chemo or not?

Options
jjaj133
jjaj133 Member Posts: 867 Member
Hi everyone. I am home from the follow up appt. with the surgeon.(surgery was 5/24) Healing is going well. In 2 months I go back for bloodwork and ct. Pretty typical.
Now when we first spoke with the surgeon he said he saw no reason for chemo after. I had it before and it came back. NOW, he wants me to see an onc. to talk about the possible need for chemo. he told me it was a mucinous tumor with a fair margin. I looked up mucinous and just don't get what it is saying. can someone break it down for me??
Thanks for any help.
Judy

Comments

  • PhillieG
    PhillieG Member Posts: 4,866 Member
    Options
    Hi Judy
    "The term "mucinous" means that something has a lot of mucus. Adenocarcinomas that are comprised of at least 60 percent mucus are referred to as mucinous adenocarcinomas.

    Scientists think that the presence of mucus allows cancer cells to spread faster. As a result, mucinous adenocarcinomas are considered more aggressive than regular adenocarcinomas and are harder to successfully treat. Mucinous adenocarcinomas account for about 10-15 percent of all adenocarcinomas."
    ~from here

    I took a look at your profile and it seems you've been down this road before. Do you mean the first time you spoke with your surgeon was before you had the operation and he said chemo won't be needed. Now that you had the operation, he's rethinking that decision?

    Sounds like you've done chemo so you know what you're potentially up against.
    -phil
  • jjaj133
    jjaj133 Member Posts: 867 Member
    Options
    PhillieG said:

    Hi Judy
    "The term "mucinous" means that something has a lot of mucus. Adenocarcinomas that are comprised of at least 60 percent mucus are referred to as mucinous adenocarcinomas.

    Scientists think that the presence of mucus allows cancer cells to spread faster. As a result, mucinous adenocarcinomas are considered more aggressive than regular adenocarcinomas and are harder to successfully treat. Mucinous adenocarcinomas account for about 10-15 percent of all adenocarcinomas."
    ~from here

    I took a look at your profile and it seems you've been down this road before. Do you mean the first time you spoke with your surgeon was before you had the operation and he said chemo won't be needed. Now that you had the operation, he's rethinking that decision?

    Sounds like you've done chemo so you know what you're potentially up against.
    -phil

    thanks Phil. Yes, he is
    thanks Phil. Yes, he is rethinking. Now he doesn't want to influence my decision. My guess is that because it's mucinous he has changed his mind. The PA asked him if i should see the onc. in 2 month. he said no, that might be too late. so I think i am in for the chemo again. Crap!
    Thanks for your help.
    Judy
  • PhillieG
    PhillieG Member Posts: 4,866 Member
    Options
    jjaj133 said:

    thanks Phil. Yes, he is
    thanks Phil. Yes, he is rethinking. Now he doesn't want to influence my decision. My guess is that because it's mucinous he has changed his mind. The PA asked him if i should see the onc. in 2 month. he said no, that might be too late. so I think i am in for the chemo again. Crap!
    Thanks for your help.
    Judy

    Hi Judy
    There are many on this site who go a more natural route.
    Maybe they will chime in with some alternative suggestions...
    I know the chemo is not fun at all.
    -phil
  • John23
    John23 Member Posts: 2,122 Member
    Options
    jjaj133 said:

    thanks Phil. Yes, he is
    thanks Phil. Yes, he is rethinking. Now he doesn't want to influence my decision. My guess is that because it's mucinous he has changed his mind. The PA asked him if i should see the onc. in 2 month. he said no, that might be too late. so I think i am in for the chemo again. Crap!
    Thanks for your help.
    Judy

    Judy -

    Like Phil said, we're all different.

    I'm a bit more of a realist than most, and when I read "statistics",
    I don't take some contorted bunch of "feel good" numbers to
    the bank. Most all of the "grim" statistics are accurate, and have
    not changed in over 40 years. Of course, no-one wants to believe
    that, and jumps on the cancer industry's bandwagon immediately.

    The fact is, Judy, that you most likely would have had that recurrence
    even if you did "chemo" the last time around. Chemo -is not- the
    guarantee you're looking for; it carries no guarantees, and never did.

    That said..... Chemo and radiation has it's place in medical science,
    and can work well when prescribed properly. Phil has battled
    this crap for a long time, and his excellent physicians seem to know
    exactly how much and how soon treatments are made, and when
    they should stop. He's done so well, that if I find the absolute need
    to go the chemo route, I'll get his physicians' numbers.

    I was diagnosed as a "3c, or 4." back in 2006. I decided to accept
    the "3c". After a major surgery to relieve an intestinal blockage
    this past January, I learned that I have been a 4 since 2006.

    I don't know if it helped to kid myself, but that's the facts.

