CSN Login
Members Online: 8

You are here


Posts: 1
Joined: Mar 2015

Recently diagnosed with pc. Stage 2, psa 4.0, gleason 7 (3+7). I am 69 years old generally good health. Surgery recommended which I plan

to do on the 31st of this month. Hope I made the right decision. Wanted to get second opinion, but other Urologist are six months out for

taking new appointments and can't wait that long as it was strongly recommended to have the surgery done in the next three months.

hopeful and opt...
Posts: 2336
Joined: Apr 2009



I am sorry for your diagnosis.

Surgery is not the only decision for treatment that you might wish to consider. There are also other treatment options to include various form of radiation , IMRT, SBRT, proton, etc. that may be appropriate. It might even be that you can consider "Active Surveillance with Delayed Treatment if necessary" .

In order to provide you with input, so that you can make a best decision, more information is needed from you about your biopsy results and  and what led to you getting a biopsy..

First , why did you receive a biopsy?

Any urological signs?

What is your PSA history?

 What did the digital rectal exam show(finger wave)?

Did you have any other diagnostic tests?, PCA3, MRI with a T3 Magnet, etc, etc. What were the results of these?


Biopsy....Do you have a copy of the pathological report? How many cores were taken? How many were positive? Of each core that was positive, what was the Gleason, and involvement, that is what percent of each core was positive? 

Any other notes on the pathology report.




I do not understand why you would need to wait six months for a second opinion by a specialist. By the way there are radiation oncologists with various specialties, medical oncologists. Additionally there is a difference between urologists...some are better qualified than others....you would want to evaluate....we can help. 

Max Former Hodg...
Posts: 3699
Joined: May 2012


I agree with all that Hopeful related to you. It is very rare, almost unheard of here, for a man to go immediately into treatmtdent on the recommendation of only one doctor.

Make an appointment with a rediation oncologist to discuss radiation options, which will allow you to avoid surgery (in most cases). For Stage 1 and 2 disease, Radiation as initial treatment is (statistically) as successful as surgical removal. A six month wait for ANY doctor is ridiculous. 

I had surgical removal last month at the age of 58, and it is not something to rush in to without reviewing options.


VascodaGama's picture
Posts: 3406
Joined: Nov 2010

I completely agree with the opinions above forwarded. You were set into a trap or, for whatever reason it may be you may not be judging things properly.

Surgery for prostate cancer is not a walk in the park. It has many pitfalls that you should be aware of before deciding. Apart of that surgery could as well not be the proper treatment for your case. Maybe your insurance only covers services at busy facilities or pays consultation fees every six months, or you are engaged with a NHS system.

I wonder what you are looking for in this forum and what is causing such “requirement” for a premature surgery without knowing the opinion of other doctors in advance. I think that you still have time to postpone the surgery so that you may secure more details to be totally satisfied with the choice. Peace of mind is worth the simple cost of a second opinion (80 €).

Best wishes for your judgement.


Posts: 1013
Joined: Mar 2010

Ditto to what everyone else said.

I generally consider surgery to be the absolute WORST choice one can make for the treatment of PCa.  There are a lot of reasons for this, which one can easily discover with some brief reaseach.  I suppose there are certain cases there surgery would be considered the best option but, frankly, I am at a loss to name them. 

However, if surgery is the best option in your case (Jcat69), it would really be in your best interest to make a reasoned decision based on consideration of ALL of the other options available to you, which you obviously have not done yet.

stoniphi's picture
Posts: 54
Joined: Mar 2015

I would hesitate to make value judgements on the various options available until such time as all of the pertinant information has been offered up. All Pca treatments - or non treatment - have side effects and related hazards to consider....on a case by case basis.

FE140.6's picture
Posts: 1
Joined: Mar 2015

I had my surgery in April 2008. at age 60. Robotic surgery was done but i had issues with a stitch pulling loose because of an incompetent nurse mistakenly pulling on the catheter right after surgery. Big mistake was going to heart ward for monitoring because of sleep apnea, instead of the surgery ward. THis is the only problem I had aside from having the catheter in for 2 weeksa.

My PSA has been .001 ever since. Surgery for me the right decision and i would do the same thing over agian.

Back to normal within  a year and i never went for a 2nd opinion. Had the biopsy and surgery within 3 months.

No issues aside from minor ED issues.

Good luck with whatever you decide.



Posts: 25
Joined: Jan 2016



You need to move on this and do the research.  Change them if you need to !

Posts: 25
Joined: Jan 2016


 i opted for the hormone brachytherapy and radiation combination.  So far no serious side effects.   Maybe there will be but so far so good.

Subscribe to Comments for "Surgery"