CSN Login
Members Online: 10

Back to Unclassified status

NewDay's picture
NewDay
Posts: 166
Joined: May 2012

Got a copy of my pathology report Size: 9cm x 8cm x 4cm Stage: pT2a Grade: IV Type: Renal cell carcinoma, unclassified. ("does not have the typical histopathologic features either of a clear cell, papillary or chromophobe subtype, nor are there sarcomatoid areas".) Necrosis over 30 - 40% of tumor. Possibly invades the renal sinus fat ------ I would be interested in anything anybody knows about "unclassified" RCC. Also, I asked the doc why he didn't remove any lymph nodes, but I'm thinking I must be remembering the answer wrong because it doesn't make sense to me, but it was the day after surgery and I was still pretty doped up. I thought he said he didn't see any. Does that make any sense? Thanks for any help --Kathy

MDCinSC's picture
MDCinSC
Posts: 574
Joined: Feb 2013

Thats what we like to hear!

garym's picture
garym
Posts: 1651
Joined: Nov 2009

May you and NED spend many, many years together!!!

Darron's picture
Darron
Posts: 217
Joined: Jun 2013

When I went from Urologist to Oncologist, all my information went wih me, including the slides of my tumor. It re-examined to clarify one or two area of the report. No additional treatment is a great thing, the common response we always hear is "we got it all". With clear margins,that is the catch phrase used, and yes, the feeling of "shouldn't I do more" is the exact thought I had when I heard those words. 

Side note, I went to my oncologist looking for a potential trial thinking I was cancer free. My oncogist saw a tumor in the report that my urologist completely overlooked. I believe the trial I was looking into was the Eveest Trial. Even if you do not do a trial, an oncologist that specializes is RCC is a good idea in my opinion. It is a good 2nd set of eyes on the reports, and if you do ever need more treatment, you will already have a doctor you are comfortable with.

I also agree about the lymph nodes. If they were not taken, they were not observed to have evidence of cancer, a good thing.

Here is what google had on the Everst trial, looks like they are still recruiting.

clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01120249
 

Sep 11, 2012 - PURPOSE: This phase III trial is studying everolimus to see how ... Official Title: EVEREST: EVErolimus for Renal CancerEnsuing Surgical Therapy, A Phase III Study ...

 

Texas_wedge's picture
Texas_wedge
Posts: 2807
Joined: Nov 2011

Darron, you're already a good contributor but still a newcomer, so a quick heads-up. There's just about nothing you can teach Kathy about any of this.  We helped to persuade her, what seems like aeons ago, to seek a further expert opinion (and even more, if necessary) in her very rare pathology and circumstances.  (She is an unusually intriguing case of great interest at an academic level as well a a challenging patient when it comes to treatment.)

You've been caught out, like many others of us here, by not noticing the date of a post. The post you've responded to was exactly a year ago!  CSN has actually, inadvertently, exacerbated the problem by adopting the presentational feature of repeating, at the head of each new page of a thread, the text of the opening posting - making it extra easy to slip up. (Michael's familiar WOOOOO  HOOOOO! message was in response to Kathy's on the previous page.)

MDCinSC's picture
MDCinSC
Posts: 574
Joined: Feb 2013

LOL!  Thanks TW!

As I said many times, I'm nothing if I'm not enthusiastic!

 

Subscribe with RSS
About Cancer Society

The content on this site is for informational purposes only. It is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Do not use this information to diagnose or treat a health problem or disease without consulting with a qualified healthcare provider. Please consult your healthcare provider with any questions or concerns you may have regarding your condition. Use of this online service is subject to the disclaimer and the terms and conditions.

Copyright 2000-2014 © Cancer Survivors Network