoxifen a couple weeks ago.
Best,
Dot0 -
Second opinion
I think I would get the opinion of another oncologist, if I were you. I hope you, indeed, are that lucky!0 -
My onc told me that, becauseDot53 said:I had a similar situation
I had a similar situation but my cancer was found during breast reduction surgery. It was small 3 mm and ER & PR+ HER2-. I had a bilateral mastectomy in Dec 09 and no further treatment was necessary. They put me on Arimidex and then Femara but I couldn't handle either of those drugs. I just started taking Tamoxifen a couple weeks ago.
Best,
Dot
My onc told me that, because I had the bilateral mastectomy, I was what he would consider to be "on the fence". By that, he means that the risks of taking Tamoxifen are greater than my chance of recurrence. If my HER2 had been positive, he would have wanted me to take the Tamoxifen, but even then, the risks from Tamoxifen would have been equal to the benefits. It really seems to be a numbers game, doesn't it?0 -
second opinionChristine Louise said:Second opinion
I think I would get the opinion of another oncologist, if I were you. I hope you, indeed, are that lucky!
I agree that a second oncologist opinion is a good idea.0 -
Second opinionRitzy said:If it were me, I would
If it were me, I would definitely get a second opinion.
Wishing you good luck!
Sue
I agree with everyone. If your were Her2+ you would be on Herceptin. Since you are Er+ standard of care usually recommend estrogen blocker -hormonal therapy. Weather or not to use Tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors depends on your menopausal status and other factors. I do not you will confident until another doctor support original approach.
Wishing you the best,
New Flower0 -
Onc and I discussedNew Flower said:Second opinion
I agree with everyone. If your were Her2+ you would be on Herceptin. Since you are Er+ standard of care usually recommend estrogen blocker -hormonal therapy. Weather or not to use Tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors depends on your menopausal status and other factors. I do not you will confident until another doctor support original approach.
Wishing you the best,
New Flower
Onc and I discussed Tamoxifen but because of other health issues, he felt that the risks of hormonal therapy outweighed the benefits. He said that, because I had the bilateral mastectomy, that was as aggressive as I could get.0 -
sounds good, but I am thesparky72156 said:Onc and I discussed
Onc and I discussed Tamoxifen but because of other health issues, he felt that the risks of hormonal therapy outweighed the benefits. He said that, because I had the bilateral mastectomy, that was as aggressive as I could get.
sounds good, but I am the queen of second opinions and you need to know that now, not if you are wondering in a year.0 -
Dear Sparky
I had a lumpectomy and sentinel node excision on 3/17. My mass was considered, early and small at 3 mm and ER & PR+ HER2-. I was told that because I had a lumpectomy I will need radiation and hormone treatment x5 yrs. It seems likely that with your situation, there is no further treatment required at this time however, it sounds like you are uneasy about this so I agree with the others that a seoncd opinion appears to make good sense. Good luck and let us know how it goes.
K0 -
I like 2nd opinions if thereNew Flower said:Second opinion
I agree with everyone. If your were Her2+ you would be on Herceptin. Since you are Er+ standard of care usually recommend estrogen blocker -hormonal therapy. Weather or not to use Tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors depends on your menopausal status and other factors. I do not you will confident until another doctor support original approach.
Wishing you the best,
New Flower
I like 2nd opinions if there is even one small piece of you that thinks you need and want it. Good luck
Leeza0 -
2nd opinionsparky72156 said:Onc and I discussed
Onc and I discussed Tamoxifen but because of other health issues, he felt that the risks of hormonal therapy outweighed the benefits. He said that, because I had the bilateral mastectomy, that was as aggressive as I could get.
I had a bilateral also, my situation is very similiar to yours. (I couldn't have rads due to having rads for Hodgkins Lymphoma). Tamoxifen was too risky for me too. I went for a second opinion to a large, well known cancer center and received the same opinion as the first. Also, my oncologist said there is some merit in the research that a good diet is as beneficial as taking tamoxifen. Best wishes.
Cathy0 -
I am so glad to hear thate_hope said:true
I have heard of that.. and have met 2 different woman with similar circumstances.. but if you feel uncertain you should get a second opinion. I was not fortune enough to not have chemo, but I still went to 2 different oncologist to see what they had to say.
I am so glad to hear that someone else has heard of that happening! I adore my oncologist and I know that he is very current on all the literature and has been practicing for many years. So I don't feel that I need a second opinion. I am just really glad to hear that it has happened to others! Thanks, ehope.0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 122.1K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 448 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 673 Leukemia
- 795 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 239 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.2K Ovarian Cancer
- 65 Pancreatic Cancer
- 490 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 543 Sarcoma
- 738 Skin Cancer
- 658 Stomach Cancer
- 192 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.9K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards