Scan Denial
Pewter
Member Posts: 24
I have what I consider to be an outrageous question: Has anyone in this group been denied approval from their insurance of a diagnostic or therapeutic regimen for their colon cancer?
I was diagnosed with Stage III CC 9/02, had 6 mons 5 F/U, and four months after a liver recurrence was found. I had it successfully resected, followed by more (different) chemo. My CEA levels rose during chemo, and have sort of stayed up, without any significant evidence of disease. My last PET (2 months ago) showed a "questionable" new shadow and an area of increased uptake at the resection site. An MRI (which proves better for my liver) showed the old scar, but nothing else new. The recommendation from the radiologists was to repeat the PET in 2-3 months.
My insurance company has denied the scan, stating it appears the PET is being used for routine surveillence. My oncologist appealled this twice, and failed both times. I'm not sure it can be fought any further, and I sure can't afford the PET on my own.
Anytime I have a CT scan, it shows a lot of abnormalities, and I inevitably have to have a follow-up MRI and then a PET. The insurance company morons don't seem to get it, and I don't know what to do, though I know I won't sit around a wait for a year (when they say a follow-up PET is advised) to see if it is a recurrent lesion.
Any suggestions guys??
Pewter
I was diagnosed with Stage III CC 9/02, had 6 mons 5 F/U, and four months after a liver recurrence was found. I had it successfully resected, followed by more (different) chemo. My CEA levels rose during chemo, and have sort of stayed up, without any significant evidence of disease. My last PET (2 months ago) showed a "questionable" new shadow and an area of increased uptake at the resection site. An MRI (which proves better for my liver) showed the old scar, but nothing else new. The recommendation from the radiologists was to repeat the PET in 2-3 months.
My insurance company has denied the scan, stating it appears the PET is being used for routine surveillence. My oncologist appealled this twice, and failed both times. I'm not sure it can be fought any further, and I sure can't afford the PET on my own.
Anytime I have a CT scan, it shows a lot of abnormalities, and I inevitably have to have a follow-up MRI and then a PET. The insurance company morons don't seem to get it, and I don't know what to do, though I know I won't sit around a wait for a year (when they say a follow-up PET is advised) to see if it is a recurrent lesion.
Any suggestions guys??
Pewter
0
Comments
-
You must follow up with an appeal to this denial. Most likely the doctors on the insurance board are not a Onocologist or Hemotologist I
had the same situation. But, after many letters and fights I won! The insurance company HEALTH AMERICA reinburst me for my pet scan.
God Bless you,
Maura0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.9K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 398 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 794 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 63 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 540 Sarcoma
- 733 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards