USER UNFRIENDLY!
inkblot
Member Posts: 698 Member
Hi:
Just posting to say that this new format seems to be one big glitch. I'm finding it very user unfriendly and confusing. My mail box shows, as NEW messages, e-mails, which were already read and replied to, over two weeks ago. I seldom ever go to chat, but WHERE is it, for those ladies who frequently use it?
Postings (DISCUSSION)are not recent at all. I posted just yesterday and they're nowhere to be found. Where did those postings go?
IF this is the final product, then I daresay I won't be visiting very often in the future. Far too difficult to navigate. That would be quite a disappointment. Perhaps other regular's here will have the patience to try to continue with the new system but this format is not making it easy for anyone. Just my opinion, but I would expect that new visitor's will find the site even more difficult to navigate than those of us who've been here for a while and thus be discouraged. This would defeat the very purpose of the site for which funding is allocated.
ADMINISTRATOR: PLEASE address these issues? Or let us know what to expect?
Many thanks,
Ink
Just posting to say that this new format seems to be one big glitch. I'm finding it very user unfriendly and confusing. My mail box shows, as NEW messages, e-mails, which were already read and replied to, over two weeks ago. I seldom ever go to chat, but WHERE is it, for those ladies who frequently use it?
Postings (DISCUSSION)are not recent at all. I posted just yesterday and they're nowhere to be found. Where did those postings go?
IF this is the final product, then I daresay I won't be visiting very often in the future. Far too difficult to navigate. That would be quite a disappointment. Perhaps other regular's here will have the patience to try to continue with the new system but this format is not making it easy for anyone. Just my opinion, but I would expect that new visitor's will find the site even more difficult to navigate than those of us who've been here for a while and thus be discouraged. This would defeat the very purpose of the site for which funding is allocated.
ADMINISTRATOR: PLEASE address these issues? Or let us know what to expect?
Many thanks,
Ink
0
Discussion Boards
- All Discussion Boards
- 6 CSN Information
- 6 Welcome to CSN
- 121.8K Cancer specific
- 2.8K Anal Cancer
- 446 Bladder Cancer
- 309 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.5K Breast Cancer
- 397 Childhood Cancers
- 27.9K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.6K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.2K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 13K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.4K Kidney Cancer
- 671 Leukemia
- 792 Liver Cancer
- 4.1K Lung Cancer
- 5.1K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 237 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 61 Pancreatic Cancer
- 487 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5.5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.2K Rare and Other Cancers
- 539 Sarcoma
- 730 Skin Cancer
- 653 Stomach Cancer
- 191 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.8K Uterine/Endometrial Cancer
- 6.3K Lifestyle Discussion Boards