Hello just diagnosed and very frightened

1567911

Comments

  • lighterwood67
    lighterwood67 Member Posts: 374 Member
    Steve1961 said:

    Word to the wise

    I dint know how relevant the decifer test is ..but we will find out ....I guess my insurance is paying for it since UCSF ordered it ....I wish I would have ordered it myself or demanded it get done ..who knows maybe these last 4 months could have meant the matter of living 5 or 10years more i hope it all turns out good....any new people on the forum should be told about this testing and what is going on with me one can’t just go by Gleason Score anymore it’s just not that accurate ...

    Decipher Test

    Decipher is a transformative genomic test that informs decisions about the course of treatment for men after prostate surgery.

    The Decipher test predicts the probability of metastasis after surgery and provides an independent assessment of tumor aggressiveness; information distinct from that provided by Gleason score or PSA

    Decipher has been validated in over 2,000 patients in clinical studies with key US cancer centers and centers of excellence.

  • Steve1961
    Steve1961 Member Posts: 505 Member
    edited April 2018 #163

    Decipher Test

    Decipher is a transformative genomic test that informs decisions about the course of treatment for men after prostate surgery.

    The Decipher test predicts the probability of metastasis after surgery and provides an independent assessment of tumor aggressiveness; information distinct from that provided by Gleason score or PSA

    Decipher has been validated in over 2,000 patients in clinical studies with key US cancer centers and centers of excellence.

    I believe it

    I believe it I’m just upset that 2 drs dismissed it and said it wasn’t needed ,when I asked if we should do it ...drs at stanford number 8 in the country .....like I said hopefully all will be ok ....then again you better have a gooD pathologist as well ..Stanford see no cribform or pni where as UCSF does .it took the 4th dr at UCSF to Oder genomic and to have UCSF look at he slides  ...the first dr cyber knife guy at UCSf told me UCSF didn’t need to look it over they work with stanfird and trust them what a crock of **** 

  • RobLee
    RobLee Member Posts: 269 Member
    Steve1961 said:

    More clearly

    ok everyone does seem to,still think this is still contained ...mri bone scan sonogram  PSA still low 8.0 just the decipher report is saying that it is a high risk tumor...at first they wanted to do 2 treatments of hi dose radiation Brachytherapy in one day and that was it ...now finding out that  it is of high risk they want to. be more conventional and 25 treatments external combined with 1 hi dose brachytherapy...or surgeon suggests removal get it out and go for a cure ....but surgeon also said I could do the radiation and the long term outcome would be the same .....so what the heck do I do ...confusing ..this is all UCSF by the way ...i can’t just dismiss the decifer results because not everyone  recognizes it ...Stanford doesn’t they dint even care about what decifer found ...also UCSF found PNI invasion in core 6 which Stanford and the original didn’t ... so I hope that everyone can see why I confuse as hell now....do I go radiation knowing the cancer is high risk when high risk usually isn’t an option for Brachy or do I take it out and hope there was no pni and it didn’t escape ....let’s not forget it’s been 5 months since biopsy so it could be worse now ..but last PSA was a month ago and it dropped a bit that’s good I guess 

    Clear as mud

    Steve, I don't know anything about cribiform or decypher. It seems they are just clouding the waters. And PNI is very common. The nerve pathways are usually the early route that cancer cell invade trying to escape the prostate. What is most important is your PSA and the Gleason, percentage and number of cores.  I had four cores with 40-100% G8(4+4) with a PSA of 25.  Much of that made me ineligible for some forms of radiation, so I had even fewer choices. Plus the time crunch I mentioned earlier. And I felt uncomfortable with the accuracy of scans guding where the radiation would go.

    As it turned out the MRI wasn't totally accurate anyway.  My urologist (or the radiologist reading the MRI) said my largest tumor was close to the capsule wall, but once he removed my prostate it turned out that the tumor had actually spread outside the prostate in three places and had invaded both seminal vesicles and the bladder neck.  He said that he had to cut away a lot of tissue but I was left with negative margins and negative nodes.  My last two PSA's have been 0.00.  I don't believe that any radiation oncologist would have ebeen able to match that.

    I am still 100% confident that I made the right choice initially. I had done zero research and went only on answers to my questions and on hunches only. FWIW my urologist insisted that I speak with a RO before he would operate on me.  Things that happened before and after the surgery certainly could have gone better, but the surgery itself went like clockwork.  Some may say, yeah, but you still had cancer after the surgery and it left you incontinent.  But on the oter hand, I knew EXACTLY what was going on in there. No guesswork, no "scans indicate" and no wondering anything was missed.  Could my cancer return someday?  Quite possibly, but it would have to be due to micromets that had already entered my bloodstream before the surgery, and radiation would have missed that too.

    So I consider myself fortunate that I did not have time to hem and haw and sweat over too many options.  I had to make a quick decision and just go with it.

  • hopeful and optimistic
    hopeful and optimistic Member Posts: 2,339 Member
    Family meeting

    Remember that the final decision is up to you, and you alone, since you will have to live with any side effects from treatment....you may wish to listen to others, however YOU are the one that has to make a decision. As Truman said, "the buck stops here".

