Sep 01, 2012 - 1:42 am
I posted awhile ago about a lump I had an ultrasound on, and it came up as suspicious, but was having a hysterectomy August 1st...so it all went on hold. Well.....I had a bilateral mammogram and another ultrasound last Wednesday, and the radiologist believes it is now just a fibroadenoma. I am 37, so this makes me a little nervous as I thought that was in under 30's, but, verrrrry relieved. However, I saw my GP today about it, and Ithe radiologist has recommended I see a surgeon for recommendation of either biopsy or lumpectomy. That appointment will apparently be in 1-2 weeks. So...just curious what you ladies think I should do??? Lumpectomy, biopsy, or??? I am leaning towards having it removed...for stress reasons...then they can biopsy the sh!t out of it after. Bad idea?