Potential new treatment - NO publications, unfortunately
Unfortunately, it seems that their claim was probably made to raise more funding. They're now saying they can't publish because they can't afford to.
Scientists don't PAY to get studies published - they submit them to peer-reviewed journals for evaluation, and the ones that appear to be valid and worthwhile are published. So it's likely that they don't have publishable results.
It's an elegant concept, but no proof yet. Sorry that the follow up to the initial posting was delayed by the CSN outage.
Comments
-
I was skeptical from the get-go
There are so many variations of cancer that it would be difficult to imagine something that could get rid of all of them. If this approach helps people with some types of cancer, though, it would be great.
But this development is NOT helping the researcher's credibility any.0
Discussion Boards
- 118.9K All Discussion Boards
- 5 CSN Information
- 5 Welcome to CSN
- 118.9K Cancer specific
- 2.7K Anal Cancer
- 421 Bladder Cancer
- 297 Bone Cancers
- 1.6K Brain Cancer
- 28.1K Breast Cancer
- 374 Childhood Cancers
- 27.6K Colorectal Cancer
- 4.5K Esophageal Cancer
- 1.1K Gynecological Cancers (other than ovarian and uterine)
- 12.6K Head and Neck Cancer
- 6.1K Kidney Cancer
- 638 Leukemia
- 759 Liver Cancer
- 4K Lung Cancer
- 5K Lymphoma (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin)
- 212 Multiple Myeloma
- 7.1K Ovarian Cancer
- 31 Pancreatic Cancer
- 477 Peritoneal Cancer
- 5K Prostate Cancer
- 1.1K Rare and Other Cancers
- 519 Sarcoma
- 687 Skin Cancer
- 632 Stomach Cancer
- 189 Testicular Cancer
- 1.5K Thyroid Cancer
- 5.6K Uterine Cancer
- 6.2K Other Discussion Boards