Nivolumab Update - Birthday Scan Results

2

Comments

  • johns son
    johns son Member Posts: 12
    Frank302 said:

    Right you are fox

    My Dr. is so convinced that Nivolumab is the real deal that he plans to take me off it as soon as it is approved and then just monitor how I am doing and then if the cancer ever comes back retreat with Nivolumab .

    I want to see this drug approved for everyone ASAP !

    It's such an easy treatment to take with very minimal side effects . And it's effect on my own RCC is astonishing .

    This is my experience with this treatment . After loseing my left kidney I was found to have two tumors . One in left lung , one in abdomin and lymph nodes were hinky . Tried Sutent alone for six months . It didn't help me . I started Nivolumab on Dec. 8 ' 2011 . The day before my birthday . I went back six weeks later for a ct scan . Both tumors were still growing especially the one in my abdomin . Probably due to all those years of clean living and exercise . Went back in six weeks for another scan . Lung tumor about the same size , abdominal tumor bigger yet . It must have been pumping iron .

    I went home convinced Nivolumab was not going to work for me .

    The following week I went to bed one night experienceing the the usual pain in my lower back . Took Oxycontin planning to wake up and take more as needed during the night . I slept through the night for the first time in months . The next morning the pain was completely gone . As though it had never existed . I was not about to start celebrating because I figured the tumor had probably just grown so big and bad that it had destroyed the nerves and I couldn't feel the pain anymore .

    With my next scan all signs of cancer were completely gone . I went from hearing " Your tumors are still growing " to hearing " Your tumors are completly gone " in six weeks time .

    I really want to see Nivolumab approved . I hate to think that it could be helping so many people and they just can't get it yet .

    Congrads

    Wish you well, and enjoy that drink!

  • texMD
    texMD Member Posts: 13
    Frank302 said:

    Right you are fox

    My Dr. is so convinced that Nivolumab is the real deal that he plans to take me off it as soon as it is approved and then just monitor how I am doing and then if the cancer ever comes back retreat with Nivolumab .

    I want to see this drug approved for everyone ASAP !

    It's such an easy treatment to take with very minimal side effects . And it's effect on my own RCC is astonishing .

    This is my experience with this treatment . After loseing my left kidney I was found to have two tumors . One in left lung , one in abdomin and lymph nodes were hinky . Tried Sutent alone for six months . It didn't help me . I started Nivolumab on Dec. 8 ' 2011 . The day before my birthday . I went back six weeks later for a ct scan . Both tumors were still growing especially the one in my abdomin . Probably due to all those years of clean living and exercise . Went back in six weeks for another scan . Lung tumor about the same size , abdominal tumor bigger yet . It must have been pumping iron .

    I went home convinced Nivolumab was not going to work for me .

    The following week I went to bed one night experienceing the the usual pain in my lower back . Took Oxycontin planning to wake up and take more as needed during the night . I slept through the night for the first time in months . The next morning the pain was completely gone . As though it had never existed . I was not about to start celebrating because I figured the tumor had probably just grown so big and bad that it had destroyed the nerves and I couldn't feel the pain anymore .

    With my next scan all signs of cancer were completely gone . I went from hearing " Your tumors are still growing " to hearing " Your tumors are completly gone " in six weeks time .

    I really want to see Nivolumab approved . I hate to think that it could be helping so many people and they just can't get it yet .

    Fantastic

    Great news!  My wife just started the nivolumab arm in the checkmate trial.  So happy we got this drug given the promising results.  Frank --  I'm curious about your experience. You initially progressed on nivolumab -- what was your doc's rationale for continuing treatment after 2 consecutive scans?  I'm glad you stayed on it(!!) but wonder what would define failure after 12 weeks of growth.  My wife's my first scan is at 8 weeks (she'll have 4 infusions by then) and I was under the assumption we'd know at that point if it's working or not.  Also did you (or anyone else with positive results with nivolumab) have sarcomatoid features?  

  • Darron
    Darron Member Posts: 310 Member
    texMD said:

    Fantastic

    Great news!  My wife just started the nivolumab arm in the checkmate trial.  So happy we got this drug given the promising results.  Frank --  I'm curious about your experience. You initially progressed on nivolumab -- what was your doc's rationale for continuing treatment after 2 consecutive scans?  I'm glad you stayed on it(!!) but wonder what would define failure after 12 weeks of growth.  My wife's my first scan is at 8 weeks (she'll have 4 infusions by then) and I was under the assumption we'd know at that point if it's working or not.  Also did you (or anyone else with positive results with nivolumab) have sarcomatoid features?  

    Slight growth

    my scan results are in my bio, but I had 12% growth on my 1st scan. the scan showed signs of cell death on the inside of the tumor. I think 15% growth was the threshold for being kicked out of the trial. on that scan, the doctor saw it as good news and we felt it was mixed news because of the size change, but it was basically swelling from T-cells attacking and killing it. my doctor was spot on in predicting just about all of my scans.

    Don't be alarmed if there is small growth the 1st scan ask them if there  are signs of cell necrosis .

    best of luck on the trial. Is your wife taking anything else with Nicolumab?

  • Frank302
    Frank302 Member Posts: 71
    texMD said:

    Fantastic

    Great news!  My wife just started the nivolumab arm in the checkmate trial.  So happy we got this drug given the promising results.  Frank --  I'm curious about your experience. You initially progressed on nivolumab -- what was your doc's rationale for continuing treatment after 2 consecutive scans?  I'm glad you stayed on it(!!) but wonder what would define failure after 12 weeks of growth.  My wife's my first scan is at 8 weeks (she'll have 4 infusions by then) and I was under the assumption we'd know at that point if it's working or not.  Also did you (or anyone else with positive results with nivolumab) have sarcomatoid features?  

    Continueing treatment

    My doctor's thinking in keeping me on Nivolumab is , if it ain't broke , don't fix it . Because Nivolumab has not yet been approved if I stopped Nivolumab and cancer returned I would not be able to go back on it because I would have dropped out of the trial . Once it is approved I can stop taking it and if cancer recurs I will be able to start taking it again . Since my cancer was stage four and agressive why tank the chance ? Once my cancer was gone if there had been any recurrence I would be out of the trial . I'm in the phase 2 dose ranging trial . Next week I get my 25th scan and 36th infusion . Since side effects , at least for me  ,have been a breeze I'm more than happy to take it for the rest of my life if need be .

    If this isn't real clear , forgive me . I'm not fully awake yet .

    Don't be overly alarmed if your wife sees no improvment  for the first several scans . It seems that Nivolumab takes awhile to start  working but once it kicks in results are dramatic .

    Wishing for the best possible outcome for you .

  • foxhd
    foxhd Member Posts: 3,181 Member
    Frank302 said:

    Continueing treatment

    My doctor's thinking in keeping me on Nivolumab is , if it ain't broke , don't fix it . Because Nivolumab has not yet been approved if I stopped Nivolumab and cancer returned I would not be able to go back on it because I would have dropped out of the trial . Once it is approved I can stop taking it and if cancer recurs I will be able to start taking it again . Since my cancer was stage four and agressive why tank the chance ? Once my cancer was gone if there had been any recurrence I would be out of the trial . I'm in the phase 2 dose ranging trial . Next week I get my 25th scan and 36th infusion . Since side effects , at least for me  ,have been a breeze I'm more than happy to take it for the rest of my life if need be .

    If this isn't real clear , forgive me . I'm not fully awake yet .

    Don't be overly alarmed if your wife sees no improvment  for the first several scans . It seems that Nivolumab takes awhile to start  working but once it kicks in results are dramatic .

    Wishing for the best possible outcome for you .

    I thought

    That I would have been in your boat , Frank.  I was more than willing to stay on nivolumab for life. Must admit I'm a little jealous. I was still in a phase one trial. Protocols were different. I was told that earlier participants were bumped from the trial because of swelling and inflammation of tumors. Then they decided that the swelling and inflammation were a good sign. When I got bumped it was because of new tumor growth. Now my trial protocol has allowed for some new growth. But too late for me. I am SO happy so many people are now on nivolumab and are doing well. Proud to have been a part of it.

  • Frank302
    Frank302 Member Posts: 71
    foxhd said:

    I thought

    That I would have been in your boat , Frank.  I was more than willing to stay on nivolumab for life. Must admit I'm a little jealous. I was still in a phase one trial. Protocols were different. I was told that earlier participants were bumped from the trial because of swelling and inflammation of tumors. Then they decided that the swelling and inflammation were a good sign. When I got bumped it was because of new tumor growth. Now my trial protocol has allowed for some new growth. But too late for me. I am SO happy so many people are now on nivolumab and are doing well. Proud to have been a part of it.

    fox ,I know exactly where you're coming from bud

    The protocols are all in favor of the trial and us guinie pigs have to take what we get . It ain't good , it ain't right and it's a darn stinkin' shame . I hope to God they get this stuff approved soon . I've heard mention of late this year or early next year . I wish it could be today .

  • Peggyz
    Peggyz Member Posts: 10
    Frank302 said:

    Right you are fox

    My Dr. is so convinced that Nivolumab is the real deal that he plans to take me off it as soon as it is approved and then just monitor how I am doing and then if the cancer ever comes back retreat with Nivolumab .

    I want to see this drug approved for everyone ASAP !

    It's such an easy treatment to take with very minimal side effects . And it's effect on my own RCC is astonishing .

    This is my experience with this treatment . After loseing my left kidney I was found to have two tumors . One in left lung , one in abdomin and lymph nodes were hinky . Tried Sutent alone for six months . It didn't help me . I started Nivolumab on Dec. 8 ' 2011 . The day before my birthday . I went back six weeks later for a ct scan . Both tumors were still growing especially the one in my abdomin . Probably due to all those years of clean living and exercise . Went back in six weeks for another scan . Lung tumor about the same size , abdominal tumor bigger yet . It must have been pumping iron .

    I went home convinced Nivolumab was not going to work for me .

    The following week I went to bed one night experienceing the the usual pain in my lower back . Took Oxycontin planning to wake up and take more as needed during the night . I slept through the night for the first time in months . The next morning the pain was completely gone . As though it had never existed . I was not about to start celebrating because I figured the tumor had probably just grown so big and bad that it had destroyed the nerves and I couldn't feel the pain anymore .

    With my next scan all signs of cancer were completely gone . I went from hearing " Your tumors are still growing " to hearing " Your tumors are completly gone " in six weeks time .

    I really want to see Nivolumab approved . I hate to think that it could be helping so many people and they just can't get it yet .

    going off a successful treatment?

    Frank, I am confused to hear you say that your doctor would take you off Nivolumab once it is approved; assume that means you are in  a clinical currently getting it.  Are you on some maintainence use of it?  If the cancer is gone, thanks to Nivolumab, or at least invisible to the CT scans, how long would you continue to take it to wipe up any unseen mets?  I would be concerned that something could start up suddenly.  Love to hear more about this approach.

    Of course, I am thrilled to think there is another drug in the arsenal, but want to understand the usage issue.

    Peggy

  • Peggyz
    Peggyz Member Posts: 10
    Frank302 said:

    fox ,I know exactly where you're coming from bud

    The protocols are all in favor of the trial and us guinie pigs have to take what we get . It ain't good , it ain't right and it's a darn stinkin' shame . I hope to God they get this stuff approved soon . I've heard mention of late this year or early next year . I wish it could be today .

    Additional questions: what type of RCC do you/did you have?  What was the pathology, and how did you choose this trial?  Is this with Nivolumab alone or in combination with other drugs?  Did you have nephrectomy, and at what stage were you diagnosed?

  • Frank302
    Frank302 Member Posts: 71
    Peggyz said:

    going off a successful treatment?

    Frank, I am confused to hear you say that your doctor would take you off Nivolumab once it is approved; assume that means you are in  a clinical currently getting it.  Are you on some maintainence use of it?  If the cancer is gone, thanks to Nivolumab, or at least invisible to the CT scans, how long would you continue to take it to wipe up any unseen mets?  I would be concerned that something could start up suddenly.  Love to hear more about this approach.

    Of course, I am thrilled to think there is another drug in the arsenal, but want to understand the usage issue.

    Peggy

    Hi peggy

    At this time Nivolumab has not been approved for use by the FDA . It is in the clinical trial stage . The only way to get it is to be a participant in one of the clinical trials now being conducted  as a part of the approval process .  When I signed on to be a part of the trial the agreement was that I would take the treatments until such time as the cancer  progressed when I would be dropped from the trial. My tumors completely disappeared from the ct scans after the first few treatments .They knew it would take a few treatments before Nivolumab would be effective .As far as my oncologist is concerned I no longer need the treatments because no cancer is visable on my ct scans and he has gone so far as to say that he dose not think it will return . Those are bold words coming from an oncologist specialsing in RCC . We all know how stubborn and unpredictable RCC is.  Who knows but what there might be cancer cels floating around my body just waiting for an oppurtunity to pounce ? If that were to happen then hopefully the Nivolumab would nock them out before they would show up on ct scans . That is why I continue to get the treatments . Just to be on the safe side . If I stopped taking Nivolumab today and cancer showed up in six months I would not be able to get treatments again until it is approved for use . I'm not into taking chances with cancer. I know Nivolumab has knocked the cancer down , I'm not 100% sure it has knocked it out .

    Researchers think Nivolumab has a long lasting effect against cancer even after patients stop treatment bacause it works with the immune system . It " takes the brakes off the immune system " allowing the immune system to destroy cancer cels . That is something our immune systems  will not normally do because it does not recognize cancer cels as being a threat . It is thought that our immune systems have  " memory " . Once Nivolumab has made it possible for the immune system to recognize cancer cels as a threat and to attack and destroy them the effect might last for a long time . In the same way that vacination works against smallpox or measels or chicken pox .

    After Nivolumab is approved by the FDA as a treatment for RCC my oncologist plans to stop the treatments and have me come in for regular scans in case cancer should return . I would then be able to start the treatments again because at that time Nivolumab will be available for everyone .

  • foxhd
    foxhd Member Posts: 3,181 Member
    Frank302 said:

    Hi peggy

    At this time Nivolumab has not been approved for use by the FDA . It is in the clinical trial stage . The only way to get it is to be a participant in one of the clinical trials now being conducted  as a part of the approval process .  When I signed on to be a part of the trial the agreement was that I would take the treatments until such time as the cancer  progressed when I would be dropped from the trial. My tumors completely disappeared from the ct scans after the first few treatments .They knew it would take a few treatments before Nivolumab would be effective .As far as my oncologist is concerned I no longer need the treatments because no cancer is visable on my ct scans and he has gone so far as to say that he dose not think it will return . Those are bold words coming from an oncologist specialsing in RCC . We all know how stubborn and unpredictable RCC is.  Who knows but what there might be cancer cels floating around my body just waiting for an oppurtunity to pounce ? If that were to happen then hopefully the Nivolumab would nock them out before they would show up on ct scans . That is why I continue to get the treatments . Just to be on the safe side . If I stopped taking Nivolumab today and cancer showed up in six months I would not be able to get treatments again until it is approved for use . I'm not into taking chances with cancer. I know Nivolumab has knocked the cancer down , I'm not 100% sure it has knocked it out .

    Researchers think Nivolumab has a long lasting effect against cancer even after patients stop treatment bacause it works with the immune system . It " takes the brakes off the immune system " allowing the immune system to destroy cancer cels . That is something our immune systems  will not normally do because it does not recognize cancer cels as being a threat . It is thought that our immune systems have  " memory " . Once Nivolumab has made it possible for the immune system to recognize cancer cels as a threat and to attack and destroy them the effect might last for a long time . In the same way that vacination works against smallpox or measels or chicken pox .

    After Nivolumab is approved by the FDA as a treatment for RCC my oncologist plans to stop the treatments and have me come in for regular scans in case cancer should return . I would then be able to start the treatments again because at that time Nivolumab will be available for everyone .

    Once it is approved by the FDA

    the pharmaceutical companies won't be giving it away for free. They will expect to get big bucks in return from the insurance companies. So at that time they will  most likely discontinue the "free" trials. Then it will be available for all with clear cell carcinoma. Survival rates will jump through the roof.

  • Frank302
    Frank302 Member Posts: 71
    foxhd said:

    Once it is approved by the FDA

    the pharmaceutical companies won't be giving it away for free. They will expect to get big bucks in return from the insurance companies. So at that time they will  most likely discontinue the "free" trials. Then it will be available for all with clear cell carcinoma. Survival rates will jump through the roof.

    Good point fox .
    My insurance

    Good point fox .

    My insurance has paid a huge amount in hospitol fees and all the doctors and nurses and everything else under the sun . The only thing free is the Nivolumab itself . I figure I am one of the most expensive people walking around today . Oh well I'm worth every penny .Wink

  • foxhd
    foxhd Member Posts: 3,181 Member
    Frank302 said:

    Good point fox .
    My insurance

    Good point fox .

    My insurance has paid a huge amount in hospitol fees and all the doctors and nurses and everything else under the sun . The only thing free is the Nivolumab itself . I figure I am one of the most expensive people walking around today . Oh well I'm worth every penny .Wink

    Expensive

    Thank god for insurance. Just my IL-2 treatments were about $300,000 per week!..x4! I had paid thousands for biopsies and testing that were supposed to be covered by the trial. I contested and they eventually sent the money back to me. Medical billing is more slimey than used car sales. You never know what you are paying for or the real value of the services you recieve.

  • Darron
    Darron Member Posts: 310 Member
    Peggyz said:

    Additional questions: what type of RCC do you/did you have?  What was the pathology, and how did you choose this trial?  Is this with Nivolumab alone or in combination with other drugs?  Did you have nephrectomy, and at what stage were you diagnosed?

    Pathology

    Click on my bio and there are details, 

    17 cm clear cell in right kidney. I don't have the specifics handy, but it included right adrenal and fatty tissue within the capsule. some renal vein intrusion but removed with clear margin.Radical right in Oct 2012. 3.4 cm tumor on a left adrenal and 3 mets to lungs Treated on trial.

    sutent-Nivolumab combination, started with 50 mg Sutent and Nivolumqb every 3 weeks.

    At time of trial start, option was IL-2, trial, or remove adrenal gland by surery. IL-2 scared the crap out if me and my doctor felt Nicolumab was a potential cure. He said he would have not recommended it over IL-2 unless it presented a good chance of a cure. He he had the spot in the trial now. It it didn't work, I could always do IL-2 later. He was not sure he would have a spot if I did IL-2 first.

    it was a no brained to me, I could live a normal life and have a shot at a cure. IL-2 was hospital time, disability from work and famy, and expense. It was worthodox the try.

  • Darron
    Darron Member Posts: 310 Member
    Frank302 said:

    fox ,I know exactly where you're coming from bud

    The protocols are all in favor of the trial and us guinie pigs have to take what we get . It ain't good , it ain't right and it's a darn stinkin' shame . I hope to God they get this stuff approved soon . I've heard mention of late this year or early next year . I wish it could be today .

    I disagree-franks insurance comment

    My original protocol was to be dropped from the drug as soon as there was no evidence of cancer. It it my understanding that in an effort to get correct maintenance dosing, they ammended the trial and allowed for continued dosing to get it right And figure of what the best maintenance does is for future patients.

    I hate it for guys like Fox that got kicked out. I was nearly dropped as well on two occasions for platelets and for tumor growth. Maybe it is my Doctor and his staff, but I feel they have always fought for me and what is beat fir me. The protocol must be set and followed for patient safety and accurate information. Yes, we are guinea pigs, but we chose that path.

    The change to allow for a maintenance dose tells me they know it is good stuff, let's get it right in phase I.

  • texMD
    texMD Member Posts: 13
    Darron said:

    Slight growth

    my scan results are in my bio, but I had 12% growth on my 1st scan. the scan showed signs of cell death on the inside of the tumor. I think 15% growth was the threshold for being kicked out of the trial. on that scan, the doctor saw it as good news and we felt it was mixed news because of the size change, but it was basically swelling from T-cells attacking and killing it. my doctor was spot on in predicting just about all of my scans.

    Don't be alarmed if there is small growth the 1st scan ask them if there  are signs of cell necrosis .

    best of luck on the trial. Is your wife taking anything else with Nicolumab?

    Good to know

    Thanks for the heads up regarding tumor necrosis.  She was on votrient for about 4 months and the tumor grew substantially.  I'm curious to know about others pathology.  Any one with sarcomatoid features who did well on Nivolumab?  I think approval isn't far off - at least for melanoma - and then physicians will be able to at provide infusions off-label.

  • a_oaklee
    a_oaklee Member Posts: 566 Member
    Congratulations

    Hi Darron.  I haven't been online in awhile during the holidays and new year festivities.  I am thrilled that you are NED, and my husband and I are looking forward to trying this medicine when it is available.  Thank you for all the information that you shared with all of us. 