  • RN4Answer
    RN4Answer Member Posts: 8
    Just got my PSA Results

    Would appreciate it if you can please share your thoughts.

    I was diagonsed with prostate cancer back in 2002. Gleason was 3+3. Had Radical Prostatectomy in 2002. PSA has been Zero until last week (15years). Results from last week showed 3ng/ml PSA which came as a complete shock. Anyone knows what is happening? Could it be an error?

     

    Thank you very much

  • hopeful and optimistic
    hopeful and optimistic Member Posts: 2,339 Member
    rn4answer

    Please start a new thread that can be devoted to your situation

    click discussion board upper left corner above; then, click "add new forum topic" found under discussion boards (upper left corner 

    Best

  • Grinder
    Grinder Member Posts: 487 Member
    RobLee point

    "Could my cancer return someday?  Quite possibly, but it would have to be due to micromets that had already entered my bloodstream before the surgery, and radiation would have missed that too."

     I take a bit of comfort from that, RobLee, oddly enough.

    Since my PSA has been undectectable, any thing that shows up in the future is most likely escaped micromets that would have gone untreated no matter what form of treatment I chose at the time. 

    Thank you for pointing that out. It's another reassurance that I made the best decision possible for my circumstance.

  • Steve1961
    Steve1961 Member Posts: 505 Member
    Quick question

    A lot of you are very sharp about PC .li always mean to,ask the dr and seem to forget ..anyone know what is considered a small medium or large tumor in the prostrate .i have looked bit can’t seems to find anything ..like for instance is a 7 mm. Tumor  considered small or large just wondering because it does seem to make a difference what size the tumor is 

  • Old-timer
    Old-timer Member Posts: 196

    RN4answer,

    Please start a new thread, and I will give you my PC "history": 27 years of recurrances and treatments. Still going at age 92.                      

    Best wishes to you.

    Old-timer (Jerry)

  • MK1965
    MK1965 Member Posts: 233 Member
    Steve1961 said:

    Quick question

    A lot of you are very sharp about PC .li always mean to,ask the dr and seem to forget ..anyone know what is considered a small medium or large tumor in the prostrate .i have looked bit can’t seems to find anything ..like for instance is a 7 mm. Tumor  considered small or large just wondering because it does seem to make a difference what size the tumor is 

    Size of tumor

    From what I know, anything below 5 mm is considered small.

    MK

  • Steve1961
    Steve1961 Member Posts: 505 Member
    edited April 2018 #172
    I little more knowledge

    can one have RP after radiation treatment ,,,answer is YES at UCSF they do ..BUTTT according to dr  carroll they don’t go right to surgury ..stato have shown the reoccurance of pc after radiation usually show up back in the Prostate and usually very small. And can be watched or can have a number of other treatment as well such as active survailance cyo therapy focal and more,....and incontinance and ed are much  more higher risk ....

  • Steve1961
    Steve1961 Member Posts: 505 Member
    Unsuccessful surgury

    is a site or dors Anyone know what % of RPs down over the last 10 years Have been unsuccessful..I flat out just asked my dr out of the 4000 he has done being both open and RP what % of them have failed .....hope I will get and honest answer 

  • Grinder
    Grinder Member Posts: 487 Member
    ratings

    Here is one site that rates surgeons and hospitals...

    https://www.checkbook.org/surgeonratings/

    You can click on Prostatectomy, but it may not make a distinction between open, laparoscopic, and robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy.

    I used Surgeons Scorecard, but it has not been updated since 2015...

    https://projects.propublica.org/surgeons/

  • Grinder
    Grinder Member Posts: 487 Member
    can

    You are opening quite the can of worms on this site, Steve. Everyone here can come up with stats to support their own perspective. I quoted AARP stats recently simply because they are not in the business of prostate treatments so they don't have a bias toward a particilar treatment. Currently, and unfortunately, bias in favor of a particular treatment is causing skewed data, hidden variables, and prejudiced outcomes.

    I assume that by "successful", you mean minimal side effects. 

    I could post those stats, and point out the relevant variables in other research posted here... but then I will be regarded as a hate monger and a scoundrel, so why bother? 

    As for your own surgeon there is a site that has been listing side effect occurrence rates for individual doctors and hospitals... I will look it up momentarily.

  • Steve1961
    Steve1961 Member Posts: 505 Member
    Thanks

    either brachytherapy and 25 EBR or yank it ..can’t believe it’s this tough ..one surgeon straight up talked me out of it ...another said I should look into radition , ,the third said surgury is the only way period I’m not a candidate fir radition it won’t work ..the fourth surgeon recommended surgry but went on to explain radition and what I should do if I chose it and then said he would be ok with either .and there was no preferred method .....i really wanted this last surgeon to no you shouldn’t do it or yes you should because in the long run talking 15 to 20 surgury has better stats fir no reoccurance..but he didn’t ...so it’s up to me .....and it’s tough ...

