USER UNFRIENDLY!
inkblot
CSN Member Posts: 698
Hi:
Just posting to say that this new format seems to be one big glitch. I'm finding it very user unfriendly and confusing. My mail box shows, as NEW messages, e-mails, which were already read and replied to, over two weeks ago. I seldom ever go to chat, but WHERE is it, for those ladies who frequently use it?
Postings (DISCUSSION)are not recent at all. I posted just yesterday and they're nowhere to be found. Where did those postings go?
IF this is the final product, then I daresay I won't be visiting very often in the future. Far too difficult to navigate. That would be quite a disappointment. Perhaps other regular's here will have the patience to try to continue with the new system but this format is not making it easy for anyone. Just my opinion, but I would expect that new visitor's will find the site even more difficult to navigate than those of us who've been here for a while and thus be discouraged. This would defeat the very purpose of the site for which funding is allocated.
ADMINISTRATOR: PLEASE address these issues? Or let us know what to expect?
Many thanks,
Ink
Just posting to say that this new format seems to be one big glitch. I'm finding it very user unfriendly and confusing. My mail box shows, as NEW messages, e-mails, which were already read and replied to, over two weeks ago. I seldom ever go to chat, but WHERE is it, for those ladies who frequently use it?
Postings (DISCUSSION)are not recent at all. I posted just yesterday and they're nowhere to be found. Where did those postings go?
IF this is the final product, then I daresay I won't be visiting very often in the future. Far too difficult to navigate. That would be quite a disappointment. Perhaps other regular's here will have the patience to try to continue with the new system but this format is not making it easy for anyone. Just my opinion, but I would expect that new visitor's will find the site even more difficult to navigate than those of us who've been here for a while and thus be discouraged. This would defeat the very purpose of the site for which funding is allocated.
ADMINISTRATOR: PLEASE address these issues? Or let us know what to expect?
Many thanks,
Ink
0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 122.3K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 451 Bladder Cancer
- 310 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 399 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 677 Leukemia
- 799 Liver Cancer
- 4.2K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 240 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.2K Ovarian Cancer
- 65 Pancreatic Cancer
- 492 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.6K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 544 Sarcoma
- 740 Skin Cancer
- 658 Stomach Cancer
- 192 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.9K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards