Jun 05, 2013 - 5:25 pm
As Ive explained in the past, the ultra sound said i had a 4cm x 2.5 x 2.5 renal lesion in left upper kidney.
I just picked up the CT Scan and it gives a long list of what isn't there, like lung base lesion, anatomic cardiac lesion etc etc.
But here's the kidney part:
Conclusion: (Mind you-their report screws up by saying Specifically, the renal lesion 3.0 cm (instead of 4cm)
The mass seen on ultrashound likely represents mild to moderate size extrarenal pelvis seen on CT.
Specifically, the renal lesion 3.0 cm in diameter described on the previous ultrashound is not identified by CT. It may be the left extrarenal pelvis. Cholelithiases clearly present on the abdominal ultrasound cannot be identified on the CT examination.
Has anyone had any issues with one test saying one thing and the other test saying completely different?
I don't know which result to believe now-any insight??
I don't have a follow up with my doctor until 2 weeks from today....because he's on vacation.