  • Steve1961
    Steve1961 Member Posts: 505 Member
    Grinder said:

    can

    You are opening quite the can of worms on this site, Steve. Everyone here can come up with stats to support their own perspective. I quoted AARP stats recently simply because they are not in the business of prostate treatments so they don't have a bias toward a particilar treatment. Currently, and unfortunately, bias in favor of a particular treatment is causing skewed data, hidden variables, and prejudiced outcomes.

    I assume that by "successful", you mean minimal side effects. 

    I could post those stats, and point out the relevant variables in other research posted here... but then I will be regarded as a hate monger and a scoundrel, so why bother? 

    As for your own surgeon there is a site that has been listing side effect occurrence rates for individual doctors and hospitals... I will look it up momentarily.

    Successful

    I mean no reoccurance 

  • Clevelandguy
    Clevelandguy Member Posts: 999 Member
    Your choice

    Hi Steve,

    Yes it has to be your decison and only yours.  The people on this board can only provide you with reference material plus our own experiences but in the end it's up to you.  In my opinion surgery or radiation will provide good results and hopefully a long lasting cancer free life.  No guarantee's in anything we do in life, just have to go with the best  researched choice and hope for the best.  With possible PNI as you stated in one of your earlier posts I would not wait too long to make a decision.  Don't want the cancer to escape, that can get pretty bad.  As to your question about urine flow after surgery, after they took my catheter out I could piss like a fifteen year old again.  Very good flow, what a feeling.

    Let us know how it turned out, hopefully we will be hearing from you for many years to come.

    Dave 3+4

  • Grinder
    Grinder Member Posts: 487 Member
    If

    How is your spiritual life, Steve?

    If you are "in Christ" I can give you this comfort in making your decision...

    "And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose." ...Romans 8

    So whatever decision you make, God can make even what seems a disaster into something good. Ask anyone here with thecsame experience, I have seen it happen many times. Life often sucks, but sometimes something good comes out of nowhere to make it worth all the pain. I dont mean parting of the Red Sea type miracles, or televangelist faith healings... but something "good" that makes life a fascinating journey again.

    If you are a Buddhist, you need to separate your emotions from your decision making. Its hard to do, but it takes mental discipline to focus on your objectives and find that path that best gets you to those objectives.

    And, whatever religion you do, you can always pray.  I am guessing that is pretty obvious, but we dont always think about it in times of crisis. Even something simple like "God, I have no idea what  path to take here, please help me make the best decision, and help me live with the consequences, in Jesus' name" or something like that , depending what faith yiu follow.

    Now I'm going to say something crazy here so fasten your seat belts... You may want to check into the "moral impetus" of your surgeon/ radiologist. I was also dealing with several doctors and opinions... I finally settled on advice from the guy I thought was most in line with my moral impetus. By that I mean, what moral standard governs his behavior? If you run the gamut between Mother Teresa and a used car salesman, you would probably trust Mother Teresa to give you advice thats best for you, but the used car salesman is giving you advice best for his own sales volume and the opportunity to regale his buddies about the schmuck he just sold a lemon to. 

    Personally, I would not see a urologist that attended the First Church of Satan. Or a radiologist that attended  the Temple of the Holy Ganja Weed.  That's my opinion anyway... you can draw your own conclusions.

  • Steve1961
    Steve1961 Member Posts: 505 Member
    Thanks

    yes I pray a lot ,but since only 15% of men are high risk I am not feeling to lucky ..the longer I wait the more Chance it can leak out ..god has made me wait to see this last dr for s reason ...to get this test ..I think god knew I was meaning towards radiation ..without this test I would hsve had inferior treatment ..but maybe now he is telling me not to wait ad well ...rsdition treatment st UCSF won’t be until June 25th can u believe that Stanford said they can start may 16 but their way of doing it is different .i hsve surgury scheduled for may 30..I know waiting another month for radiation doesn’t seem long but I was diagnosed 5 months ago ....that to me is a long time ...I went fir PSA test yesterday ..I whstever my PSA is st will help us decide ..also if I do surgury and it retirns after 4 or 5 years I could do salvage radition but if I have radiation now I don’t think I condo it again in 4 years ,then what hormone pills the rest of my life ..wow that wouldn’t be good ,maybe I an panicking but I need to think about all these outcomes ..thanks everyone 

  • Steve1961
    Steve1961 Member Posts: 505 Member
    PSA

    I just had a PSA test yesterday results in...I have gone from starting in October from 8.6 to 8.1 7.7 and to 7.0 ....hope fully this beast is just taking a siesta while I make my decision how to chop off his ugly head ....I mean it dropping can’t be a bad thing ....thanks everyone ... should be receiving phone calls from surgeon at Stanford today ...many questions ..like one radiol told me hold their feet to the fire and demand answers ..which I am doing thanks to all you wonderful people and your wisdom and encouragement....hope I am not feeling like a hypochondriac to any one ....they are alL practicing medicine I don’t want  to be one of their bad statistics .