    I -did not- do chemical therapy or radiation. Instead, I researched
    and used imported medicinal strength Chinese herbs that are well
    known to address cancer cells specifically.

    There are many "alternatives" to try, if you have the courage to try
    them. And, there are many here on this board, that would be more
    than happy to share their experiences with you, if you find yourself
    that interested.

    Nothing works for "everyone". Some of us don't seem to do well
    no matter what we do, while others have great luck sticking to
    a White Castle Hamburger diet.

    For me, Judy, I'm now headed into rougher seas. I've had an
    Ileostomy since 2006 (meaning: no colon), and this year they
    removed 1/2 of my small intestine in the attempt to resolve
    the obstruction. Consequently, I now have what is called the
    "short bowel syndrome". What that is, is the lack of enough
    intestine to properly absorb liquids, nutrients, vitamins, etc.

    The bottom line is, that things like "juicing" (for me) causes a
    faster transit of product, and the resulting loss of any serious
    absorption. My herbal broths are equally hitting the skids for
    the same reason.

    So what may have saved me before, may have absolutely no
    effective use now.

    That's what life is all about! I could have done chemo back in
    2006, but the end result would be no different. Well... except
    I might have had all the neurological problems associated with
    chemo, etc...

    The herbs managed to keep me in damned good health for quite
    a while, but adhesions and hernias prevail for anyone that's had
    major abdominal surgery, and all too often it broad-sides those
    that aren't aware of all those other issues that we have to go through.

    By the way, it can take a long time before an adhesion or hernia
    presents a calamity, so no-one should ever let their guard down!

    To do chemo or not? I chose not to, since statistically it would
    have only provided a 2% benefit over doing absolutely nothing.
    Even one Onco said, that at 6 months post surgery, the chances
    of doing anything of benefit were slim.

    Study the -real- facts and the -real- statistics, and don't allow
    yourself to be frightened into submission. Take your time, and
    make your choices as well informed as you can!

    No one should tell you what path is best, only your own instincts
    for self-preservation; your basic intuition, should be your guide!

    Be well !!

    John
  • jjaj133
    jjaj133 Member Posts: 867 Member
    Options
    John23 said:

    Judy -

    Like Phil said, we're all different.

    I'm a bit more of a realist than most, and when I read "statistics",
    I don't take some contorted bunch of "feel good" numbers to
    the bank. Most all of the "grim" statistics are accurate, and have
    not changed in over 40 years. Of course, no-one wants to believe
    that, and jumps on the cancer industry's bandwagon immediately.

    The fact is, Judy, that you most likely would have had that recurrence
    even if you did "chemo" the last time around. Chemo -is not- the
    guarantee you're looking for; it carries no guarantees, and never did.

    That said..... Chemo and radiation has it's place in medical science,
    and can work well when prescribed properly. Phil has battled
    this crap for a long time, and his excellent physicians seem to know
    exactly how much and how soon treatments are made, and when
    they should stop. He's done so well, that if I find the absolute need
    to go the chemo route, I'll get his physicians' numbers.

    I was diagnosed as a "3c, or 4." back in 2006. I decided to accept
    the "3c". After a major surgery to relieve an intestinal blockage
    this past January, I learned that I have been a 4 since 2006.

    I don't know if it helped to kid myself, but that's the facts.

    I -did not- do chemical therapy or radiation. Instead, I researched
    and used imported medicinal strength Chinese herbs that are well
    known to address cancer cells specifically.

    There are many "alternatives" to try, if you have the courage to try
    them. And, there are many here on this board, that would be more
    than happy to share their experiences with you, if you find yourself
    that interested.

    Nothing works for "everyone". Some of us don't seem to do well
    no matter what we do, while others have great luck sticking to
    a White Castle Hamburger diet.

    For me, Judy, I'm now headed into rougher seas. I've had an
    Ileostomy since 2006 (meaning: no colon), and this year they
    removed 1/2 of my small intestine in the attempt to resolve
    the obstruction. Consequently, I now have what is called the
    "short bowel syndrome". What that is, is the lack of enough
    intestine to properly absorb liquids, nutrients, vitamins, etc.

    The bottom line is, that things like "juicing" (for me) causes a
    faster transit of product, and the resulting loss of any serious
    absorption. My herbal broths are equally hitting the skids for
    the same reason.

    So what may have saved me before, may have absolutely no
    effective use now.

    That's what life is all about! I could have done chemo back in
    2006, but the end result would be no different. Well... except
    I might have had all the neurological problems associated with
    chemo, etc...

    The herbs managed to keep me in damned good health for quite
    a while, but adhesions and hernias prevail for anyone that's had
    major abdominal surgery, and all too often it broad-sides those
    that aren't aware of all those other issues that we have to go through.

    By the way, it can take a long time before an adhesion or hernia
    presents a calamity, so no-one should ever let their guard down!

    To do chemo or not? I chose not to, since statistically it would
    have only provided a 2% benefit over doing absolutely nothing.
    Even one Onco said, that at 6 months post surgery, the chances
    of doing anything of benefit were slim.

    Study the -real- facts and the -real- statistics, and don't allow
    yourself to be frightened into submission. Take your time, and
    make your choices as well informed as you can!

    No one should tell you what path is best, only your own instincts
    for self-preservation; your basic intuition, should be your guide!

    Be well !!

    John

    Thank you John, I appreciate
    Thank you John, I appreciate your input. I have to admit, i am afraid of alternative medicine. I plan on doing more research before I talk to the onc. Today i feel like I am damned if i do & damned if i don't. I guess it's a matter of finally accepting reality.
    I logically know there are no guarantees, but i still would like one! ; )
    Good luck to you John.
    Judy
  • PhillieG
    PhillieG Member Posts: 4,866 Member
    Options
    John23 said:

    Judy -

    Like Phil said, we're all different.

    I'm a bit more of a realist than most, and when I read "statistics",
    I don't take some contorted bunch of "feel good" numbers to
    the bank. Most all of the "grim" statistics are accurate, and have
    not changed in over 40 years. Of course, no-one wants to believe
    that, and jumps on the cancer industry's bandwagon immediately.

    The fact is, Judy, that you most likely would have had that recurrence
    even if you did "chemo" the last time around. Chemo -is not- the
    guarantee you're looking for; it carries no guarantees, and never did.

    That said..... Chemo and radiation has it's place in medical science,
    and can work well when prescribed properly. Phil has battled
    this crap for a long time, and his excellent physicians seem to know
    exactly how much and how soon treatments are made, and when
    they should stop. He's done so well, that if I find the absolute need
    to go the chemo route, I'll get his physicians' numbers.

    I was diagnosed as a "3c, or 4." back in 2006. I decided to accept
    the "3c". After a major surgery to relieve an intestinal blockage
    this past January, I learned that I have been a 4 since 2006.

    I don't know if it helped to kid myself, but that's the facts.

    I -did not- do chemical therapy or radiation. Instead, I researched
    and used imported medicinal strength Chinese herbs that are well
    known to address cancer cells specifically.

    There are many "alternatives" to try, if you have the courage to try
    them. And, there are many here on this board, that would be more
    than happy to share their experiences with you, if you find yourself
    that interested.

    Nothing works for "everyone". Some of us don't seem to do well
    no matter what we do, while others have great luck sticking to
    a White Castle Hamburger diet.

    For me, Judy, I'm now headed into rougher seas. I've had an
    Ileostomy since 2006 (meaning: no colon), and this year they
    removed 1/2 of my small intestine in the attempt to resolve
    the obstruction. Consequently, I now have what is called the
    "short bowel syndrome". What that is, is the lack of enough
    intestine to properly absorb liquids, nutrients, vitamins, etc.

    The bottom line is, that things like "juicing" (for me) causes a
    faster transit of product, and the resulting loss of any serious
    absorption. My herbal broths are equally hitting the skids for
    the same reason.

    So what may have saved me before, may have absolutely no
    effective use now.

    That's what life is all about! I could have done chemo back in
    2006, but the end result would be no different. Well... except
    I might have had all the neurological problems associated with
    chemo, etc...

    The herbs managed to keep me in damned good health for quite
    a while, but adhesions and hernias prevail for anyone that's had
    major abdominal surgery, and all too often it broad-sides those
    that aren't aware of all those other issues that we have to go through.

    By the way, it can take a long time before an adhesion or hernia
    presents a calamity, so no-one should ever let their guard down!

    To do chemo or not? I chose not to, since statistically it would
    have only provided a 2% benefit over doing absolutely nothing.
    Even one Onco said, that at 6 months post surgery, the chances
    of doing anything of benefit were slim.

    Study the -real- facts and the -real- statistics, and don't allow
    yourself to be frightened into submission. Take your time, and
    make your choices as well informed as you can!

    No one should tell you what path is best, only your own instincts
    for self-preservation; your basic intuition, should be your guide!

    Be well !!

    John

    Advances in Care
    I just wanted to point out that in the past 7 years that I've been dealing with Stage IV CC, there have been 2 major advances in cancer therapies (Avastin and Erbitux) that I believe saved my life. If they had not been developed and I got cancer 10 years ago I seriously doubt I'd be here today.

    So I question your statement John that "Most all of the "grim" statistics are accurate, and have not changed in over 40 years."
    Maybe the "statistics" are the same but the my survival was affected in a positive way I believe...

    No one knows for sure what might have happened if we chose alternate treatments than we did. Maybe if I did TCM I'd be cured, maybe I would be the opposite. We don't know since we didn't do them, we can only guess at best.
    -phil