  • one putt
    one putt Member Posts: 72
    foxhd said:

    Expensive

    Thank god for insurance. Just my IL-2 treatments were about $300,000 per week!..x4! I had paid thousands for biopsies and testing that were supposed to be covered by the trial. I contested and they eventually sent the money back to me. Medical billing is more slimey than used car sales. You never know what you are paying for or the real value of the services you recieve.

    very expensive

    Fox, I had a recent discussion with my onc about nivolumab (when you and I started it was called MDX1106) being approved and he told me one of the recently approved melanoma drugs is costing over $100,000  per infusion.  He figures nivolumab will be similarly priced. For those of you unfamiliar withmy history : rt radical neph Nov 2011, IL-2 treatment Jan 2012, nivolumab/votrient trial since May,2012.  II'm stage 4 mdx with multiple lung mets, multiple bone mets.Since teatment most lung mets gone and a total of 60% reduction in tumors since beginning my trial. In my trial  a 20% progression knocks you out of my trial. In my case my doc will probably pull me sooner if he determines I'm no longer getting any clinical benefit from it. I'm currentlythe longest responder at Hopkins in my arm of the trial. Hopefully nivolumab gets approved next year so many others can benefit from the drug that literally has changed my life.

    P.S. Fox my IL-2 treatment "only " cost $250,000 a week. I can't imagine  Hopkins gave me a discount or that they are any cheaper than New Haven so I guess we'll have to chalk it up to inflation. Stay well.

  • foxhd
    foxhd Member Posts: 3,181 Member
    one putt said:

    very expensive

    Fox, I had a recent discussion with my onc about nivolumab (when you and I started it was called MDX1106) being approved and he told me one of the recently approved melanoma drugs is costing over $100,000  per infusion.  He figures nivolumab will be similarly priced. For those of you unfamiliar withmy history : rt radical neph Nov 2011, IL-2 treatment Jan 2012, nivolumab/votrient trial since May,2012.  II'm stage 4 mdx with multiple lung mets, multiple bone mets.Since teatment most lung mets gone and a total of 60% reduction in tumors since beginning my trial. In my trial  a 20% progression knocks you out of my trial. In my case my doc will probably pull me sooner if he determines I'm no longer getting any clinical benefit from it. I'm currentlythe longest responder at Hopkins in my arm of the trial. Hopefully nivolumab gets approved next year so many others can benefit from the drug that literally has changed my life.

    P.S. Fox my IL-2 treatment "only " cost $250,000 a week. I can't imagine  Hopkins gave me a discount or that they are any cheaper than New Haven so I guess we'll have to chalk it up to inflation. Stay well.

    generic

    John, I guess you got the Wal-mart generic version. Made in China. Do you remember having to bring in a coupon? I'm glad you are still responding. I think we can live this way for another 10-20 years. It's OK with me. You can't be bitchin too much. Be good. Fox....by the way, let Alice know that I got my money back. Thanks.

  • Darron
    Darron Member Posts: 310 Member
    one putt said:

    very expensive

    Fox, I had a recent discussion with my onc about nivolumab (when you and I started it was called MDX1106) being approved and he told me one of the recently approved melanoma drugs is costing over $100,000  per infusion.  He figures nivolumab will be similarly priced. For those of you unfamiliar withmy history : rt radical neph Nov 2011, IL-2 treatment Jan 2012, nivolumab/votrient trial since May,2012.  II'm stage 4 mdx with multiple lung mets, multiple bone mets.Since teatment most lung mets gone and a total of 60% reduction in tumors since beginning my trial. In my trial  a 20% progression knocks you out of my trial. In my case my doc will probably pull me sooner if he determines I'm no longer getting any clinical benefit from it. I'm currentlythe longest responder at Hopkins in my arm of the trial. Hopefully nivolumab gets approved next year so many others can benefit from the drug that literally has changed my life.

    P.S. Fox my IL-2 treatment "only " cost $250,000 a week. I can't imagine  Hopkins gave me a discount or that they are any cheaper than New Haven so I guess we'll have to chalk it up to inflation. Stay well.

    Similar number

    I heard a very similar number for each infusion. That is a heck of a lot of money for 600 ml.

    Glad to hear you are still responding. I have a friend on the votrient arm here in Charlotte since Nov 2011. He has also seen 69-70% reduction. He was 60% on his first San and slower, but steady since then.

    Say hi to Alive for me!

  • Sunshine40
    Sunshine40 Member Posts: 1
    nivolumab

    Darron,

    Are you still on Nivolumab?  Just had sixtth infusion..doing well.